Call of Duty Ghosts: 1080p and 1440p Benchmarks and Graphics Comparison

[digitalnav]

After playing for some hours, there is recoil.

[Snickerzz]

After playing for some hours, there is recoil.

bahahaha

[renz62]

"Ultra" settings... hahahaha

[ACatWithThumbs]

Don't forget PhysX isn't in yet.

[samuel]

GTX 780 and R9 290/x not 1080p gaming cards...  But still only around 60FPS at this low resolution. Max AA of course! 

[Lukiose]

The grass looks weird and the colours look... too dusty, i understand that it's a warzone but too much is too much.

[legopc]

haha what a joke it still looks like cod4

[digitalnav]

haha what a joke it still looks like cod4

I'm getting a 4k monitor today so lets see how that fares.

[DoubleY]

Ultra and low are exactly the same...

You are joking, right?

 

COD may not be the BEST looking game there is, but there is still a very noticeable difference between low and Ultra.

[ShakyKiller]

Wow, it actually requires some power now. Thanks for the benchmarks.

but still looks like shit

[needmorewood]

I'd hardly call a 760 powerful

thats cause ur like alot of us where we cant afford the higher tier cards

[Kilerbomb]

You are joking, right?

 

COD may not be the BEST looking game there is, but there is still a very noticeable difference between low and Ultra.

Maybe I didn't watch the video long enough, but the first few clips have no noticeable differences.

[digitalnav]

Maybe I didn't watch the video long enough, but the first few clips have no noticeable differences.

its more aliasing differences, ULTRA is a lot more sharp.

[Lukiose]

It's almost like having spectacles off between Low & Ultra for someone with ~200 degree vision 

[digitalnav]

It's almost like having spectacles off between Low & Ultra for someone with ~200 degree vision 

Gameplay > Graphics, lets all remember

[Brainless906]

I'm I the only one who thinks its cool to be chit chattin with somebody from a pretty badass computer outlet on this forum? Cause this is pretty cool.

More on topic the game does just look like previous CoDs with upped texture packs...but it may be fun as a brainless (see what i did there?) meatgrinder arcadey shooter. i'll likely just stick to Battlefield 4 and if i want a taste of mindless bullet spammin just get on an Operation Locker

er I mean...Call of Duty bad, lolololol, is for casuals, lul I am pc Master #CoDHatetrain

[RaphYkun]

290x results are interesting. Doesn't this place it lower than the 770? Were any of the cards OCed or like in Quiet Mode or something? (inquisitive voice, not accusatory). I just want to know more about these benchmarks.

[digitalnav]

All stock cards. Seems NVIDIA cards are better optimized.

[MegaDave91]

So the whole... 780 is needed... is for maximum 4k no doubt....

Still a joke...

 

Probably more for 2.5K. Anything under 780 doesn't reach 60fps at 1440P.

[digitalnav]

I'm getting a 4k comparison out soon!

[DaftBehemoth]

I long for the day something other than boring-ass military shooters are used for benchmarks

Did you miss The Witcher 2? The third one is releasing next year as well.

[digitalnav]

I'm I the only one who thinks its cool to be chit chattin with somebody from a pretty badass computer outlet on this forum? Cause this is pretty cool.

More on topic the game does just look like previous CoDs with upped texture packs...but it may be fun as a brainless (see what i did there?) meatgrinder arcadey shooter. i'll likely just stick to Battlefield 4 and if i want a taste of mindless bullet spammin just get on an Operation Locker

er I mean...Call of Duty bad, lolololol, is for casuals, lul I am pc Master #CoDHatetrain

Battlefield is definitely a much PRETTIER looking game. However, I haven't tested 4k on CoD so I can't say anything about that yet.

 

And its great to hang out with you guys as well!