Jump to content

I want to know the real difference between a high speed m.2 and a simple SATA ssd.

 

Difference in OS boot times (from turning on to desktop) and game loads.

 

If you tested it, say what OS/game and both times.

 

Ex: Windows 10 boot - X seconds on SATA and Y seconds on m.2

Ultra is stupid. ALWAYS.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

M.2 is just a connector type, many m.2 SSDs are still running over SATA. Only NVMe M.2 SSDs are actually significantly faster than their 2.5" SATA counterparts.

-----> Official Unofficial Favorite Keyswitch Type Survey <-----

 OWNER OF THE FASTEST INTEL iGPU ON LTT UNIGINE SUPERPOSITION [lol]

 

GAMING RIG "SNOWBLIND"

CPU i5-13600k | COOLING Corsair H150i Elite Capellix 360mm (White) | MOTHERBOARD Gigabyte Z690 Aero G DDR4 | GPU Gigabyte RTX 3070 Vision OC (White) | RAM  16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB (White)SSD Samsung 980 Pro 1TB | PSU ASUS STRIX 850W (White)CASE  Phanteks G360a (White) | HEADPHONES  Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro | KEYBOARD Zoom75 (KTT Strawberry w/ GMK British Racing Green keycaps) | MOUSE  Cooler Master MM711 (White) MONITOR HP X32 1440p 165hz IPS

 

WORK RIG "OVERPRICED BRICK"

Mac Studio (M2 Ultra / 128GB / 1TB) | HEADPHONES  AirPods Pro 2 | KEYBOARD Logitech MX Mechanical Mini | MOUSE  Logitech MX Master 3S MONITOR 2x Dell 4K 32"

 

SECONDARY RIG "ALCATRAZ"

CPU i7-4770K OC @ 4.3GHz | COOLING Cryorig M9i (review| MOTHERBOARD ASUS Z87-PROGPU Gigabyte 1650 Super Windforce OC | RAM  16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 MHzSSD Samsung 860 Evo 512GB | HDD Toshiba 3TB 7200RPMPSU EVGA SuperNOVA NEX 750WCASE  NZXT H230 | HEADPHONES  Sony WH-1000XM3  | KEYBOARD Corsair STRAFE - Cherry MX Brown | MOUSE  Logitech G602 MONITOR LG 34UM58-P 34" Ultrawide

HOLA NIGHT THEMERS

GET YOUR ASS ON NIGHT THEME

OTHER TECH I OWN:

MacBook Pro 16" [M1 Pro/32GB/1TB] | 2022 Volkswagen GTI | iPhone 14 Pro | Sony a6000 | Apple Watch Series 8 45mm | 2018 MBP 15" | Lenovo Flex 3 [i7-5500U, HD5500 (fastest on the forum), 8GB RAM, 256GB Samsung 840 Evo] | PS5, Xbox One & Nintendo Switch [Home Theater setup] | DJI Phantom 3 Standard | AirPods 2 | Jaybird Freedom (two pairs) & X2 [long story, PM if you want to know why I have 3 pairs of Jaybirds]

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299591
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GlassBomb said:

The general point of NVMe drives isn't to boot up, and load games faster.

 

It's about making your whole system more responsive.

which would include startup time....

so it's not the whole point of NVME, but it is one of the points

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Laptop:

Lenovo Yoga 7 Air: Ryzen 7840S, 32GiB DDR5

 

Desktop (Old but I never replaced it):

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 @2000Mhz

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299601
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I haven't sat down with a stop watch, I don't notice any real appreciable difference in load times between an NVMe drive and a SATA drive. Nor do I notice any real appreciable difference in response times for the most part.

 

Unless you're doing something that demands large data requests from the drive, SATA SSDs are about as far as one should go.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299612
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RadiatingLight said:

which would include startup time....

so it's not the whole point of NVME, but it is one of the points

Boot, and loading times will be fast regardless if you are using a normal SATA SSD, or one that uses NVMe though.

