Jump to content

ATH M-Series Questions

Made In Canada

We all know that if you want a flat headphone, Sony MDR-7506 and V6 is pretty much the way to go, and they're only like 85 bucks. 

Yesss this. I have the V6, and its only shortcoming is its soundstage is medium-narrow. But get the V6 over the MDR-7506 - many people think the newer MDR-7506 is less even than the V6. 

 

j8HqX4h.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a point there, graphs and charts can't really make you decide on what you want. Testing them in store is the best option always.

It just comes down to personal preference from there. But to say something is flat when measurements may or may not tell a different story is just a wrong way of saying a particular headphone is flat. Not all ears are the same. Some have a tendency to have impacted ears, having hearing deficiency, sensitive to certain frequencies which may cause irritation (which is why I never liked the T1 as it had harsh treble), or are naturally "perfect" hearing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a point there, graphs and charts can't really make you decide on what you want. Testing them in store is the best option always.

No. If you know what you like, graphs and charts are an excellent way to decide on a headphone, because if two headphones sound similar, then they will have similar measurements. 

 

Saying that the M50X is 'Neutral' is utter crap. They are NOT a neutral headphone, in any sense. They are a bass-heavy headphone, that has no reason to call itself a monitoring headphone. It is a fact that the M50X is a bass-heavy headphone, so you clearly like headphones with more bass. There's nothing wrong with that. There is, however, something wrong with you calling them neutral, because that's a fallacy. @SSL, after this, I totally agree. Most of these topics are literally rehashes of things that we have been over many, many times. 

Hey! New SIgnature! 

 

I'm supposedly a person on the Internet, but you'll never know if I'm human or not ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. If you know what you like, graphs and charts are an excellent way to decide on a headphone, because if two headphones sound similar, then they will have similar measurements. 

 

Saying that the M50X is 'Neutral' is utter crap. They are NOT a neutral headphone, in any sense. They are a bass-heavy headphone, that has no reason to call itself a monitoring headphone. It is a fact that the M50X is a bass-heavy headphone, so you clearly like headphones with more bass. There's nothing wrong with that. There is, however, something wrong with you calling them neutral, because that's a fallacy. @SSL, after this, I totally agree. Most of these topics are literally rehashes of things that we have been over many, many times. 

We need like a master thread, withanswers to all the common questions.

 

I mean, there is one, but it needs to be read, and have even more info about specific headphones and such

n0ah1897, on 05 Mar 2014 - 2:08 PM, said:  "Computers are like girls. It's whats in the inside that matters.  I don't know about you, but I like my girls like I like my cases. Just as beautiful on the inside as the outside."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't any such thing as a neutral headphone. Everyone has a unique HRTF, which means that getting it completely right above 1kHz is impossible. On the low end, headphones should really have rising response into the sub bass, which is impossible. Flat is not neutral, either. I prefer to use the term "uncolored" which implies that there are no narrow-band peaks or dips which might create an unnatural timbre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't any such thing as a neutral headphone. Everyone has a unique HRTF, which means that getting it completely right above 1kHz is impossible. On the low end, headphones should really have rising response into the sub bass, which is impossible. Flat is not neutral, either. I prefer to use the term "uncolored" which implies that there are no narrow-band peaks or dips which might create an unnatural timbre.

Fair enough :) I'll work on transitioning my vocabulary over ;)

Hey! New SIgnature! 

 

I'm supposedly a person on the Internet, but you'll never know if I'm human or not ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough :) I'll work on transitioning my vocabulary over ;)

 

It may just be dithering over semantics, but I find it silly when people declare a headphone "neutral". Too subjective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may just be dithering over semantics, but I find it silly when people declare a headphone "neutral". Too subjective.

It may be, but I think that if we use the same terms it will help out, since that will let people know that we are talking about the same things.

Hey! New SIgnature! 

 

I'm supposedly a person on the Internet, but you'll never know if I'm human or not ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't any such thing as a neutral headphone. Everyone has a unique HRTF, which means that getting it completely right above 1kHz is impossible. On the low end, headphones should really have rising response into the sub bass, which is impossible. Flat is not neutral, either. I prefer to use the term "uncolored" which implies that there are no narrow-band peaks or dips which might create an unnatural timbre.

