Jump to content

What is the chance that there will be a Thin Mini ITX motherboard for RYZEN (AM4)?

What are the chances of motherboard manufactures to design an AM4 CPU based thin mini ITX motherboard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judging by the fact that there were itx am3 boards I dont see why not.

[GUIDE] LGA 771 Mod for Dell Vostro 220 [GUIDE] LGA 775 BSEL Mod [BUILD] The Mighty Radeon-Powered Dell [VIDEO] Evolution of Intel CPUs

Can you game on an 8-year-old i7? Is the 4-year-old GTX 660 still relevant? Upgrading the HP Pro 3500

Main Rig:

Spoiler

CPU Intel Core i7 4930k @ 4.3GHz | Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe | RAM Hynix 32GB (8x4GB) 2133MHz CL11 | GPU Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming | Case NZXT Phantom 410 | Storage Samsung 850EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB | PSU Cooler Master G650M (650W) | Monitors x1 Dell U2515H, x2 Dell 1907FP | Cooling Noctua NH-D14 w. x2 NF-F12 iPPC-2000 PWM | Keyboard Logitech G610 ORION BROWN | Mouse Logitech Performance MX | OS Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Motherboard manufacturers (MSI, Asus, Gigabyte, etc.) will almost guaranteed make motherboards for AM4 unless Zen never comes out and pigs start to fly. And yes, there probably will be mini ITX boards. 

Welcome to Maryland. 

We have crabs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well im talking about Thin mini ITX motherboards. The ones that use SODIMM ram

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

mini itx boards almost for sure.

 

thin mini itx however is an intel format (They're not the same the main difference is the SODIMM slots instead of DIMM slots for ram and notorious lack of pcie x8 slots)

 

AMD might come up with something similar to thin mini itx once they have the APUs ready (thin mini itx is aimed at the AIO market) but I don't believe they'll support thin mini itx, not right away anyway.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Electronics Wizardy said:

Unlikey. That standard is about as dead as dtx these days.

Really? Why? Has there not been a push toward small thin form factor PC's lately?

Plus with the efficientcy of RYZEN it should be not such a big problem. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Aladd2040 said:

Really? Why? Has there not been a push toward small thin form factor PC's lately?

Plus with the efficientcy of RYZEN it should be not such a big problem. Right?

There has, but not with thin itx, mainly custom boards. Having to use a standard board limits what you can do, and doesn't really help at all.

 

I don't think ryzen will be that effiecent compared to current intel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD actually said a while ago they didn;t plan on having mini-ITX. But this was months ago, maybe during computex? 

 

I don't remember the source, maybe a Crit TV/Tek Sydicate video? 

 

I really hope they do, I am never going back to ATX, or even Micro-ATX.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

There has, but not with thin itx, mainly custom boards. Having to use a standard board limits what you can do, and doesn't really help at all.

 

I don't think ryzen will be that effiecent compared to current intel. 

well the 8 core 16 thread RYZEN CPU with a 95W TDP just slightly edged above the 140W TDP of the i7-6900K(an 8 core 16 thread CPU) in terms of benchmark performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Aladd2040 said:

well the 8 core 16 thread RYZEN CPU with a 95W TDP just slightly edged above the 140W TDP of the i7-6900K(an 8 core 16 thread CPU) in terms of benchmark performance.

Thats marketing, take that with a grain of salt. You don't know what there doing to get those numbers. Wait for reviews.

 

Also AMD and intel rate their TDP's differently.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

Thats marketing, take that with a grain of salt. You don't know what there doing to get those numbers. Wait for reviews.

 

Also AMD and intel rate their TDP's differently.

 

 

I understand that that's why is specifically said benchmark performance (The benchmarks they used).

I did not know that AMD and Intel rate their TDP's differently.

Are AMD watts bigger than Intels :-)?  or are they secretly measuring kilowatts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Aladd2040 said:

I understand that that's why is specifically said benchmark performance (The benchmarks they used).

I did not know that AMD and Intel rate their TDP's differently.

Are AMD watts bigger than Intels :-)?  or are they secretly measuring kilowatts? 

Normally Intels tdp pulls less power than a current amd cpu with the same tdp.


TDP should be taken with grain of salt normally. For example, a 6600k and a 6700k have the same tdp, while the 6700k uses more power. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

Normally Intels tdp pulls less power than a current amd cpu with the same tdp.


TDP should be taken with grain of salt normally. For example, a 6600k and a 6700k have the same tdp, while the 6700k uses more power. 

Ok thanks :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×