Jump to content

In Need of a Replacement Smartphone, Suggestions? (on a budget)

Windows7ge

Hello LTT Forum community, I don't ask for help nearly as much as I used to but phones are not my forte and I haven't a clue where to start so let's just go with what I know.

 

My phone the HTC One A9 is falling apart at the seams, both physically and logically. I'd like to find a sub-$400 replacement either based on Android or alternative Linux distribution. This would be my daily driver so I don't want something experimental/BETA. It has to be predictable/reliable in it's behavior if I go with some random Linux Moblie distribution. I'm also looking for something compact. Phones have gotten significantly larger over the years and it doesn't look like something I can escape so the smaller the better.

 

One important detail: It needs to be compatible with the mobile carrier AT&T in the USA. 4G LTE and if it happens to support whatever comes after 4G LTE that'd be a plus (so I can use it for longer when 4G LTE inevitably gets cut).

 

I'm not a mobile power user. Just about every phone feature I use is limited to:

  • Calling
  • Texting
  • Bluetooth for wireless speakers (headphone jack would be a nice "just in case" feature)
  • Taking relatively basic pictures of things (HDR is a great feature for poor lighting situations which happens a lot)
  • Installing 3rd party apps (Notepad, SFTP clients, Linux CLI agents)
  • Chrome Mobile Browser
  • Calculator
  • OpenVPN Connect so I can connect to my house from anywhere
  • Adobe Acrobat so I can pull up .PDF files of motherboard manuals 😆
  • Androids included E-mail app
  • Flashlight on the back of the phone
  • Couple other less mentionable apps

Feature I really don't need or care about:

  • I don't do any mobile gaming
  • I don't stream videos, youtube, etc.
  • I don't do facetime or other forms of conference calls
  • I don't use PLEX or Spodify
  • I don't use mobile data
  • I don't take selfies
  • I don't edit photos on my phone normally
  • I don't use social media apps (facebook, instagram, twitter, etc)
  • I don't use hotspot for sharing a wireless connection
  • I don't use GPS
  • I don't use any Office applications, or most Google services (maps, play, drive, calendar, etc).

A lot of the features that come with high-end expensive phones I don't need or would use. I don't expect that there is a phone that will tick every single box but the less expensive the better. I know you get what you pay for but a nice balance between reliability, features I know I need, and fair price would be the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, James Evens said:

If you want Linux there is the Pinephone64.

I actually have a early revision PinePhone(64?) that I won in a Den-Fi contest. It's running Mobian but is unfortunately in no way stable unless I missed an official stable launch from Pine themselves with updated hardware. I recently updated mobian myself which I watched it go from beta-mobian to stable-mobian in the repos and this big update fixed some issues but others persisted or caused new issues so...not a daily driver I don't think.

 

34 minutes ago, James Evens said:

Right now I wouldn't care about 5G combability. In Germany it took until 2020 before Deutsche Telekom included LTE into the cheap/pre paid offers.  Thier competitors did it in 2014 which is still 4 years after launch. So unless 5G is treated different I don't expect 5G before 2025 being a thing/reality. Since it will take a while before there is any actual benefit it might be 2028-2030 ish before 5G should be taken as mandatory.

I wanna say I bought this HTC One A9...5 years ago? 6 years ago? If the wireless network stays up until 2028 then i'll probably be thinking upgrade time again anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

A good option I would recommend is either the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G or the Samsung Galaxy 53 5G. the A42 is around $299.99 0n sale at the minute and the A53 5G is on sale for $349.99.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@jaslion @James Evens @David_ballard

With everyone's suggestions right now I'm looking at the Galaxy S20 5G because it's physically the smallest of the line-up and has almost everything else I'm looking for short of a 3.5mm jack but that's not a deal breaker.

 

Right now I'm having trouble verifying that the phone will work with AT&T. All my research is saying that an unlocked version won't work with 5G and that some peoples S20's stopped working when 3G was dropped back in I think February. (like it skipped 4G LTE all-together).

 

Based on everything I'm reading the Internet is pretty divided 50/50 like "Yes it will work", "No it will not". Even AT&T's 3rd party compatibility list doesn't make it immediately clear. An extra few opinions would appreciated before I go looking over the refurb market or something similar because AT&T (at least on their website) want $1,000 dollars for it despite it being over two years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For shits'n'giggles I stopped at AT&T and talked to them about it. I didn't expect answers but I got some information that might be useful.

 

Gal behind the counter pulled out an online compatibility sheet and wrote these down for me (word for word):

G981U
G981U1
G981W

WILL NOT
G981F
G981N
G981O

So there's at least 6 different...version? of the S20 5G and only three of them will supposedly work with AT&T. This explains the Internets ~50/50 yes it works, no it doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, huilun02 said:

The S20 does not strike me as a budget sub-$400 phone

Looking at prices even though it's physically the smallest one of the bunch I did see its out of my price range after the fact.

 

The used market for it based on what I can find is quite sketchy too so I guess I have to abandon it.

 

I found the Galaxy A13 5G which fits well within my budget bought new. The cons being it's quite a bit larger, and the cameras missing features like HDR which sucks but it does have a macro lens which would be a trade-off. None/few of the cons I'm seeing people say about it make it a deal breaker given its a $200 device brand new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×