Jump to content

Intel's new "marketing strategy" in China?

Hello guys

 

Soooo...... If I recall correctly, Linus did mention about the following picture in past videos...

 

1213872920_0G5N@UZJ3448YCS2MBKY.jpg.4501989f79e14aa0c7e34088e369ac2e.jpg

 

Basically it's some sort of conference in China and they say i3 9350KF outperform the whole Ryzen 5 family, while 9600KF is faster than 3800X.

Because it's already discussed I'm not going to translate this again... if anyone ask me to do so I will.

 

And suddenly I saw this today, sent by one of my friend.

 

After digging a while I cannot confirm this article is published by Intel's official account on WeChat (a social media platform in China), but looking at the carefully-made references, also the reference to the Intel Ark site at the bottom, I think it's a official marketing information sent to dealers/product distributor or some sort. More on this later.

 

912655361_QQ20200213161127.jpg.3886da9e710ffcba31ffd1b61b434f73.jpg

 

Basically what they say in these paragraphs are:

 

Conclusion

 

Although AMD positioned their AMD Ryzen 5 to compete with Intel Core i5 processors, AMD might as well put Ryzen 9 to compete with Core i9 processors, our performance numbers showed completely different results.

 

In multiple tasks, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X was outperformed by Intel Core i7-9700K, and AMD Ryzen 5 3600X was outperformed by Intel Core i3-9350KF. When customers ask which desktop processor is the better performer in gaming, office use, content creation etc., they can be recommended with the 9th gen Intel Core processors!

 

The line "when customer ask" and "they can be recommended with" made me believe this is the information that was supposed to be sent to dealers, instructing them how to sell Intel products.

 

Nevertheless, having seen the previous picture of that conference, I think it's reasonable to say this is indeed a work of Intel. What I'm trying to say is, including AMD, they all have some misleading information from time to time; but since Intel has been misleading in this whole "i3 beats R5, i5 beats R7" stuff, it's just funny to see a new version of this sort of comparison and it just shows how desperate Intel is.

 

I used to have a 3770K in 2013 and it absolutely smashes my FX8320 in every tasks... I couldn't quite remember but maybe AMD was at the same place as Intel back then, marketing their FX processors as true 8-cores, putting misleading information... The only difference is that AMD is now fightingback. Human always repeats the history, I guess? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

"they can be recommended" doesn't mean "they should". There are less Intel fanboys in the Chinese speaking community, they may still go for Intel but they just admit it's brand loyalty, instead of trying to cover it up with performance like Intel itself.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, there. I'm a digital fan from China, and I know exactly how Intel publicized i3-7350K two years ago. Unfortunately what you say was true, and it repeats in China again. It's so funny what advertising says in China, but someone who expert and was digital fans in China know that what it says was nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jurrunio said:

"they can be recommended" doesn't mean "they should". There are less Intel fanboys in the Chinese speaking community, they may still go for Intel but they just admit it's brand loyalty, instead of trying to cover it up with performance like Intel itself.

I do admit it comes down to people you get in touch with. But what I see around me is that there are still plenty of users who would go Intel rather than AMD. Paying the premium price, they justify it by saying Intel is still the king in terms of gaming and it will push the game a bit further. This is the similar to what you said, that they accept it's a brand loyalty and pay for the price willingly.

 

But I also see many people (especially who are unfamiliar with PC stuff) who listen to marketing like this article I posted and go Intel. This happened multiple times when a friend come to me and say hey, can you build a PC for me? I heard that i7 is good for gaming PCs, can I get that? Then I was like "oh **** here we go again" and explain what Ryzen is to them. After all this, sometimes they would still ask for Intel. Of course I will give them because it's not my money anyway LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fwa_fewa said:

Hello, there. I'm a digital fan from China, and I know exactly how Intel publicized i3-7350K two years ago. Unfortunately what you say was true, and it repeats in China again. It's so funny what advertising says in China, but someone who expert and was digital fans in China know that what it says was nonsense. 

Greetings. I am a Chinese user as well. I posted this just because I think this article is hilarious and want to share this to other people XD. There's also a possibility that maybe I was wrong and someone could point out what's actually happening, but how do I know unless I share it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Valenceins said:

Greetings. I am a Chinese user as well. I posted this just because I think this article is hilarious and want to share this to other people XD. There's also a possibility that maybe I was wrong and someone could point out what's actually happening, but how do I know unless I share it?

XD. You are right. On the other hand, isn't that a sign of Intel's afraid? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×