500 gaming pc

[NinjaMonkey2017]

Spoiler

 

Is this build for for gaming 1080 and 60fps newer games?

 

http://pcpartpicker.com/list/rv6fPs

[Slottr]

Spare another like 30-40$ and you can get an rx 480

[NinjaMonkey2017]

Just now, Slottr said:

Spare another like 30-40$ and you can get an rx 480

Ok is i3 good for newer games

[PRTI]

Just now, NinjaMonkey2017 said:

Ok is i3 good for newer games

You may want a i5

[Slottr]

Just now, NinjaMonkey2017 said:

Ok is i3 good for newer games

Well.. what kinda games?

[NinjaMonkey2017]

Just now, Slottr said:

Well.. what kinda games?

Csgo overwatch bf4 or bf1 gta ect

[PRTI]

1 minute ago, NinjaMonkey2017 said:

Csgo overwatch bf4 or bf1 gta ect

You could really really benefit from a i5

[ArumanBE]

9 minutes ago, NinjaMonkey2017 said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Is this build for for gaming 1080 and 60fps newer games?

 

http://pcpartpicker.com/list/rv6fPs

in your budget i would go with an "AMD X4 880K" paired with an FM2+ MB ... i think it would give you a bit better perfomance in gaming then an I3

[NinjaMonkey2017]

Which one you recommend

 

[ArumanBE]

though an I5 would be a better choise it's also a more expensive choise ... the cheapest I5 is an I5-6400 wich costs almost double from the I3 ... if you would like to stay in the same budget look at the AMD X4, if you can spend the money look at the I5

[Castdeath97]

13 minutes ago, ArumanBE said:

in your budget i would go with an "AMD X4 880K" paired with an FM2+ MB ... i think it would give you a bit better perfomance in gaming then an I3

No. It gets beaten by a i3 6300:

 

 

Edit: and if you need more benchmarks

 

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/72286-amd-athlon-x4-880k-review-9.html

 

Moreover with i3 you can at least upgarde to a i5/i7 later on; there is nothing to upgrade to from the 880K without changing the motherboard.

[ArumanBE]

6 minutes ago, Castdeath97 said:

No. It gets beaten by a i3 6300 by a margin:

 

 

though it's a small margin indeed the I3 looks a better choise ... going from what i already read about the X4 i would seriously think extra core's would give it an advantage over the I3 in some games.
for OP: as proven here the I3 isn't a bad choise ... if you can spend it though go for the I5 if not well then stick with the I3 :-)

[Matias_Chambers]

14 minutes ago, NinjaMonkey2017 said:

Which one you recommend

 

I would go for the i5 6400. It's not much more expensive than the i3.

[Castdeath97]

Just now, ArumanBE said:

though it's a small margin indeed the I3 looks a better choise ... going from what i already read about it i would seriously think extra core's would give it an advantage in some games.
for OP: as proven here the I3 isn't a bad choise ... if you can spend it though go for the I5 if not well then stick with the I3 :-)

The 880K is not a true quad core. It has two modules http://www.anandtech.com/show/10103/amd-launches-the-a107890k-and-athlon-x4-880k

[ArumanBE]

2 minutes ago, Castdeath97 said:

The 880K is not a true quad core. It has two modules http://www.anandtech.com/show/10103/amd-launches-the-a107890k-and-athlon-x4-880k

should have 4 cores like AMD advertises

[PRTI]

5 minutes ago, Castdeath97 said:

The 880K is not a true quad core. It has two modules http://www.anandtech.com/show/10103/amd-launches-the-a107890k-and-athlon-x4-880k

The same as any other FX CPU

 

CMT

[Waqas409]

26 minutes ago, NinjaMonkey2017 said:

Csgo overwatch bf4 or bf1 gta ect

CSGO and battlefield are more like CPU intensive games. If you can get an i5, it will give u more performance in these games.

[Aereldor]

@NinjaMonkey2017- that's a great build, and you're looking at a solid 1080p 60FPS in most games at high settings. Consider upgrading to a core i5 6600 later on when you can afford it, but other than that, you're good to go.

[ArumanBE]

3 minutes ago, keNNySOC said:

The same as any other FX CPU

 

CMT

true it only has two actual modules but they produce 2 threads per module and keeping in mind that it isn't hyperthread doesn't that count for two cores then?

[Castdeath97]

5 minutes ago, ArumanBE said:

should have 4 cores like AMD advertises

No exactly, each two cores share one Floating point unit.

 

The same as bulldozer: 

 

 

 

[PRTI]

Just now, ArumanBE said:

true it only has two actual modules but they produce 2 threads per module and keeping in mind that it isn't hyperthread doesn't that count for two cores then?

No,those cores interact with each-other and share a floating point unit,there not standalone cores

[PRTI]

@ArumanBE AMD CPU's use CMT (Clustered Multithreading) or previously named by AMD "module",there CPU's use modules,each module has 2 cores(which interact with each-other and share a floating point unit),and because there not standalone cores,the CPU is not like a 4 core CPU from Intel 

[ArumanBE]

2 minutes ago, Castdeath97 said:

No exactly, each two cores share one Floating point unit.

 

The same as bulldozer: 

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, keNNySOC said:

No,those cores interact with each-other and share a floating point unit,there not standalone cores

ok so to simplify it, it's actualy a physical 2 core with a sort of hyperthread so it generates 4 threads out of those 2 modules. no seperate compute unit per thread

[PRTI]

4 minutes ago, ArumanBE said:

 

ok so to simplify it, it's actualy a physical 2 core with a sort of hyperthread so it generates 4 threads out of those 2 modules. no seperate compute unit per thread

Its not that way,if it was that way,they would have 8 core CPU's with 16 threads,but they have 8 core cpus with 8 threads

 

Look at that CPU the 880k has 2 modules,in those 2 modules we have 2 cores (which are not standalone cores),a core is the physical hardware that works on the thread and has nothing to do with the module (the core has,threads do not),were not hyper-threading the CPU,were hyper-coring it

[ArumanBE]

5 minutes ago, keNNySOC said:

Its not that way,if it was that way,they would have 8 core CPU's with 16 threads,but they have 8 core cpus with 8 threads

 

Look at that CPU the 880k has 2 modules,in those 2 modules we have 2 cores (which are not standalone cores),a core is the physical hardware that works on the thread,were not hyper-threading the CPU,were hyper-coring it

thank you good sir for this info ... made me wanne go in to this a bit more in depth :-) ... gues i got lots more of reading to do ... isn't that simpel as i thought it be.