Fury X bencmarks

[lovingGamer]

Fury X bencmarks

 

where can i find some fresh 2016 benchmarks for Fury X?

[App4that]

Jayz2cents on YouTube

[ZetZet]

Nothing has changed.

[App4that]

Nothing has changed.

Shhhhh. Don't spoil the surprise.

[grayperview]

Nothing has changed.

Actually i am getting 5-10% more performance on newer drivers than, the initial release drivers...

[ZetZet]

Actually i am getting 5-10% more performance on newer drivers than, the initial release drivers...

Yes. But that happens with every graphics card on the market. They all improve. 

[App4that]

Actually i am getting 5-10% more performance on newer drivers than, the initial release drivers...

No, because as new games release, like always, the performance in those games is lower than months later.

This is AMD we're talking about.

The synthetic benchmarks are the same. Within a margin.

[grayperview]

Yes. But that happens with every graphics card on the market. They all improve. 

well you said nothing has changes, as clearly it has....

[AresKrieger]

well you said nothing has changes, as clearly it has....

Relative to the 980ti nothing has changed

 

@lovingGamer if you where hoping the furyx has caught up to the 980ti, it has not, and has lost it's edge in dx12 benches, otherwise it has seen slight performance gains

[grayperview]

No, because as new games release, like always, the performance in those games is lower than months later.

This is AMD we're talking about.

The synthetic benchmarks are the same. Within a margin.

So 71fps to 78fps in valley is within margin?

[ZetZet]

well you said nothing has changes, as clearly it has....

Nothing has changed in the standings of cards. Fury X is still in the meh category behind a 980Ti and even Nano with reduced price now kicks Fury X's ass in value proposition. 

[App4that]

So 71fps to 78fps in valley is within margin?

Do you know how many Fury X graphics cards are produced? And the range in performance between them?

To answer your question, yes.

[lovingGamer]

Nothing has changed in the standings of cards. Fury X is still in the meh category behind a 980Ti and even Nano with reduced price now kicks Fury X's ass in value proposition. 

Really?

[DXMember]

Really?

Fury X is almost tied with 980ti reference - get whichever is cheaper

Fury (non-X) is performs almost the same as Fury X and in some games at 4K is tied with Titan X, which is hillarious

honestly I would consider 980ti aftermarket vs Fury (non-X) - how much you want to spend or save money, when reaching for Kingpins or Lightnings, you can sometimes squeese in a Fury crossfire in that budget

[grayperview]

Relative to the 980ti nothing has changed

That is not what was asked...he asked about newer benchmarks for fury x cards....

 

You in your ignorance spouted that nothing has changed since launch, i clearly in my more informed position (as fucking own a fucking fury card) pointed out you are clearly wrong.

 

Fact the fury X has improved performance since launch, whether or not its closer for further behind the 980ti is completely irrelevant to his question.

 

Typical of what this forum as become uninformed muppets posting for the sake of posting...

[Necrodead]

 

Really? 

Well if you want to listen to a cat, but everyone knows those guys are jerks. (jk)

 

The fury X is better at 4k than the 980ti, so there is that to consider if you have a 4k monitor, and they are fairly close at 1440p with the 980ti edging ahead a tiny bit. and ofc 980ti is better at 1080p.

 

 

Relative to the 980ti nothing has changed

 

@lovingGamer if you where hoping the furyx has caught up to the 980ti, it has not, and has lost it's edge in dx12 benches, otherwise it has seen slight performance gains

 

I'm just going to mention (as you are correct) that the reason for that is because nice guys AMD let Nvidia look at their DX12 code so that Nvidia can easily make their cards perform on par with AMDs. Nvidia does not let AMD look at any source code and thats why stuff like hairworks kills AMDs framerates and why they had to make their own tessilation software, which Nvidia then incorporates into their own to make it even better.

[grayperview]

Do you know how many Fury X graphics cards are produced? And the range in performance between them?

To answer your question, yes.

You are either trolling or fucking retarded, 71-77 is 10%

 

10% is not margin of error

 

1% at most in margin of error when it comes to graphics cards, and given there is zero variable with a fury X card as they are all a stock card, there should be virtually no difference is performance from one to another.

[AresKrieger]

That is not what was asked...he asked about newer benchmarks for fury x cards....

 

You in your ignorance spouted that nothing has changed since launch, i clearly in my more informed position (as fucking own a fucking fury card) pointed out you are clearly wrong.

 

Fact the fury X has improved performance since launch, whether or not its closer for further behind the 980ti is completely irrelevant to his question.

 

Typical of what this forum as become uninformed muppets posting for the sake of posting...

 

He wanted the info as a comparison to the 980ti given his reply regardless of what you believe, and I did add to my post before you responded back stating a slight increase but that was directed at the op in case my assumption that he wanted to know relative to the 980ti was wrong (but it wasn't)

[lovingGamer]

way off point...

[Masada02]

Basically,

 

-Fury X performance has increased since launch

-Historically speaking, Fury X performance is extremely likely to continue increasing for the next 4-5 years.

-You are not going to find Fury X benchmarks on the newest drivers because most people don't seem to care

-The Fury X performance is on par with a reference 980ti

-Any aftermarket 980ti, even at the same cost as a reference model, will perform better than a Fury X in current situations

-Unless you really want/need the AIO cooler that's on the Fury X, buy a 980ti

[Necrodead]

Basically,

 

-Fury X performance has increased since launch

-Historically speaking, Fury X performance is extremely likely to continue increasing for the next 4-5 years.

-You are not going to find Fury X benchmarks on the newest drivers because most people don't seem to care

-The Fury X performance is on par with a reference 980ti

-Any aftermarket 980ti, even at the same cost as a reference model, will perform better than a Fury X in current situations

-Unless you really want/need the AIO cooler that's on the Fury X, buy a 980ti

oooooorrrrrr..... unless you play at 4k where the fury X is a better card.

[Masada02]

oooooorrrrrr..... unless you play at 4k where the fury X is a better card.

meehhhhhhhhhhh, that's really only considering a reference 980ti where the Fury X is a clear winner at 4k. Once you move to aftermarket 980ti's that boost much higher the 980ti is about equal to the Fury X at 4k.

 

I had 2 Fury X's since their launch up until last week...

[afyeung]

I'm just going to mention (as you are correct) that the reason for that is because nice guys AMD let Nvidia look at their DX12 code so that Nvidia can easily make their cards perform on par with AMDs. Nvidia does not let AMD look at any source code and thats why stuff like hairworks kills AMDs framerates and why they had to make their own tessilation software, which Nvidia then incorporates into their own to make it even better.

 

That's not true. DX12 is an API by microsoft which all developers can see and use. The advantage AMD has is async shaders which is built into GCN. Nvidia can't do anything about that for their own cards except to add that in the next gen. You are right about Nvidia not letting AMD see anything

[ivan134]

The closest thing to a new benchmark is the recent nitro 390 benchmark on techpowerup. The reviewer always retests for each of his benchmarks and the fury x is included in that one.

[afyeung]

You are either trolling or fucking retarded, 71-77 is 10%

 

10% is not margin of error

 

1% at most in margin of error when it comes to graphics cards, and given there is zero variable with a fury X card as they are all a stock card, there should be virtually no difference is performance from one to another.

Your sig says you have a Fury Tri X. The new Fury Nitro is the only Fury card worth getting for non ITX builds. It can actually overclock and get decent performance lol. Custom PCBs ftw