Jump to content

Google chrome memory issue fixed.

no vivaldi users here?

CPU: Intel Core i5 4690K @ 4.6Ghz CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 GPU: GTX 1070 TI RAM: Crucial Ballistix Tactical 16GB (4x4) Mobo: ASUS Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) PSU: Corsair RM Series RM750 Case: Fractal Design Define R4 no window

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sensible idea, but if you're looking for reasons as to why its RAM usage is astronomical, this is it.

Its not an idea :P that was the "selling" points for Chrome, you didn't lose all your work if flash decided to crash a tab. Isolating each tab as a different process was the whole idea :)

Case: NZXT Phantom PSU: EVGA G2 650w Motherboard: Asus Z97-Pro (Wifi-AC) CPU: 4690K @4.2ghz/1.2V Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 Ram: Kingston HyperX FURY 16GB 1866mhz GPU: Gigabyte G1 GTX970 Storage: (2x) WD Caviar Blue 1TB, Crucial MX100 256GB SSD, Samsung 840 SSD Wifi: TP Link WDN4800

 

Donkeys are love, Donkeys are life.                    "No answer means no problem!" - Luke 2015

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not an idea :P that was the "selling" points for Chrome, you didn't lose all your work if flash decided to crash a tab. Isolating each tab as a different process was the whole idea :)

 

Yes, but a direct consequence is the big argument against using Chrome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Running with 16gb of ram, chrome is committing 15-16gb crashing constantly with "he's dead jim" not sure why this has become a problem all of a sudden. Reinstalled it to see if it fixes it, otherwise I'll need to use mozilla. 

Desktop: Intel 4770k - 12GB Vengeance Pro 1866Mhz RAM - Asus Maximus VI Formula Mobo - Asus Strix 970 SLI - Cooler Master V850 PSU -  Nzxt Phantom 630 Case  - 1TB WD HDD - Samsung 840 Evo 250GB SSD - Nzxt Kraken X60 - 24" Asus VG248QE 1080p Monitor - Logitech G35 Headset -  G502 Proteus Core - Logitech G710+ Keyboard - Nzxt Hue - Windows 10

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't trade blows, trust me. They are both terrible fucking bloated browsers that are just carcasses of how great they used to be. Especially firefox. 

Using Firefox 4 on my ULR (dual Pentium 3) and then updating to the latest showed me that. Same as earlier versions of Chrome and IE 6 (I swear IE6 is the best web browser I have ever used-its just a shame that it was 1 window at a time instead of tabbed).

           .;ldkO0000Okdl;.                michael@SUSE-BlackBox
        .;d00xl:^''''''^:ok00d;.            OS: openSUSE 20260405
      .d00l'                'o00d.          Kernel: x86_64 Linux 6.19.11-1-default
    .d0K^'  Okxoc;:,.          ^O0d.        Uptime: 2d 21h 52m
   .OVVAK0kOKKKKKKKKKKOxo:,      lKO.       Packages: 6556
  ,0VVAKKKKKKKKKKKKK0P^,,,^dx:    ;00,      Shell: bash 5.3.9
 .OVVAKKKKKKKKKKKKKk'.oOPPb.'0k.   cKO.     Resolution: 3840x1080
 :KVAKKKKKKKKKKKKKK: kKx..dd lKd   'OK:     DE: KDE
 lKlKKKKKKKKKOx0KKKd ^0KKKO' kKKc   lKl     WM: KWin
 lKlKKKKKKKKKK;.;oOKx,..^..;kKKK0.  lKl     GTK Theme: Breeze-Dark [GTK2], Breeze [GTK3]
 :KAlKKKKKKKKK0o;...^cdxxOK0O/^^'  .0K:     Icon Theme: breeze-dark
  kKAVKKKKKKKKKKKK0x;,,......,;od  lKP      Disk: 13T / 22T (60%)
  '0KAVKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK00KKOo^  c00'      CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core @ 16x 4.55295GHz
   'kKAVOxddxkOO00000Okxoc;''   .dKV'       GPU: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (radeonsi, navi22, ACO, DRM 3.64, 6.19.11-1-default)
     l0Ko.                    .c00l'        RAM: 13127MiB / 48094MiB
      'l0Kk:.              .;xK0l'          
         'lkK0xc;:,,,,:;odO0kl'             
             '^:ldxkkkkxdl:^'    

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no vivaldi users here?

Tried it, had a few issues, mainly because I had to take the time to change the keyboard shortcuts from things such as "M", "V" and so on-its bloody annoying when your tying and the browser activates one of its shortcuts. Now I'm staying with Chrome as my desktop has no problems with any web browser.

           .;ldkO0000Okdl;.                michael@SUSE-BlackBox
        .;d00xl:^''''''^:ok00d;.            OS: openSUSE 20260405
      .d00l'                'o00d.          Kernel: x86_64 Linux 6.19.11-1-default
    .d0K^'  Okxoc;:,.          ^O0d.        Uptime: 2d 21h 52m
   .OVVAK0kOKKKKKKKKKKOxo:,      lKO.       Packages: 6556
  ,0VVAKKKKKKKKKKKKK0P^,,,^dx:    ;00,      Shell: bash 5.3.9
 .OVVAKKKKKKKKKKKKKk'.oOPPb.'0k.   cKO.     Resolution: 3840x1080
 :KVAKKKKKKKKKKKKKK: kKx..dd lKd   'OK:     DE: KDE
 lKlKKKKKKKKKOx0KKKd ^0KKKO' kKKc   lKl     WM: KWin
 lKlKKKKKKKKKK;.;oOKx,..^..;kKKK0.  lKl     GTK Theme: Breeze-Dark [GTK2], Breeze [GTK3]
 :KAlKKKKKKKKK0o;...^cdxxOK0O/^^'  .0K:     Icon Theme: breeze-dark
  kKAVKKKKKKKKKKKK0x;,,......,;od  lKP      Disk: 13T / 22T (60%)
  '0KAVKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK00KKOo^  c00'      CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core @ 16x 4.55295GHz
   'kKAVOxddxkOO00000Okxoc;''   .dKV'       GPU: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (radeonsi, navi22, ACO, DRM 3.64, 6.19.11-1-default)
     l0Ko.                    .c00l'        RAM: 13127MiB / 48094MiB
      'l0Kk:.              .;xK0l'          
         'lkK0xc;:,,,,:;odO0kl'             
             '^:ldxkkkkxdl:^'    

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of moaning about it you have two really easy options:

1) Install a different browser.

2) Buy more RAM, it's pretty fucking cheap.

 

No. How and why would they ever fix their issues if no-one ever complained about them? There needs to be discussion on every single issue in the world, not just voting on wallets. The devs aren't mind readers.

 

Switching browsers usually just leads to some other issue or lack of functionality anyway. You do realize, people switched to Chrome from other browsers too?

 

And a lot of computers, especially the ones that are used for almost solely for browsing, simply don't have the option of "buy more ram" NUCs, laptops and m-ITXs don't come with an endless supply of DIMM slots. And for the rest of them, getting more ram will only lead to chrome using more ram.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Chrome now since it got released, cause at the time it was the only browser that didn't look like it came with Windows XP. It looked modern and worked great. And it still does for me.

I don't have any problems at all with Chrome. Maybe thats simply because I don't "use" 1337 tabs at the same time.

I also tried Edge a little yesterday, just to see if it is as good as people say. It recommended me to use the Internet Explorer at one point, because it couldn't display a site. So no, definitly not a browser for me. Also it feels slow compared to Chrome.

🇩🇪 🇪🇺 🏴‍☠️ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×