Jump to content

After learning about the new MVMe technology, and how much praise it has been recieving, I am curious why everybody is so excited.  I have seen the read, and the writes, but I have also seen the cost.  Wouldn't it be much more cost efficient, and if done correctly, faster to just stick 4 ssds in raid 0.  It would cost less to have 4 ssds in raid 0that adds up to 480gb than buying the 480gb mvme drive.  I know that the sata bus will be the bottleneck in the future, and we have almost reached that point, but looking at where we are now, I see no reason for the MVMe drives to be public.  Why don't they, they being intel or whoever makes MVMe drives i guess, work on the tech a bit more, make it more cost effective and release them when we have reached the 6Gbps bottleneck of Sata III?

I can help with programming and hardware.

<Script>alert("This website is vulnerable to XSS");</Script>

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/365884-mvme-vs-raid-0/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

NVMe. Because RAID0 is dumb, and very unsafe. This technology is new so it's going to cost a lot for a while, but once it's aged a bit it'll be as cheap if not cheaper than current SSD's.

Spoiler

Prometheus (Main Rig)

CPU-Z Verification

Laptop: 

Spoiler

Intel Core i3-5005U, 8GB RAM, Crucial MX 100 128GB, Touch-Screen, Intel 7260 WiFi/Bluetooth card.

 Phone:

 Game Consoles:

Spoiler

Softmodded Fat PS2 w/ 80GB HDD, and a Dreamcast.

 

If you want my attention quote my post, or tag me. If you don't use PCPartPicker I will ignore your build.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/365884-mvme-vs-raid-0/#findComment-4956039
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

NVMe is not a physical interface, it's an interface protocol like AHCI before it. It's not how the SSD is connected, just how it utilizes that connection. The point is that an SSD on any given link would be faster with NVMe than with AHCI (let alone legacy IDE mode).

 

RAID0 just means you're combining multiple drives with striping. It doesn't change the interface protocol or the physical interface, it just adds them together.

 

Edit: Also, @ this...

 

Why don't they, they being intel or whoever makes MVMe drives i guess, work on the tech a bit more, make it more cost effective and release them when we have reached the 6Gbps bottleneck of Sata III?

 

... we have reached the bottleneck of SATA3. Long ago.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/365884-mvme-vs-raid-0/#findComment-4956093
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

NVMe. Because RAID0 is dumb, and very unsafe. This technology is new so it's going to cost a lot for a while, but once it's aged a bit it'll be as cheap if not cheaper than current SSD's.

 

RAID0 is neither dumb or 'very unsafe'.

 

It gives you increased performance and how often do you find things failing in todays technology? I have had my SSD's in RAID0 for the best part of 2 years now and they are perfect. I just choose not to store any important data on them.

 

 But I agree NVMe > RAID0 sata any day. You loose the sata bottleneck and well as the serial "one at a time" communication that comes with SATA. But for me the most important factor in why NVMe is so much better is not just the increased speeds (2Gb/s+) but the IOPs increase is massive.

 

Also with using SATA to RAID0 you will very quickly hit the bottleneck of SATA and if you are using SSD's you will hit this limit in a 2 SSD array. NVMe removes this bottleneck as its running on a PCIe based connection (with MUCH higher bandwidth than SATA).

Quack 🦆

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/365884-mvme-vs-raid-0/#findComment-4956101
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAID0 is neither dumb or 'very unsafe'.

 

It gives you increased performance and how often do you find things failing in todays technology? I have had my SSD's in RAID0 for the best part of 2 years now and they are perfect. I just choose not to store any important data on them.

 

 But I agree NVMe > RAID0 sata any day. You loose the sata bottleneck and well as the serial "one at a time" communication that comes with sata. But for me the most important factor in why NVMe is so much better is not just the increased speeds (2Gb/s+) but the IOPs increase is massive.

Compared to anything else, RAID0 is dumb. I mean just one of those drives dies and you're screwed. But if you have no other option it's fine.

Spoiler

Prometheus (Main Rig)

CPU-Z Verification

Laptop: 

Spoiler

Intel Core i3-5005U, 8GB RAM, Crucial MX 100 128GB, Touch-Screen, Intel 7260 WiFi/Bluetooth card.

 Phone:

 Game Consoles:

Spoiler

Softmodded Fat PS2 w/ 80GB HDD, and a Dreamcast.

 

If you want my attention quote my post, or tag me. If you don't use PCPartPicker I will ignore your build.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/365884-mvme-vs-raid-0/#findComment-4956113
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAID0 is neither dumb or 'very unsafe'.

 

It gives you increased performance and how often do you find things failing in todays technology? I have had my SSD's in RAID0 for the best part of 2 years now and they are perfect. I just choose not to store any important data on them.

 

 But I agree NVMe > RAID0 sata any day. You loose the sata bottleneck and well as the serial "one at a time" communication that comes with sata. But for me the most important factor in why NVMe is so much better is not just the increased speeds (2Gb/s+) but the IOPs increase is massive.

 

The comparison is kind of useless anyway. You could just as well run NVMe drives in RAID0.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/365884-mvme-vs-raid-0/#findComment-4956124
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×