Jump to content

Is Windows Server feasible for a NAS?

If cost is no object, (i.e. MSDN for example) and if most of my clients are running Windows 10, would you recommend using Windows Server 2016 on a NAS versus the other options, such as FreeNAS? If so, what version of Windows Server 2016 would you recommend? (This is just a hypothetical question, although I might build a NAS in the future using this recommendation.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, arbitraryusername123 said:

If cost is no object, (i.e. MSDN for example) and if most of my clients are running Windows 10, would you recommend using Windows Server 2016 on a NAS versus the other options, such as FreeNAS? If so, what version of Windows Server 2016 would you recommend? (This is just a hypothetical question, although I might build a NAS in the future using this recommendation.)

It depends on the NAS box, but usually, I personally wouldn't use a windows server OS for a NAS simply because it's over kill, you don't need the dual socket support for a NAS, or the remote desktop features all that much, unless you have a very powerful NAS and then you'd want the special features of NAS specific OSes. 

Yours faithfully

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, arbitraryusername123 said:

If cost is no object, (i.e. MSDN for example) and if most of my clients are running Windows 10, would you recommend using Windows Server 2016 on a NAS versus the other options, such as FreeNAS? If so, what version of Windows Server 2016 would you recommend? (This is just a hypothetical question, although I might build a NAS in the future using this recommendation.)

You do know you are not supposed to use MSDN for a "Productive Use" instance, yes?   Only for development/testing purposes.   Anyway ...

 

Yes, Windows Server makes a great NAS (at $0 especially).   At $1k then ... depends.

 

If everyone is Windows 10 and you can get SMB3 running optimally, then the network benefits are good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rohime said:

You do know you are not supposed to use MSDN for a "Productive Use" instance, yes?   Only for development/testing purposes.   Anyway ...

 

Yes, Windows Server makes a great NAS (at $0 especially).   At $1k then ... depends.

 

If everyone is Windows 10 and you can get SMB3 running optimally, then the network benefits are good.

I think you mean 'Production Use'.  Development use is usually 'productive'. ;)  Don't assume 'msdn' doesn't include production key sets, our MSDN/VLSC contains all of the keys we use for 'production' workstations and servers.

 

And OP, yes, Windows Server (2012r2 or 2016) is a great OS for a 'nas' application, although it would be a glorified NAS at that point.  You could setup Storage Spaces and go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×