Jump to content

MSI Radeon R9-290X Gaming OC Guru3d review

TOMPPIX

Meet da mighty MSI Radeon R9-290X Gaming OC edition!

wRYUMfy.png

 
DX11
Ultra mode
2x MSAA enabled
16x AF enabled
HBAO enabled
Level: Reach the VIPs

 

sGu8POo.png

 

DirectX 11
Very High Quality settings
FXAA Enabled
Welcome to the Jungle level
 
QpNdMLr.png
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt really call this news, if benchmarks become reviews then i could fill the  news page up in a few minutes

 

The bf4 one cant be correct, nvidia destroys amd in bf4.

cpu: intel i5 4670k @ 4.5ghz Ram: G skill ares 2x4gb 2166mhz cl10 Gpu: GTX 680 liquid cooled cpu cooler: Raijintek ereboss Mobo: gigabyte z87x ud5h psu: cm gx650 bronze Case: Zalman Z9 plus


Listen if you care.

Cpu: intel i7 4770k @ 4.2ghz Ram: G skill  ripjaws 2x4gb Gpu: nvidia gtx 970 cpu cooler: akasa venom voodoo Mobo: G1.Sniper Z6 Psu: XFX proseries 650w Case: Zalman H1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm these benchmarks don't seem very accurate, im wondering if they are max fps not average and what not. Don't know how its possible for a 290x with a custom cooler to beat the 780ti by 25fps of which the original 290x was about 10fps behind the 780ti. 35 fps increase with a custom cooler and an oc at 1200p. I call bullshit

CPU: i5 4670k with Noctua C12P-SE14 GPU: Gigabyte GTX 770 SSD: 250gb Samsung EVO MOBO: MSI Z87-G43 RAM: 8GB G-Skill 1600mhz PSU: Antec HCG 620W CASE: Corsair 300R windowed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those benchmarks seems non accurate & biased. 780ti gets 66 fps on 1920x1200 in hitman absolution? Difference 17 fps between it & R9 290x? What a bullshit!

| CPU: i7 3770k | MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z77A-G45 Gaming | GPU: GTX 770 | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Trident X | PSU: XFX PRO 1050w | STORAGE: SSD 120GB PQI +  6TB HDD | COOLER: Thermaltake: Water 2.0 | CASE: Cooler Master: HAF 912 Plus |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it sounds bizarre, but remember that these are compared to stock frequencies on the 780ti. plus, it's guru3d. they're generally rather reputable anyways.

 

don't forget that the 290X (reference) throttles like something else. so while it can go to 1000mhz, it usually hovers around 820. so the OC is more like the difference between 820 and 1040 (because with custom coolers the hawaii chips don't throttle)

Daily Driver:

Case: Red Prodigy CPU: i5 3570K @ 4.3 GHZ GPU: Powercolor PCS+ 290x @1100 mhz MOBO: Asus P8Z77-I CPU Cooler: NZXT x40 RAM: 8GB 2133mhz AMD Gamer series Storage: A 1TB WD Blue, a 500GB WD Blue, a Samsung 840 EVO 250GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems abit biased, however my personal experience with Nvidia is that they really don't handle 16:10 resolutions as well as they should... they mostly optimize for 16:9.

The 290X starts making sense once you go 1440p or above, really...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Idk about biased, I trust Guru3D a good bit. The numbers may look odd as it is a stock clocked 780 Ti they are using.

9900K  / Noctua NH-D15S / Z390 Aorus Master / 32GB DDR4 Vengeance Pro 3200Mhz / eVGA 2080 Ti Black Ed / Morpheus II Core / Meshify C / LG 27UK650-W / PS4 Pro / XBox One X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Battlefield 4 chart they messed up the colours. The 780 Ti is the light blue, not the 290x.

In case the moderators do not ban me as requested, this is a notice that I have left and am not coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Battlefield 4 chart they messed up the colours. The 780 Ti is the light blue, not the 290x.

 

no if you look at the numbers they're reporting the bar charts are correct.

Daily Driver:

Case: Red Prodigy CPU: i5 3570K @ 4.3 GHZ GPU: Powercolor PCS+ 290x @1100 mhz MOBO: Asus P8Z77-I CPU Cooler: NZXT x40 RAM: 8GB 2133mhz AMD Gamer series Storage: A 1TB WD Blue, a 500GB WD Blue, a Samsung 840 EVO 250GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

no if you look at the numbers they're reporting the bar charts are correct.

 

Nope, it is definitely, positively, irrevokably, 110% incorrect.

 

Or did you think that a slightly overclocked 290x would do 30 FPS more than a reference 290x? Keep dreaming.

In case the moderators do not ban me as requested, this is a notice that I have left and am not coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, it is definitely, positively, irrevokably, 110% incorrect.

Or did you think that a slightly overclocked 290x would do 30 FPS more than a reference 290x? Keep dreaming.

When the reference is throttled so badly and the resulting delta is 300mhz, yes.

Daily Driver:

Case: Red Prodigy CPU: i5 3570K @ 4.3 GHZ GPU: Powercolor PCS+ 290x @1100 mhz MOBO: Asus P8Z77-I CPU Cooler: NZXT x40 RAM: 8GB 2133mhz AMD Gamer series Storage: A 1TB WD Blue, a 500GB WD Blue, a Samsung 840 EVO 250GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, it is definitely, positively, irrevokably, 110% incorrect.

Or did you think that a slightly overclocked 290x would do 30 FPS more than a reference 290x? Keep dreaming.

Maybe I should point out that we're used to overclocked 780ti's around or near 1200mhz, so comparing it at stock is a little misleading.

Daily Driver:

Case: Red Prodigy CPU: i5 3570K @ 4.3 GHZ GPU: Powercolor PCS+ 290x @1100 mhz MOBO: Asus P8Z77-I CPU Cooler: NZXT x40 RAM: 8GB 2133mhz AMD Gamer series Storage: A 1TB WD Blue, a 500GB WD Blue, a Samsung 840 EVO 250GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×