Jump to content

Opinion on XL2730z

Popple2000

Hey guys,

 

As the title suggests, I am looking at the BenQ XL2730z currently on sale at canada computers for 80$ off @ 599$ CAD

I am Currently running a GTX 970 and am wondering if those two would make a decent pair.

I mostly play WoW, with a little BF4 and some Diablo etc mixed in.

I was looking at some of the 21:9 by LG but im thinking the 144hz and 1ms might be a better fit than 60hz on a ultrawide.

I am coming from a random 8ish year old 5ms Acer LCD so anything will be an improvement im sure.

600$ is around the max im looking to spend.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a 1440p, so I don't think you'll benefit from the 144hz with a GTX 970 unless you lower the settings.

I personally think a 1080p (144hz or G-sync) would be more fitting for the GTX 970 with a lower price.

Good luck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mello said:

it's a 1440p, so I don't think you'll benefit from the 144hz with a GTX 970 unless you lower the settings.

I personally think a 1080p (144hz or G-sync) would be more fitting for the GTX 970 with a lower price.

Good luck.

 

The cheapest G-Sync monitor I see is 499$ and its 24" and 1080p

Is going up to 1440p, 27", 1ms and 144hz not worth the 100$ extra for future forward if nothing else?

I should also mention, I am not against upgrading to a 1070 if the 970 cant handle it.

 

Thanks for the input, it's appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mello said:

Acer GN246HL Will this be any good?

I am currently using a 24" 16:10 1200p monitor, so im not really looking to go smaller to be completely honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Popple2000 said:

I am currently using a 24" 16:10 1200p monitor, so im not really looking to go smaller to be completely honest.

How is it smaller?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2016 at 11:14 PM, Glenwing said:

1920×1080 is smaller than 1920×1200.

Didn't notice the 1200,

yet I still think a 1080 is better since it's a 16:9

while the 1200 is 16:10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 10/17/2016 at 9:58 AM, Mello said:

Didn't notice the 1200,

yet I still think a 1080 is better since it's a 16:9

while the 1200 is 16:10

I am just not willing to downsize my monitor.

If I am spending more money, I'd like more pixels.. not less lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Popple2000 said:

I am just not willing to downsize my monitor.

If I am spending more money, I'd like more pixels.. not less lol

I mean you have a GTX 970 which won't be the best for higher than 1080p.

But it should be fine with none high demanding games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×