csgo fps

[Linkzcsgo]

what a good graphic card that will give me 300+ 

amd or gtx buget 250

[EminentSun]

gtx 1050ti or rx 470 are good, 300 fps is useless, that most any monitor displays is 165.

[Linkzcsgo]

right now i have a gtx 750 ti i get round 120 on high setting 

 

[Synawke]

5 minutes ago, EminentSun said:

gtx 1050ti or rx 470 are good, 300 fps is useless, that most any monitor displays is 165.

its not useles. especially in csgo. the more fps the better. feels smoother and can decrease input lag and such.

[Synawke]

2 minutes ago, Linkzcsgo said:

right now i have a gtx 750 ti i get round 120 on high setting 

 

well thats your first problem, dont play on the highest settings. but yeah. I would go for a 1060 at that price range

[mbryant]

2 hours ago, Synawke said:

its not useles. especially in csgo. the more fps the better. feels smoother and can decrease input lag and such.

no, there is simply no perceptible difference 

[Linkzcsgo]

how mbryant

[Synawke]

Just now, mbryant said:

no, there is simply no perceptible difference 

no. there certainly is. I see is and feel it. as well as many others

[Synawke]

1 minute ago, mbryant said:

no, there is simply no perceptible difference 

you are welcome to do some research on it if you would like

[mbryant]

13 hours ago, Linkzcsgo said:

how mbryant

how not? go play csgo on a 60hrz monitor or even 120hrz and tell me you can perceive a difference between 120 and 300 fps.

[Synawke]

12 hours ago, mbryant said:

how not? go play csgo on a 60hrz monitor or even 120hrz and tell me you can perceive a difference between 120 and 300 fps.

ill tell you. you can

[SLAYR]

On October 27, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Linkzcsgo said:

what a good graphic card that will give me 300+ 

amd or gtx buget 250

Most igpus can do that.

 

On October 27, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Synawke said:

no. there certainly is. I see is and feel it. as well as many others

This is called the placebo effect, you want it to feel smoother so you perceive it to be smoother, sudden drops in fps can affect the "smoothness" of the image due to accompanying frame latencies.

 

But, if you have a monitor rated to X amount of fps, any amount of fps higher then X is pointless because a monitor can literally only show X amount of fps nothing more. So it is literally impossible to see any difference between 300fps, and 60hz, on a 60hz monitor.

 

This is ignoring any issues dealing with screen tearing which will happen if you you have an fps that doesn't match the refresh rate of he monitor.

 

 

 

[Synawke]

1 minute ago, SLAYR said:

Most igpus can do that.

 

This is called the placebo effect, you want it to feel smoother so you perceive it to be smoother, sudden drops in fps can affect the "smoothness" of the image due to accompanying frame latencies.

 

But, if you have a monitor rated to X amount of fps, any amount of fps higher then X is pointless because a monitor can literally only show X amount of fps nothing more. So it is literally impossible to see any difference between 300fps, and 60hz, on a 60hz monitor.

 

This is ignoring any issues dealing with screen tearing which will happen if you you have an fps that doesn't match the refresh rate of he monitor.

 

 

 

its not the placebo effect. its a real thing and you can look it up if you would like. it is smoother and decreases "input lag" 

 

[Soundsystem90]

Huge difference, in FPS on Source engine in CSGO i play at 90hz but peg the game at 180FPS so that i don't get any sharp dips.

 

 

[SLAYR]

26 minutes ago, Synawke said:

its not the placebo effect. its a real thing and you can look it up if you would like. it is smoother and decreases "input lag" 

 

The fps isn't what causes the input lag, the frame latency is what the issue is, the variations in latency cause the 2ms of input lag from the other post which on top of a 250ms average human reaction time is negligible, going from a 5ms monitor to a 1ms monitor is a bigger improvement. From that standpoint it is literally impossible for a human to perceive that fast of a change. Which is where the placebo effect is then correct.

 

All higher fps does is decrease frame latency which will then cause the frame latency to decrease. It itself isn't what decreases input lag, but can help indirectly decrease input lag.

[Apache Protocol]

CSGO GAME EXPERIENCE

1st build q6600 + 750ti on 1080p @ medium setting = 80-130fps on a 60hz monitor = Great Gaming Experience this is my Personal Opinion.

2nd build G3258 4.7Ghz + 950 on 1080p @ high Setting = 120-160 on a 60hz monitor = WOW Gaming Experience this was really noticeable I don't have fps drop any more

3rd build 4590 + 950 on 1080p @ max setting = 200-300 fps on a 144hz monitor = MIND BLOWING Experience yeah there are thing you can Notice in games even if you are really just an average Gamer.

 

Playing with higher FPS on a 60hz monitor is still good but time to time you will notice screen tearing (image will be spit into to image making my experience sucks) not screen shutter (is like a jumping effect equal to lagging experience)

 

yeah and currently I have not yet tried a G-Sync Monitor some people say it will be a much better experience but some say don't use any kind of Sync on FPS games so I still cant tell if this will benefit you.

 

current 144hz monitor I use is Asus VG248QE