 

That's why I say that the main reason is to make your system as a whole more responsive.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299626
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GlassBomb said:

Boot, and loading times will be fast regardless if you are using a normal SATA SSD, or one that uses NVMe though.

 

That's why I say that the main reason is to make your system as a whole more responsive.

but they will both be FASTER when using an NVME drive. that's the whole point of NVME

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Laptop:

Lenovo Yoga 7 Air: Ryzen 7840S, 32GiB DDR5

 

Desktop (Old but I never replaced it):

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 @2000Mhz

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299634
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RadiatingLight said:

but they will both be FASTER when using an NVME drive. that's the whole point of NVME

I'd argue that it's only "technically" faster, but not practically faster.

 

While I haven't seen anything recent regarding loading on storage media, I found this article that shows what's going for storage drives for a variety of games: http://www.pcgamer.com/game-performance-using-different-storage-media/

 

The NVMe and SATA SSD curves almost line up most of the time.

 

EDIT: Found something else: http://techreport.com/review/29221/samsung-950-pro-512gb-ssd-reviewed/4

 

Also this:

If RAM disks show almost no performance improvement, NVMe certainly won't either.

Edited by M.Yurizaki
Added another link regarding performance of NVMe vs SATA
Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299668
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RadiatingLight said:

but they will both be FASTER when using an NVME drive. that's the whole point of NVME

Yes, the NVMe drive will of course be faster. But what I'm saying is that all of the software isn't always able to use the increase in speed. That's why the IOPS are more important than the actual speeds the drives are able to achieve.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9299688
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GlassBomb said:

Yes, the NVMe drive will of course be faster. But what I'm saying is that all of the software isn't always able to use the increase in speed. That's why the IOPS are more important than the actual speeds the drives are able to achieve.

Sure, but NVME as a standard has less overhead, so latency is usually better. OFC the best SATA SSD is better than the worst NVME SSD

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Laptop:

Lenovo Yoga 7 Air: Ryzen 7840S, 32GiB DDR5

 

Desktop (Old but I never replaced it):

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 @2000Mhz

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9300593
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, mok said:

sata is a protocol

Nvme is a protocol

Advanced Host Controller Interface is a protocol

Non Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface Specification (NVMHCI or NVMe) is a protocol

SATA and M.2 are the physical bus interfaces

12 minutes ago, Taja said:

And nobody answered what I was asking, which is the load time difference.

Load time differences are minimal in operations like loading games and the OS (around 0.5 seconds for Windows 10). The benefit of NVMe drives comes when transferring extremely large files as that time slowly adds up to make a significant difference. Some people claim that a NVMe SSD makes loading more fluid, but this is something that can be attributed to the placebo effect as when people spend large amounts of money on something they expect it to provide some sort of advantage over something similar that is cheaper. The primary benefit that I can think of other than marginally faster load times would be the benefit of not having to route cables from a SATA SSD to the motherboard.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9303151
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Qwweb said:

Advanced Host Controller Interface is a protocol

Non Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface Specification (NVMHCI or NVMe) is a protocol

SATA and M.2 are the physical bus interfaces

Load time differences are minimal in operations like loading games and the OS (around 0.5 seconds for Windows 10). The benefit of NVMe drives comes when transferring extremely large files as that time slowly adds up to make a significant difference. Some people claim that a NVMe SSD makes loading more fluid, but this is something that can be attributed to the placebo effect as when people spend large amounts of money on something they expect it to provide some sort of advantage over something similar that is cheaper. The primary benefit that I can think of other than marginally faster load times would be the benefit of not having to route cables from a SATA SSD to the motherboard.

Thanks for the answear. I herd something similar, I just wanted a few numbers for comparison, but I kinda knew it is not meant for the normal user

Ultra is stupid. ALWAYS.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/731990-m2-x-sata/#findComment-9304113
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×