Jump to content

Strongly recommend raid 5. strings drives together but you lose one for redundancy. RAID 0 is good but if one fails, you're SOL

 

Ryzen 9 3950x - 64 GB DDR4 - NVME 980 pro SSD - EVGA RTX 3080 FTW Ultra - FAD CASE

Full custom loop / links below out of date

LTT Build Log | PCPP Build Log

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Sorry if I stop responding, I've probably gotten busy as I mostly am only on here while working.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787891
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anay said:

Greeting. Im having hard time about Raid 0. Is it true that Raid 0 has a greater HHD failure rate than non Raid HDD aside from its double speed? I just cant clarify it myself. Thanks.

the probability increases because you are using two drives instead of one. Do not raid 0 cheap drives like the WD blue.

With good quality drives you won't get a failure before your next upgrade, I'm talking about drives designed for RAID such as the WD red and RE drives.

             ☼

ψ ︿_____︿_ψ_   

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787907
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anay said:

Yes. but is Raid 0 affect the HDD durability?

RAID 0 has no significant impact on a HDD's life span, so the drives themselves are no more likely to fail than operating as individual drives. What does increase is the chances of losing data, as if any drive in the array fails, data is lost. RAID 0 does not increase HDD failure rate though. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787913
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raid 0 won't affect HDD's life span but it will rape the living life out of a ssd. If you're worried about losing data raid 10 or 01 (however you wanna put it) is your best bet.

Main PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 3600  | GPU: RTX 2060 | PSU:  | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB | Motherboard:  | Case: Fractal Design Define R6 | Monitor(s):  | Keyboard:  | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310

 

NASUS (NAS)

CPU: Intel Xeon X3440 | Motherboard: Super Micro X8SIL | Memory: 16GB DDR3 1066Mhz ECC UDIMM | HBA: Dell Perc H200 (Flashed to IT Mode) | Drives: 3x 16TB Seagate Exos x16, 2x 6TB Seagate Enterprise, 1x 6TB WD RED

 

RENEKTON (NAS)

CPU: Intel Core i5 4570TE | Case: Fractal Design Define S | Memory: 16G DDR3 1333Mhz SODIMM | HBA: LSI 1068E (Flashed to IT Mode) | Storage: 4x 3TB Hitachi, 2x 3TB WD RED

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787924
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, XenosTech said:

Raid 0 won't affect HDD's life span but it will rape the living life out of a ssd. If you're worried about losing data raid 10 or 01 (however you wanna put it) is your best bet.

Really wouldn't recommend RAID 10. It's wasteful, inefficient and has pretty bad average case failure overhead. If you're going to be using 4 drives, RAID 5 is really the best option in terms of capacity, speed and failure overhead. Rebuild times can be a negative if a drive fails, though. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787931
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Oshino Shinobu said:

Really wouldn't recommend RAID 10. It's wasteful, inefficient and has pretty bad average case failure overhead. If you're going to be using 4 drives, RAID 5 is really the best option in terms of capacity, speed and failure overhead. Rebuild times can be a negative if a drive fails, though. 

If he's gonna use it for gaming and OS then no need for a raid 5 or just be like me and run a raid 0 and have a 1 tb to back it up at different intervals.

Main PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 3600  | GPU: RTX 2060 | PSU:  | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB | Motherboard:  | Case: Fractal Design Define R6 | Monitor(s):  | Keyboard:  | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310

 

NASUS (NAS)

CPU: Intel Xeon X3440 | Motherboard: Super Micro X8SIL | Memory: 16GB DDR3 1066Mhz ECC UDIMM | HBA: Dell Perc H200 (Flashed to IT Mode) | Drives: 3x 16TB Seagate Exos x16, 2x 6TB Seagate Enterprise, 1x 6TB WD RED

 

RENEKTON (NAS)

CPU: Intel Core i5 4570TE | Case: Fractal Design Define S | Memory: 16G DDR3 1333Mhz SODIMM | HBA: LSI 1068E (Flashed to IT Mode) | Storage: 4x 3TB Hitachi, 2x 3TB WD RED

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787935
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, XenosTech said:

If he's gonna use it for gaming and OS then no need for a raid 5 or just be like me and run a raid 0 and have a 1 tb to back it up at different intervals.