Has there ever been a headphone, based on measurements, that have achieved something close enough to be considered uncolored? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there ever been a headphone, based on measurements, that have achieved something close enough to be considered uncolored?

Yeah. The hd800 is probably one of the more prominent candidates. Also the stax sr009, when paired with an appropriate energizer.

Hey! New SIgnature! 

 

I'm supposedly a person on the Internet, but you'll never know if I'm human or not ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there ever been a headphone, based on measurements, that have achieved something close enough to be considered uncolored? 

 

Plenty. It's open to interpretation, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. The hd800 is probably one of the more prominent candidates. Also the stax sr009, when paired with an appropriate energizer.

 

 

Plenty. It's open to interpretation, though.

Well, which was has been close enough thats considered the absolute uncolored sound based on measurements? I'm just asking for the sake of curiosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, which was has been close enough thats considered the absolute uncolored sound based on measurements? I'm just asking for the sake of curiosity.

The stax sr009 some pretty close to flat, according to the measurements from inner fidelity. It has some weirdness in the upper bass with a lift, but other than that it's pretty good.

Also, it has really good impulse response, and does a good job with 30 and 300hz square waves. That being said, that's totally expected from an electrostatic headphone, since the diaphragm weighs almost nothing.

Hey! New SIgnature! 

 

I'm supposedly a person on the Internet, but you'll never know if I'm human or not ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, which was has been close enough thats considered the absolute uncolored sound based on measurements? I'm just asking for the sake of curiosity.

 

HD800, DT880, some Stax as mentioned. Anything that measures more or less flat below 1kHz and doesn't have anything too weird going on above that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

HD800, DT880, some Stax as mentioned. Anything that measures more or less flat below 1kHz and doesn't have anything too weird going on above that.

HE-500 does a pretty decent job of it too.

Hey! New SIgnature! 

 

I'm supposedly a person on the Internet, but you'll never know if I'm human or not ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The stax sr009 some pretty close to flat, according to the measurements from inner fidelity. It has some weirdness in the upper bass with a lift, but other than that it's pretty good.

Also, it has really good impulse response, and does a good job with 30 and 300hz square waves. That being said, that's totally expected from an electrostatic headphone, since the diaphragm weighs almost nothing.

 

 

HD800, DT880, some Stax as mentioned. Anything that measures more or less flat below 1kHz and doesn't have anything too weird going on above that.

I see. Now I feel like I wanna get a DT880.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ATH -MSR7's start with an M. That is an "M" series Audio-Technica headphone that I would recommend. :P

Internets Machine: Intel 4690k w/ Be Quiet! Pure Rock 4.7Ghz. MSI Krait z97. 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Ram. MSI GTX 970 SLI 1520mhz. 500GB Samsung EVO 840  & 3TB WD Blue Drive. Rosewill 1000w Modular PSU. Corsair Air 540

My Beats Yo: Desktop:SMSL SA-160 Amp, KEF Q100 w/ Dayton 100w Sub Theater: Micca MB42X-C x3, MB42X x2, COVO-S x2 w/Dayton 120w Sub Headphones:  HIFiMan HE-400i, PSB M4U2, Philips Fidelio X2, Modded Fostex T50RP, ATH-M50, NVX XPT100, Phillips SHP9500, Pioneer SE-A1000, Hyper X Cloud 1&2, CHC Silverado, Superlux 668B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Flat is not neutral, either.

^That's the part I never understood. Can you/someone explain this or point me to an article that does?

 

I know that our outer ears and ear canals mess with the frequencies, but I don't understand why headphones would need to account for that if sound from real sources has to go through the same things in our ears. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

^That's the part I never understood. Can you/someone explain this or point me to an article that does?

 

I know that our outer ears and ear canals mess with the frequencies, but I don't understand why headphones would need to account for that if sound from real sources has to go through the same things in our ears. 

 

Normal sounds are boosted by the outer ear structures, resulting in a broad peak centered around 3-4kHz. This peak is not subtle; it's on the order of 20dB or more. We are used to hearing this as neutral because all incoming sound is affected, including sound from speakers.

 

Headphones bypass the outer ear, thus this natural boost to the upper mid-range does not occur. As a result, a truly flat headphone will sound as though it has a large cut in this frequency range. The only solution is to boost the response of the headphone in the affected range. Angled drivers supposedly help in this area as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×