Jump to content

I'm going to do some testing between CPU based PhysX and GPU based PhysX with Batman Arkham City.

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

<deleted>

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dispite what most people say or think, you can run PhysX on a system with an AMD graphics card, the calculations will be offloaded to the CPU instead of the GPU & the effects will look identical.

I personally tried this on Borderlands 2, set PhysX to high with an Nvidia graphics card installed & with an AMD graphics card installed, the effects look identical the only difference will be performance, in my particular case Borderlands 2 with PhysX set to high was running faster on the CPU but usually, offloading the calculations to the CPU will have a larger impact on performance, depending on how powerful the CPU being used is, with a modern quadcore Intel Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge the performance impact should be very acceptable.

Specs : Core 2 Duo E8400 OCed to 3.41Ghz

Graphics : AMD HD 4870 1GB, Nvidia 8800 GT 1GB

RAM : 6GB .

Link to post
Share on other sites

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw an article on physx and when you moved the physx to CPU, the CPU usage doesn't change at all. I think Nvidia purposely gimped Physx on CPU, right now its not a "cpu is slower" issue, its a "Nvidia is a dick" issue.

Yes, someone who sees it like it really is! ;)  nVidia would not allow PhysX to run better on CPU than on their GPU's, it's gimped so that nV GPU's run it better. nVidia fanboys always cite PhysX as a reason to get an nVidia card, but why? Only a handful of games would benefit from GPU accelerated PhysX, most are offloaded to the CPU. I recall seeing a benchmark where the HD7970 ran a game faster with CPU doing the PhysX work against a GTX680 doing PhysX as well.....can't recall which benchmark though.

 

I have 2x GTX670 2GB in SLi, and if a game doesn't defaults with PhysX enabled, I'd play the game w/o PhysX.....and still enjoy it just as much. Just like I'm playing Metro Last Light w/o Advanced PhysX on my main rig, and yet I'm having a great time playing the game.

 Main Rig: AMD AM4 R7 5700X3D (8C/16T) + TR Phantom Spirit 120 EVO | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme | 2x 16GB Kingston Fury Beast DDR4 3600 | XFX MERC 310 RX 7900 XTX | 256GB Sabrent Rocket NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 3.0 (OS) | 4TB Crucial P310 NVMe M.2 PCIe4x4 | 2TB TG Cardea Zero Z440 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD | 2TB Samsung 860 QVO SATA SSD | 6TB WD Black HDD | CoolerMaster H500M | Corsair HX1000 Platinum | Logitech G915 + G303 Shroud Ed + 8BitDo Ultimate 2.4G | iFi Micro iDSD Black Label | Philips Fidelio B97 | C49HG90DME 49" 32:9 144Hz Freesync 2 | Omnidesk Pro 2020 48" | 64bit Win11 Pro 24H2

2nd Rig: AMD AM4 R9 5900X (12C/24T) + TR PA 120 SE | Gigabyte X570S Aorus Elite AX | 2x 16GB Patriot Viper Elite II DDR4 4000MHz | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT | 500GB Crucial P2 Plus NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 4.0 (OS) | 2TB Adata Legend 850 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 |  2TB Kingston NV2 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Leven JS600 SATA SSD | 2TB Seagate HDD | Logitech G613 + G703 | SOLDAM XR-1 Black Knight | Enermax MAXREVO 1500 | 64bit Win11 Pro 24H2

HTPC: AMD R7 6800H | 32GB DDR5 4800MHz | AMD 680M iGPU | 2TB SSD (2 Partitions 400GB + 1.4TB)) + 1TB SSD | Logitech G613 + G304 | Win11 Pro  24H2

Laptop: Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H - AMD 5800H | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | 680M iGPU | 1TB Kingston NV1 NVMe M.2 (OS) | 4TB Lexar NM790 SSD | Win11 Pro

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought AMD had PhysX but not Advanced PhysX which is the thing everyone wants

 Asus M5A99X Evo  - AMD FX-8350 - 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1866Mhz - Corsair 120mm Quiet Edition Fans BenQ XL2411Z- EVGA GTX 980 Superclocked Fractal Design Define R4 - Corsair H100i - 2 TB 7200rpm HDD - Samsung 840 Evo 120GB - Corsair RM750w PSU - Logitech G502 Proteus Core - Corsair K70 RGB MX Red - Audio Technica M50x + Modmic 4.0 - LG 23EA63V x2


Spinthat Spinthat Spinthat Spinthat

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought AMD had PhysX but not Advanced PhysX which is the thing everyone wants

PhysX is Nvidia proprietary realtime physic engine.

| Intel i7-3770@4.2Ghz | Asus Z77-V | Zotac 980 Ti Amp! Omega | DDR3 1800mhz 4GB x4 | 300GB Intel DC S3500 SSD | 512GB Plextor M5 Pro | 2x 1TB WD Blue HDD |
 | Enermax NAXN82+ 650W 80Plus Bronze | Fiio E07K | Grado SR80i | Cooler Master XB HAF EVO | Logitech G27 | Logitech G600 | CM Storm Quickfire TK | DualShock 4 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dispite what most people say or think, you can run PhysX on a system with an AMD graphics card, the calculations will be offloaded to the CPU instead of the GPU & the effects will look identical.