It's always a matter of do as I say and not as I do xD

 

I have my OS on a RAID 0 array, which is a terrible idea. 

 

If the system is just for gaming and normal use, I wouldn't recommend RAID at all. Just a good backup is sufficient for non-critical data. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787948
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Oshino Shinobu said:

It's always a matter of do as I say and not as I do xD

 

I have my OS on a RAID 0 array, which is a terrible idea. 

 

If the system is just for gaming and normal use, I wouldn't recommend RAID at all. Just a good backup is sufficient for non-critical data. 

lmao true true but I like raid xD so I raid 0 my game drives + my os drive and I have 2 4 tb's backing those up.... That's another system and not my main.

Main PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 3600  | GPU: RTX 2060 | PSU:  | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB | Motherboard:  | Case: Fractal Design Define R6 | Monitor(s):  | Keyboard:  | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310

 

NASUS (NAS)

CPU: Intel Xeon X3440 | Motherboard: Super Micro X8SIL | Memory: 16GB DDR3 1066Mhz ECC UDIMM | HBA: Dell Perc H200 (Flashed to IT Mode) | Drives: 3x 16TB Seagate Exos x16, 2x 6TB Seagate Enterprise, 1x 6TB WD RED

 

RENEKTON (NAS)

CPU: Intel Core i5 4570TE | Case: Fractal Design Define S | Memory: 16G DDR3 1333Mhz SODIMM | HBA: LSI 1068E (Flashed to IT Mode) | Storage: 4x 3TB Hitachi, 2x 3TB WD RED

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8787954
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Anay said:

~snip~

Hi there :)

 

Just to pitch in with a few comments:

 

RAID0 is designed solely for performance increase with no redundancy at all. The data is split between all drives and written simultaneously on and read from all of them at the same time, boosting the sequential speeds and with little effect on random speeds. This has one big plus and two big minuses:

- You get a great boost in sequential speeds which is great for usage types such as editing and rendering as they benefit mostly from sequential speeds.

- In case one of the drives in the RAID fails or drops out you lose all the data across all drives which increases the chances of data loss by a lot. Add to this the workload added by using the drives in a RAID configuration and you have more than double the chance of data loss when using tow drives in a RAID0 config compared to using them separately.

- Most everyday usage types rely mostly on random read/write speeds over which RAID0 has little effect so you won't be noticing major increase in general performance. Booting from a RAID0 array is often slower as the RAID needs to be initialized first and then the system can proceed with the boot process. 

 

Unless you need specifically a boost in sequential speed or have a good backup setup I would suggest to try to avoid RAID0. 

 

A word on RAID5 too: 

This is a good option for home usage as it both offers good performance boost like RAID0 and offers redundancy on a single-drive failure. There are two major down sides of RAID5, though: 

- it requires at least 3 drives to work and sacrifices the capacity of one whole drive for the redundancy.

- the rebuild time of RAID5 is extremely slow as it may take up to 30 hours for a simple 3-drive RAID to rebuild after a drive failure and during that time if a second drive fails you will again lose all data across all drives. 30 hours is a lot for a constant rebuild process and the drives are put under extreme workloads so this is a real issue to consider. This is why people are more and more moving towards RAID6.

 

Let me know if you need any other info or have any questions! 

 

Captain_WD.

If this helped you, like and choose it as best answer - you might help someone else with the same issue. ^_^
WDC Representative, http://www.wdc.com/ 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8788818
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Anay said:

~snip~

You are most welcome :)

 

JBOD or non-RAID (same thing) is what most people use in their systems with other drives such as external HDDs or network storage devices used for backups. Make sure you have such a backup if you have data that you don't want to lose. Facing data recovery and problematic storage drives is not something you want to do. 

 

Let me know if there's anything else I can help with! 

 

Captain_WD. 

If this helped you, like and choose it as best answer - you might help someone else with the same issue. ^_^
WDC Representative, http://www.wdc.com/ 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/684019-raid-0-hdd/#findComment-8794512
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×