Jump to content

force 120/144 hz on my laptop

WhyThereIsAPieOverHead

Yesterday i bought a laptop 

msi gf63 thin 9rcx

its screen is originally 60 hz 

and i overclocked it to 100 hz but in it is not showing 1001 or above refresh rates

even though i have set a 120 hz in Custom Resolution utility

can i force set refesh rate if yes , how

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

in custom rez you can even set 240hz, but it will not run over the factory refresh rate, maybe slitght overclock would allow for something like 70hz, but nothing higher, definitly not 120hz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

With all due respect, you are a madman if you think you can get 120hz out of a 60hz display.

You can maybe raise it a little bit (I am surprised you even got 100hz) but overall your screen is designed to work at 60hz and ideally you should leave it at that.

It appears that there is a version of your laptop with a 120hz panel.

If you have the 120hz panel, you just need to switch the refresh to 120hz as Windows will default to 60hz.

Here is how to change the refresh rate in Windows 10:

https://www.windowscentral.com/how-change-monitor-refresh-rate-windows-10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wojtepanik said:

in custom rez you can even set 240hz, but it will not run over the factory refresh rate, maybe slitght overclock would allow for something like 70hz, but nothing higher, definitly not 120hz

i have a 120 hz setting in CRU but it is not showing in display settings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WhyThereIsAPieOverHead said:

i have a 120 hz setting in CRU but it is not showing in display settings

yeah, but you can't phisicly run the display at those refreshrates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WhyThereIsAPieOverHead said:

i have a 120 hz setting in CRU but it is not showing in display settings

If it's not in Windows display settings then your display doesn't support it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, WhyThereIsAPieOverHead said:

Yesterday i bought a laptop 

msi gf63 thin 9rcx

its screen is originally 60 hz 

and i overclocked it to 100 hz but in it is not showing 1001 or above refresh rates

even though i have set a 120 hz in Custom Resolution utility

can i force set refesh rate if yes , how

No, you can not push it that far. Maybe 10tps or so - but better to just leave it at 60hz, as your panel is 60hz

 

MSI B450 Pro Gaming Pro Carbon AC | AMD Ryzen 2700x  | NZXT  Kraken X52  MSI GeForce RTX2070 Armour | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (4*8) 3200MhZ | Samsung 970 evo M.2nvme 500GB Boot  / Samsung 860 evo 500GB SSD | Corsair RM550X (2018) | Fractal Design Meshify C white | Logitech G pro WirelessGigabyte Aurus AD27QD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm stunned if it actually got to 100hz in the first place.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2019 at 7:38 PM, Princess Luna said:

I'm stunned if it actually got to 100hz in the first place.

but i really did and tested 

and its Smooooth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhyThereIsAPieOverHead said:

but i really did and tested 

and its Smooooth

There's a far greater difference going from 60hz to 100hz than 100hz to 144hz... the more refresh rate you have the narrow is the frametimes until it reaches a point it's just so narrow it no longer makes a sensible difference.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Princess Luna said:

There's a far greater difference going from 60hz to 100hz than 100hz to 144hz... the more refresh rate you have the narrow is the frametimes until it reaches a point it's just so narrow it no longer makes a sensible difference.

100hz just looked like 144 hz in my eyes

i compared my laptop with my cousins ausus rog scar ii

except 100hz ghosted more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, WhyThereIsAPieOverHead said:

ghosted more

Your case it's ghosting likely because the screen has a higher GTG lag, which is understandable since it was meant to only drive 60hz.

 

Ghosting is not an effect of refresh rate alone but rather depended on GTG timings, to avoid ghosting you usually need 5ms or lower at 144hz, thing is you can't really trust manufacturers when they say "1ms GTG!" because it's really not always the case:

unknown.png?width=1117&height=629

 

All these monitors have either 1ms or 5ms GTG response time on their marketing but the reality as we can see here is all over the place, the slower GTG the longer it takes a single pixel to switch it's colour entirely and when you've a high refresh rate where it's expected to change its colour very fast it might not keep up causing the ghosting effect...

 

Higher refresh rate won't eliminate ghosting only a lower GTG response time, on the example above that Viotek 144hz screen has more ghosting than the 95hz Pixio screen.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Princess Luna said:

Your case it's ghosting likely because the screen has a higher GTG lag, which is understandable since it was meant to only drive 60hz.

 

Ghosting is not an effect of refresh rate alone but rather depended on GTG timings, to avoid ghosting you usually need 5ms or lower at 144hz, thing is you can't really trust manufacturers when they say "1ms GTG!" because it's really not always the case:

unknown.png?width=1117&height=629

 

All these monitors have either 1ms or 5ms GTG response time on their marketing but the reality as we can see here is all over the place, the slower GTG the longer it takes a single pixel to switch it's colour entirely and when you've a high refresh rate where it's expected to change its colour very fast it might not keep up causing the ghosting effect...

 

Higher refresh rate won't eliminate ghosting only a lower GTG response time, on the example above that Viotek 144hz screen has more ghosting than the 95hz Pixio screen.

how to measure gtg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×