I personally tried this on Borderlands 2, set PhysX to high with an Nvidia graphics card installed & with an AMD graphics card installed, the effects look identical the only difference will be performance, in my particular case Borderlands 2 with PhysX set to high was running faster on the CPU but usually, offloading the calculations to the CPU will have a larger impact on performance, depending on how powerful the CPU being used is, with a modern quadcore Intel Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge the performance impact should be very acceptable.

Specs : Core 2 Duo E8400 OCed to 3.41Ghz

Graphics : AMD HD 4870 1GB, Nvidia 8800 GT 1GB

RAM : 6GB .

You lie.  It does not look the same.  Check out AMD vs Nvidia Borderlands 2 videos and more on Youtube.  Clearly physX effects are better on Nvidia.

Too many ****ing games!  Back log 4 life! :S

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lie. It does not look the same. Check out AMD vs Nvidia Borderlands 2 videos and more on Youtube. Clearly physX effects are better on Nvidia.

If you set a game setting to high, it will look exactly the same on whatever hardware you run it, the only difference is going to be performance.

In my 1872 posts on this forum I've never even once lied, I might make a mistake but I would never lie, please show some manners sir !

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lie.  It does not look the same.  Check out AMD vs Nvidia Borderlands 2 videos and more on Youtube.  Clearly physX effects are better on Nvidia.

So says the guy who's so obviously a TWIMTBP guy....... :rolleyes:

 Main Rig: AMD AM4 R7 5700X3D (8C/16T) + TR Phantom Spirit 120 EVO | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme | 2x 16GB Kingston Fury Beast DDR4 3600 | XFX MERC 310 RX 7900 XTX | 256GB Sabrent Rocket NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 3.0 (OS) | 4TB Crucial P310 NVMe M.2 PCIe4x4 | 2TB TG Cardea Zero Z440 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD | 2TB Samsung 860 QVO SATA SSD | 6TB WD Black HDD | CoolerMaster H500M | Corsair HX1000 Platinum | Logitech G915 + G303 Shroud Ed + 8BitDo Ultimate 2.4G | iFi Micro iDSD Black Label | Philips Fidelio B97 | C49HG90DME 49" 32:9 144Hz Freesync 2 | Omnidesk Pro 2020 48" | 64bit Win11 Pro 24H2

2nd Rig: AMD AM4 R9 5900X (12C/24T) + TR PA 120 SE | Gigabyte X570S Aorus Elite AX | 2x 16GB Patriot Viper Elite II DDR4 4000MHz | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT | 500GB Crucial P2 Plus NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 4.0 (OS) | 2TB Adata Legend 850 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 |  2TB Kingston NV2 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Leven JS600 SATA SSD | 2TB Seagate HDD | Logitech G613 + G703 | SOLDAM XR-1 Black Knight | Enermax MAXREVO 1500 | 64bit Win11 Pro 24H2

HTPC: AMD R7 6800H | 32GB DDR5 4800MHz | AMD 680M iGPU | 2TB SSD (2 Partitions 400GB + 1.4TB)) + 1TB SSD | Logitech G613 + G304 | Win11 Pro  24H2

Laptop: Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H - AMD 5800H | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | 680M iGPU | 1TB Kingston NV1 NVMe M.2 (OS) | 4TB Lexar NM790 SSD | Win11 Pro

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lie.  It does not look the same.  Check out AMD vs Nvidia Borderlands 2 videos and more on Youtube.  Clearly physX effects are better on Nvidia.

No he's not, the borderlands 2 videos you're talking about are comparisons of PhysX set to "high" or "low" which is off.

You can go to the game settings & enable PhysX on an AMD card just like you do on an Nvidia card, the CPU will do the work, this is well known, google Borderlands 2 PhysX AMD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They both suck. Physics by Havok and etc ... are much better because they don't have the performance hit like AMD and nvidia versions. I mean look at the Physics in BFBC2 and BF3 they are way better than anything from nvidia and it does not make the game slow down to a crawl.

Battlefields Physics are built directly into the frostbite engines, they have had tons of time to play around and improve the physics throughout the battlefield series, just an fyi, bear in mind PhysX is an optional extra.

Cpu: i5-2500k @4.8Ghz, MB: Asus Maximus V Formula, CPU cooler: Be quiet! Dark rock pro 2, GPU: Evga Gtx660 FTW@1.24ghz. Ram: Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1866Mhz, PSU: Be quiet! 730w Semi modular, SSD: Corsair force 3 240Gb, HDD: WD Green 1TB, Case: Nzxt H2 with 4 Corsair SP120's, Win7

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lie.  It does not look the same.  Check out AMD vs Nvidia Borderlands 2 videos and more on Youtube.  Clearly physX effects are better on Nvidia.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzEVixM-L4s

 

Literally the same thing. 

Old shit no one cares about but me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×