Jump to content

Overclocking the i9 10900K

Hi guys,

So a few days ago I got my i9 10900K, but I apparantly I lost the sillicon lottery with this one lol, I was able to achieve 5.1 Ghz semi stable ( only stable in games) at 1.36v using load line calibarition 4. I also overclocked the ring bus from 4.3Ghz to 4.6Ghz but that was about as high as I could go. I have seen a lot of ppl getting 5.2 Ghz eaisly on i9 10900K , so is mine just a bad sample of 10900K ? 5.2 is not even stable at 1.43v in my case so I didn't bother going higher with voltage. Also I didn't change the cpu VCCIO voltage and CPU system agente voltage, they are at default voltage but they seem a bit high to me :s just take a look at this ss: 

not sure if they are supposed to be at such a high voltage by default

the specs:

Asus ROG MAXIMUS APEX XII

i9 10900K

16 GB G.skill Trident Z 4133 Mhz CL19 (upgrading to a faster ram soon)

corsair h150i with thermal grizzly thermal grizzly kryonaut

cooler master h500p mesh case

corsair RM750X 750 watt psu

Looking forward to the reply's 

Thanks !

 

P.S In the picture I sent the CPU VCCIO is at 1.423V by default and system agent cpu is at 1.52V , sorry for the bad quality106294121_575247626505769_496318142072129588_n.thumb.jpg.d7a8698f0be1800ce0d20e006cf9e6dc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea the board will ov a lot on Vccio and Vccia around 1.4v on my hero anyways. Crazy high. 

Generally up to 1.2v is enough.

 

You have a pretty average 14nm Intel processor. OC ranges 5.0-5.3ghz since the past few generations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to hear it.

My i7 8700k was an under performer and it bugged the hell out of me. 

 

In testing my i7 8700k, i7 8086k and a i9 9900k I learned that the big leap in performance was at 5ghz and not much if at all after that. I did not test at 5.3ghz because it is beyond my cooling solution. 

 

What I recommend is to run some game benches at stock. 5ghz and 5.1 to see if there is much of a difference in frames.

It may not be worth overclocking at all if Thermal Velocity Boost is really a thing. 

RIG#1 CPU: AMD, R 7 5800x3D| Motherboard: X570 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 3200 | GPU: EVGA FTW3 ULTRA  RTX 3090 ti | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD#1: Corsair MP600 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 2TB | Monitor: ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ

 

RIG#2 CPU: Intel i9 11900k | Motherboard: Z590 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 3600 | GPU: EVGA FTW3 ULTRA  RTX 3090 ti | PSU: EVGA 1300 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO | Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 | SSD#1: SSD#1: Corsair MP600 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX300 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k C1 OLED TV

 

RIG#3 CPU: Intel i9 10900kf | Motherboard: Z490 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 4000 | GPU: MSI Gaming X Trio 3090 | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD#1: Crucial P1 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k B9 OLED TV

 

RIG#4 CPU: Intel i9 13900k | Motherboard: AORUS Z790 Master | RAM: Corsair Dominator RGB 32GB DDR5 6200 | GPU: Zotac Amp Extreme 4090  | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Streacom BC1.1S | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD: Corsair MP600 1TB  | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k B9 OLED TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't believe the ocs u see online, 5.2 easily doesn't exist, or is some kinda golden bin. 5.1 1.375v is the top bin on SL. The "easy" ocs are usually with an avx offset.

 

https://siliconlottery.com/collections/cometlake/products/10900k51g?variant=32671332728918

 

vccio 1.3v pll 1.15v or 1.2v, not sure about the system agent on z490, 1.5v sounds higher than i remember on other chipsets.

 

I think you have the same ram as i do, cl16 4000 tfaw 280 1.45v works for me (running 3866 1.4v everyday), not gonna get much faster than that and not worth upgrading, unless you are going for 32gb.

 

Also if your gpu pulls 300w with the cpu pulling 300w u might be pushing ur psu hard, so i'd dial the oc back a bit anyway.

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×