Jump to content

Single CCX Ryzen and infinity fabric

Go to solution Solved by Vishera,
Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

it doesn't matter I have I am an enthusiast I buy unlocked hardware and then mess up with it. this is not my personal rig,

But you have a huge overhead,even with my Ryzen 5 2600 sucking 127W i have no problem running my memory at 3466MHz CL16.

Since your CPU is Zen+ like mine you will have trouble getting to 3600MHz anyway,that's usually the limit for Zen+.

does Memory OC preferred over core clock OC on a single CCX AMD Ryzen CPU for gaming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean CPPC? 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TofuHaroto said:

Do you mean CPPC? 

Ryzen 1300X for example?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Single CCX is the better option due to the lower latency.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vishera said:

Single CCX is the better option due to the lower latency.

that why I am asking if memory OC is vital over core clock here for game FPS?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Vishera said:

Single CCX is the better option due to the lower latency.

That's not true 

 

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

that why I am asking if memory OC is vital over core clock here for game FPS?

 

Don't enable CCPC 

It will make you stutter and it won't be a nice experience 

Limiting your self to one ccx on that chip essentially gives you two cores and 4 threads 

 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

that why I am asking if memory OC is vital over core clock here for game FPS?

core clock will benefit you more,but why don't you overclock both?

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

That's not true 

 

Don't enable CCPC 

It will make you stutter and it won't be a nice experience 

Limiting your self to one ccx on that chip essentially gives you two cores and 4 threads 

 

this CPÚ has only CCX for the 4 cores I think. ccorrect me if I was wrong,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

That's not true 

I am talking about overall latency,not RAM latency.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vishera said:

I am talking about overall latency,not RAM latency.

Yes latency I know there is little to know difference

 

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

this CPÚ has only CCX for the 4 cores I think. ccorrect me if I was wrong,

Well zen 1 typically if I remember has equal core arrangements on the ccxs 

Limiting your self to one ccx will not benifit you interms of performance 

Latency won't matter 

But if you are dead set on one ccx 

A core clock is more important because obviously zen 1 FCLK will probably either handle a memory oc or a core clock 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TofuHaroto said:

Yes latency I know there is little to know difference

 

Well zen 1 typically if I remember has equal core arrangements on the ccxs 

Limiting your self to one ccx will not benifit you interms of performance 

Latency won't matter 

But if you are dead set on one ccx 

A core clock is more important because obviously zen 1 FCLK will probably either handle a memory oc or a core clock 

I am not talking about limiting CPUs with multiple CCX to one CCX. that would be really stupid XD. I am talking about ones natively with one CCX only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

. I am talking about ones natively with CCX only

Ohh if you mean which zen cpu has one ccx 

That would be the 3300x 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

Yes latency I know there is little to know difference

The infinity fabric between CCXs adds latency,so with only one CCX that latency is removed and the difference is big:

 

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

Ohh if you mean which zen cpu has one ccx 

That would be the 3300x 

so Ryzen 2000 and 1000 all comes with multiple CCX? I thought they are at a single CCX. well 3300x is a good example but that is a different arch Zen 2 unlike Zen and Zen+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

so Ryzen 2000 and 1000 all comes with multiple CCX? I thought they are at a single CCX. well 3300x is a good example but that is a different arch Zen 2 unlike Zen and Zen+

If I remember correctly it's one CCD 

The 3300x has one ccx and one CCD

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vishera said:

The infinity fabric between CCXs adds latency,so with only one CCX that latency is removed and the difference is big:

 

so does faster memory speed here matter or if we go higher clocks we achieve better performance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

3300x

As far as i know it's the only CPU with a single CCX.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vishera said:

As far as i know it's the only CPU with a single CCX.

aha, but I already own a 3400G and it is single CCX and probably all Ryzen 2000  and 1000 series. anyway, should I crank memory up or core clock is preferred?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Vishera said:

The infinity fabric between CCXs adds latency,so with only one CCX that latency is removed and the difference is big:

Your technically correct I know 

Single ccx should decrease latency but from what I have seen it doesn't well it does but not in a way that you would expect

 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

16 minutes ago, Vishera said:

core clock will benefit you more,but why don't you overclock both?

that is something you should not really ask. either we push memory to limits or CPU to limits. OC both is not possible. one has to be faster at expense of the other 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Islam Ghunym said:

 

that is something you should not really ask. either we push memory to limits or CPU to limits. OC both is not possible. one has to be faster at expense of the other 

That's because of the FCLK sadly 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

so does faster memory speed here matter or if we go higher clocks we achieve better performance?

Faster memory with lower CAS will give better performance regardless,CAS is important for performance,but many people ignore it due to lack of knowledge.

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

aha, but I already own a 3400G and it is single CCX and probably all Ryzen 2000  and 1000 series. anyway,

Just checked it and the G series is a single die without CCXs and chiplets.

Just now, Islam Ghunym said:

either we push memory to limits or CPU to limits. OC both is not possible. one has to be faster at expense of the other 

?!?!?!?!?

That's not how it works,you can overclock both and get a boost in performance greater than overclocking just one of them.

 

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

That's because of the FCLK sadly 

Depends on the frequency of the RAM,the limit is around 3800MHz on the RAM.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vishera said:

Depends on the clock speed,the limit is around 3800MHz on the RAM.

Depends on the core overclock

If you have a heavy overclock 

Overclocking ram will be alot harder

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

Depends on the core overclock

If you have a heavy overclock 

Overclocking ram will be alot harder

That depends on the VRMs,SOC etc,but with 2 dimms or less it shouldn't be a problem.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×