Jump to content

there is no ssd in market which speed 10GBPS ?

Raghav Arya
Go to solution Solved by rmac52,

ssd's top out at around 550 MB/s for sata 3 ssd's

Gigabit or Gigabyte? Kind of important.

[Out-of-date] Want to learn how to make your own custom Windows 10 image?

 

Desktop: AMD R9 3900X | ASUS ROG Strix X570-F | Radeon RX 5700 XT | EVGA GTX 1080 SC | 32GB Trident Z Neo 3600MHz | 1TB 970 EVO | 256GB 840 EVO | 960GB Corsair Force LE | EVGA G2 850W | Phanteks P400S

Laptop: Intel M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics | 8GB RAM | 250GB Micron SSD | Asus UX305FA

Server 01: Intel Xeon D 1541 | ASRock Rack D1541D4I-2L2T | 32GB Hynix ECC DDR4 | 4x8TB Western Digital HDDs | 32TB Raw 16TB Usable

Server 02: Intel i7 7700K | Gigabye Z170N Gaming5 | 16GB Trident Z 3200MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

ssd's top out at around 550 MB/s for sata 3 ssd's

01010010 01101111 01100010  01001101 01100001 01100011 01010010 01100001 01100101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fastest ssd I can find is an intel nvme drive at 5 GBps

01010010 01101111 01100010  01001101 01100001 01100011 01010010 01100001 01100101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fastest ssd I can find is an intel nvme drive at 5 GBps

2 of them in raid 0?

Thats that. If you need to get in touch chances are you can find someone that knows me that can get in touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no ssd in market which speed 10GBPS ?

 

 

2 of them in raid 0?

Op asked if there is one ssd on the market rated at 10 GBps

01010010 01101111 01100010  01001101 01100001 01100011 01010010 01100001 01100101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gigabit

Since normal consumer ssds (850 evo) reach speeds upto 6 gigabit per second.

Intel 750 SSD, that should easily exceed 10 gigabit per second

Lets all ripperoni in pepperoni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no ssd in market which speed 10GBPS ?

 

The fastest normal SATA based SSD's cap out at around 500~550 MB/s. And NVMe drives (950 Pro as an example) has reads of up to 2.5 GB/s and writes up to 1.5 GB/s. Which is more than enough for most people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, actually if you have a crap-ton of money take a look at Fusio IO (now acquired by Sandisk).  A Fusion IO PX600-1000 has a specification of Read Bandwidth (GB/s)2 2.7 and Write Bandwidth (GB/s)2 1.5.  That works out to 21.6 Gb/sec in read bandwidth and 12 Gb/sec in write bandwidth.  If you pick their other model the speeds increase.

Workstation 1: Intel i7 4790K | Thermalright MUX-120 | Asus Maximus VII Hero | 32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite 1866 9-9-9-27 ( 4 x 8GB) | 2 x EVGA GTX 980 SC | Samsung 850 Pro 512GB | Samsung 840 EVO 500GB | HGST 4TB NAS 7.2KRPM | 2 x HGST 6TB NAS 7.2KRPM | 1 x Samsung 1TB 7.2KRPM | Seasonic 1050W 80+ Gold | Fractal Design Define R4 | Win 8.1 64-bit
NAS 1: Intel Intel Xeon E3-1270V3 | SUPERMICRO MBD-X10SL7-F-O | 32GB RAM DDR3L ECC (8GBx4) | 12 x HGST 4TB Deskstar NAS | SAMSUNG 850 Pro 256GB (boot/OS) | SAMSUNG 850 Pro 128GB (ZIL + L2ARC) | Seasonic 650W 80+ Gold | Rosewill RSV-L4411 | Xubuntu 14.10

Notebook: Lenovo T500 | Intel T9600 | 8GB RAM | Crucial M4 256GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, actually if you have a crap-ton of money take a look at Fusio IO (now acquired by Sandisk).  A Fusion IO PX600-1000 has a specification of Read Bandwidth (GB/s)2 2.7 and Write Bandwidth (GB/s)2 1.5.  That works out to 21.6 Gb/sec in read bandwidth and 12 Gb/sec in write bandwidth.  If you pick their other model the speeds increase.

 

Or save yourself tons of money and use 6 Samsung Pros with windows storage spaces auto tiering. 6TB of storage at same speed as that fusion IO card but a fraction of the cost and can be made way bigger just by adding more HDD's to the pool.

 

StorageSpaces Mirror 3Column SSD HDD 10QD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or save yourself tons of money and use 6 Samsung Pros with windows storage spaces auto tiering. 6TB of storage at same speed as that fusion IO card but a fraction of the cost and can be made way bigger just by adding more HDD's to the pool.

 

 

 

Depends on your application of the storage.  ATTO disk benchmark isn't really a great source in analysis of IO performance.  If you're only doing sustain workload at 256MB the numbers look great but where things will likely break down is when you introduce random IO into the mix at smaller block sizes.  Sure, fusion IO are not cheap at all but they excel greatly at random workloads.  I was under the impression the OP was looking for a single device that could achieve this otherwise I would have suggested something else like a PureStorage array.

Workstation 1: Intel i7 4790K | Thermalright MUX-120 | Asus Maximus VII Hero | 32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite 1866 9-9-9-27 ( 4 x 8GB) | 2 x EVGA GTX 980 SC | Samsung 850 Pro 512GB | Samsung 840 EVO 500GB | HGST 4TB NAS 7.2KRPM | 2 x HGST 6TB NAS 7.2KRPM | 1 x Samsung 1TB 7.2KRPM | Seasonic 1050W 80+ Gold | Fractal Design Define R4 | Win 8.1 64-bit
NAS 1: Intel Intel Xeon E3-1270V3 | SUPERMICRO MBD-X10SL7-F-O | 32GB RAM DDR3L ECC (8GBx4) | 12 x HGST 4TB Deskstar NAS | SAMSUNG 850 Pro 256GB (boot/OS) | SAMSUNG 850 Pro 128GB (ZIL + L2ARC) | Seasonic 650W 80+ Gold | Rosewill RSV-L4411 | Xubuntu 14.10

Notebook: Lenovo T500 | Intel T9600 | 8GB RAM | Crucial M4 256GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on your application of the storage.  ATTO disk benchmark isn't really a great source in analysis of IO performance.  If you're only doing sustain workload at 256MB the numbers look great but where things will likely break down is when you introduce random IO into the mix at smaller block sizes.  Sure, fusion IO are not cheap at all but they excel greatly at random workloads.  I was under the impression the OP was looking for a single device that could achieve this otherwise I would have suggested something else like a PureStorage array.

 

Well yes that is true, but it's not like I'm going to post a complete article with pictures as a reply to a comment on here. A Fusion IO device in small block IO is about twice as fast, you can see the small block speeds in the pic, the size test file doesn't change that benchmark much.

 

The only thing holding back the Storage Spaces performance is the AHCI/SATA interfaces, both devices are flash based storage from vendors that make the fastest devices in the market. Mine on the other hand can be used at home with something as small as 1 SSD and 1 HDD.

 

Also I could swap out the current SSD's with NVMe ones and surpass the Fusion IO, but for enterprise use Fusion IO will still always be the better choice. Heck I could even use the Fusion IO in with Storage Spaces

My point was if you want to go crazy and add things like Fusion IO there are other technologies out there too.

 

Edit: By both devices I mean Samsung v Fusion IO, excuse the confusing sentence :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×