Jump to content

Graphics PCIE 16 slots

Go to solution Solved by Archangel1994,

Running at 4x there is actually a difference, part of why Nvidia won't allow SLI on 4x

http://images.pugetsystems.com/images/pic_disp.php?id=25616&width=601

 

The FPS difference is within margin of error and these cards ran in both PCIe 2.0 8x (Which is PCIe 3.0 4x) and PCIe 3.0 8/16x. There is no noticeable difference. Nvidia restricts is because SLI is incredibly restricted.

ok I know there are 3 pcir 16 slot settings but can soeone explaine to me x4

 

my friend said that I shouldn't get Matx boards because most of them are X 16 and X4 , ether go full ATX or go ITX

 

I told him I'm running AMD crossfire and not SLI so I don't see  any diffrence so he laughed and called me a noob

 

OK so I started tinkering with PCs this year I'm a bit of a noob so can anyone explain??

what's the diffrence with the X8 and the X4 other then SLI needs X8

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/216804-graphics-pcie-16-slots/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4x means less potential memory bandwidth. However the performance doesn't really degrade at PCIe 3.0 4x (Equal to PCIe 2.0 8x). So really, you will not notice a real difference (A few frames at most).

RIG: I7-4790k @ 4.5GHz | MSI Z97S SLI Plus | 12GB Geil Dragon RAM 1333MHz | Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 970 (1550MHz core/7800MHz memory) @ +18mV(Maxed out at 1650/7800 so far) | Corsair RM750 | Samsung 840 EVO 120GB, 1TB Seagate Barracuda | Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 (Closed) | Sound Blaster Z                                                                                                                        Getting: Noctua NH-D15 | Possible 250GB Samsung 850 Evo                                                                                        Need a console killer that actually shits on every console? Here you go (No MIR/Promo)

This is why you should not get an FX CPU for ANY scenario other than rendering on a budget http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/286142-fx-8350-r9-290-psu-requirements/?p=3892901 http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/266481-an-issue-with-people-bashing-the-fx-cpus/?p=3620861

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/216804-graphics-pcie-16-slots/#findComment-2971931
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all comes down to bandwith. Obivously 16x will provide the most, but consumer (mainstream) grade cpus don't have enough pcie lanes to power two pcie slots at 16x, so a typical board with two pcie 16x gen 3 slots populated will run at 8x 8x mode.

Case: Corsair 4000D Airflow; Motherboard: MSI ZZ490 Gaming Edge; CPU: i7 10700K @ 5.1GHz; Cooler: Noctua NHD15S Chromax; RAM: Corsair LPX DDR4 32GB 3200MHz; Graphics Card: Asus RTX 3080 TUF; Power: EVGA SuperNova 750G2; Storage: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Crucial M500 240GB & MX100 512GB; Keyboard: Logitech G710+; Mouse: Logitech G502; Headphones / Amp: HiFiMan Sundara Mayflower Objective 2; Monitor: Asus VG27AQ

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/216804-graphics-pcie-16-slots/#findComment-2971941
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4x means less potential memory bandwidth. However the performance doesn't really degrade at PCIe 3.0 4x (Equal to PCIe 2.0 8x). So really, you will not notice a real difference (A few frames at most).

Running at 4x there is actually a difference, part of why Nvidia won't allow SLI on 4x

 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/216804-graphics-pcie-16-slots/#findComment-2971956
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what is the diffrence please explain?

Bandwith

Case: Corsair 4000D Airflow; Motherboard: MSI ZZ490 Gaming Edge; CPU: i7 10700K @ 5.1GHz; Cooler: Noctua NHD15S Chromax; RAM: Corsair LPX DDR4 32GB 3200MHz; Graphics Card: Asus RTX 3080 TUF; Power: EVGA SuperNova 750G2; Storage: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Crucial M500 240GB & MX100 512GB; Keyboard: Logitech G710+; Mouse: Logitech G502; Headphones / Amp: HiFiMan Sundara Mayflower Objective 2; Monitor: Asus VG27AQ

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/216804-graphics-pcie-16-slots/#findComment-2971969
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Running at 4x there is actually a difference, part of why Nvidia won't allow SLI on 4x

http://images.pugetsystems.com/images/pic_disp.php?id=25616&width=601

 

The FPS difference is within margin of error and these cards ran in both PCIe 2.0 8x (Which is PCIe 3.0 4x) and PCIe 3.0 8/16x. There is no noticeable difference. Nvidia restricts is because SLI is incredibly restricted.

RIG: I7-4790k @ 4.5GHz | MSI Z97S SLI Plus | 12GB Geil Dragon RAM 1333MHz | Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 970 (1550MHz core/7800MHz memory) @ +18mV(Maxed out at 1650/7800 so far) | Corsair RM750 | Samsung 840 EVO 120GB, 1TB Seagate Barracuda | Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 (Closed) | Sound Blaster Z                                                                                                                        Getting: Noctua NH-D15 | Possible 250GB Samsung 850 Evo                                                                                        Need a console killer that actually shits on every console? Here you go (No MIR/Promo)

This is why you should not get an FX CPU for ANY scenario other than rendering on a budget http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/286142-fx-8350-r9-290-psu-requirements/?p=3892901 http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/266481-an-issue-with-people-bashing-the-fx-cpus/?p=3620861

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/216804-graphics-pcie-16-slots/#findComment-2971972
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×