128 vs 64 tick CS.

[LokiFire]

Hello, CSGO again.

 

I am not used to 128 tick, and well aim wise it's very different to 64 tick i find.

I am quite consistent in 64 tick but not so much in 128 tick, i still do ok and make most shots however i feel everything is either way more sharper (instant) and i am just not up to speed with it yet?

 

I am also capped at 160FPS as well my CPU let's me down but it's not a massive problem, lowest FPs observed in 128 tick was 111fps.

[Nup]

Is ticks a new cool way of say ping? 

[LokiFire]

Is ticks a new cool way of say ping? 

Nothing to do with ping, it's how fast you and the server update.

[Xenift]

Well, actually 64 and 128 is very big of a difference to be honest here.

 

I went to play a 64 - 128 ping server (You can't run 128 smoothly without a beast of a CPU).

 

The AWPing in it is just so accurate that i find  myself to be hitting 30% more shots.

[Guest]

Hello, CSGO again.

 

I am not used to 128 tick, and well aim wise it's very different to 64 tick i find.

I am quite consistent in 64 tick but not so much in 128 tick, i still do ok and make most shots however i feel everything is either way more sharper (instant) and i am just not up to speed with it yet?

 

I am also capped at 160FPS as well my CPU let's me down but it's not a massive problem, lowest FPs observed in 128 tick was 111fps.

It seem to me like you said you're not used to it. It is better to play at higher tick rates IMO tho. 

[eLucid]

Is ticks a new cool way of say ping? 

 

He's referring to server tick rate.

 

 

The general consensus is that you need 300 fps in order for things to "feel right" - even if it means lowering your settings (performance > looks). That should fix any issues you're currently having.

 

You'll get used to it.

[eLucid]

Hello, CSGO again.

 

I am not used to 128 tick, and well aim wise it's very different to 64 tick i find.

I am quite consistent in 64 tick but not so much in 128 tick, i still do ok and make most shots however i feel everything is either way more sharper (instant) and i am just not up to speed with it yet?

 

I am also capped at 160FPS as well my CPU let's me down but it's not a massive problem, lowest FPs observed in 128 tick was 111fps.

 

I should have mentioned, what rates are you currently using? I'm sure you already know this but if you aren't using the correct rates - your shots won't register properly.

 

While not in game, open your console and type the following commands.

 

rate 128000

cl_cmdrate 128

cl_updaterate 128

cl_interp 0

cl_interp_ratio 1

[-iSynthesis]

Is ticks a new cool way of say ping? 

tick rate is the a number indicating how often the server syncs with the clients in one second. 

[Nup]

Nothing to do with ping, it's how fast you and the server update.

 

 

He's referring to server tick rate. The general consensus is that you need 300 fps in order for things to "feel right" - even if it means lowering your settings (performance > looks). That should fix any issues you're currently having.

 

You'll get used to it.

 

 

tick rate is the a number indicating how often the server syncs with the clients in one second. 

 

I see, thanks for the answers guys! first i'v heard of this term. 

[FunkyFeatures]

I don't feel a big difference from 128-64 or 64-128 but it takes me a game or so to warmup to the "new" tickrate - coming from matchmaking to FaceIT/CEVO needs a game to adapt to higher tickrates, and the same with going back to MM.

[LokiFire]

I don't feel a big difference from 128-64 or 64-128 but it takes me a game or so to warmup to the "new" tickrate - coming from matchmaking to FaceIT/CEVO needs a game to adapt to higher tickrates, and the same with going back to MM.

Yeah i have had 4 matches on CEVO now and gotten used to it, i see a lot more FPS drops though.

[Zhuocheng]

128 tick feels so much more responsive than 64. I can't play MM since I got used to 128 tick