Jump to content

THE GPU RANGE, THEN & NOW.

Eighjan

I forget if - and, to that end, where - I may have asked in the past, but where did the Vega 56 fit into the market range at the time it was released... and what would be the current equivalent, if prices were at SANE levels...?

 

Sanity of pricing and availability aside (that means that NO; I'm not looking to buy one anytime this side of a lottery win), would a 6600XT or a 6800 be an appropriate equivalent.

I frequently edit any posts you may quote; please check for anything I 'may' have added.

 

Did you test boot it, before you built in into the case?

WHY NOT...?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vega 56 was priced about the same as the 1070 (Ti) on nvidia side, and performed similarly. It was near top end for AMD (Vega 64 holding that spot) but nowhere close to top end nvidia.

 

In terms of positioning the space it took would be about 3070 or 6700 XT ish now, but that probably isn't the best way to look at it if deciding for today.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Eighjan said:

I forget if - and, to that end, where - I may have asked in the past, but where did the Vega 56 fit into the market range at the time it was released... and what would be the current equivalent, if prices were at SANE levels...?

 

Sanity of pricing and availability aside (that means that NO; I'm not looking to buy one anytime this side of a lottery win), would a 6600XT or a 6800 be an appropriate equivalent.

6600XT is faster than Vega 56 by a noticeable amount. 

 

Vega 56 is a bit slower than an RTX 3060.

 

Vega 56 was upper middle range when it was released, fitting between RTX 2060 and RTX 2070.

 

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Light-Yagami said:

6600XT is faster than Vega 56 by a noticeable amount. 

 

Vega 56 is a bit slower than an RTX 3060.

 

Vega 56 was upper middle range when it was released, fitting between RTX 2060 and RTX 2070.

 

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

It's a generation older than nvidia 20 series. From memory it slightly leapfrogged the 1070 when it came out, leading nvidia to release the 1070 Ti as counter. Vega 56 would fall behind 2060, 3060 in use today.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×