Jump to content

I have a Dell Studio Slim Core 2 Duo which used to run Windows Vista but now runs Windows 10 flawlessly. But I am facing one problem, I want to enable virtualization but cannot find it in the BIOS. I was able to virtualize FreeNAS on it and Windows Vista (1 Core) but what should I do to enable virtualization.

 

I hope I can find a solution then this machine can be given some more love. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1056717-enable-virtualization-on-core-2-duo/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we get an exact model number of your CPU? Sounds like it doesn't support virtualization. You'd be looking for VT-t and/or VT-d in the BIOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2019 at 9:44 PM, ammar_code said:

I have a Dell Studio Slim Core 2 Duo which used to run Windows Vista but now runs Windows 10 flawlessly. But I am facing one problem, I want to enable virtualization but cannot find it in the BIOS. I was able to virtualize FreeNAS on it and Windows Vista (1 Core) but what should I do to enable virtualization.

With my 12 seconds of Googling, I'm going to assume it's an E7400 or similar. These (kind of, see spoiler) support VT-x, which is kinda the bare minimum of virtualization extensions. I don't think VT-d was a thing yet when those were new.

Spoiler

Only some of the E7400s have VT-x, oddly enough. There are two Intel part numbers (AT80571PH0723M and AT80571PH0723ML), and only the 'L' one supports VT-x. There's no external difference between the two that I know of. I don't how common either one is relative to the other.

 

I don't know if CPU-Z shows all supported extensions, or only the ones turned on, but you could start there (under the "Instructions" field on the first screen). Also try the Microsoft Hardware-Assisted Virtualization Detection Tool. It's entirely possible that Dell never bothered with the option (it really only because sort of mainstream-relevant with Win7's XP mode).

 

Opinionated answer: don't virtualize FreeNAS, especially on a system that doesn't support VT-d, unless you know what you're doing. It won't be happy, your data won't be happy, and therefore you won't be happy. You're better off just running Win10 and sharing drives through that (using Storage Spaces to make a pool, if you're so inclined).

Main System (Byarlant): Ryzen 9 5950X | Asus B550-Creator ProArt | EK 240mm Basic AIO | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 3600MT/s CL16 | XFX Speedster SWFT 210 RX 6600 | Samsung 990 PRO 2TB / Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB | Corsair RM750X | StarTech 4× USB 3.0 Card | Realtek RTL8127 10G NIC | Hyte Y60 Case | Dell U3415W Monitor | Keychron K12 Blue (RGB backlight)

 

Laptop (Narrative): Lenovo Flex 5 81X20005US | Ryzen 5 4500U | 16GB DDR4 3200MT/s (soldered) | Vega II 384SP Graphics | SKHynix P31 1TB NVMe SSD | Intel AX200 Wifi | Asus 2.5G USB NIC | Asus ProArt PA278QV | Keychron K4 Brown (white backlight)

 

Proxmox Server (Veda): Ryzen 7 3800XT | ASRock Rack X470D4U | Corsair H80i v2 | 128GB Micron DDR4 ECC 3200MT/s | 2× Samsung PM963a 960GB SSD / 4× WD 10TB / 4× Seagate 14TB Exos / 4× Micron MX500 2TB / 8× WD 12TB (custom external SAS enclosure) | Seasonic Prime Fanless 500W | Intel X550-T2 10G NIC | LSI 9300-8i HBA | Adaptec 82885T SAS Expander | Fractal Design Node 804 Case

 

Proxmox Server (La Vie en Rose)GMKtec Mini PC | Ryzen 7 5700U | 32GB Lexar DDR4 (SODIMM) | Vega II 512SP Graphics | Lexar 1TB 610 Pro SSD | 2× Realtek 8125 2.5G NICs


Media Center/Video Capture (Jesta Cannon): Ryzen 5 1600X | ASRock B450M Pro4 R2.0 | Noctua NH-L12S | 16GB Crucial DDR4 3200MT/s | EVGA GTX750Ti SC | UMIS NVMe SSD 256GB / TEAMGROUP MS30 1TB | Corsair CX450M | Viewcast Osprey 260e Video Capture | TrendNet (AQC107) 10G NIC | LG WH14NS40 BD-ROM | Silverstone Sugo SG-11 Case | Sony XR65A80K

 

Workbench (Doven Wolf): Lenovo m715q | Ryzen Pro 3 2200GE | 16GB Crucial DDR4 3200MT/s (SODIMM) | Vega 8 Graphics | SKHynix (OEM) 256GB NVMe SSD | uni 2.5G USB NIC | HDMI add-in module

 

Network:

Spoiler
                       ┌─────────────── Office/Rack ───────────────────────────────────────────────┐
Google Fiber Webpass ── Cloud Gateway Max ══╦═ Pro XG 8 ══╦═ Flex 2.5-8 ══╦═ Doven Wolf
                      La Vie en Rose (DNS) ═╬═ Narrative  ╠═ Veda-NAS     ╠═ La Vie en Rose (vmbr)
                                Veda (DNS) ─┘             ╠═ Veda (vmbr)  ├─ Ptolemy (vmbr)
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╩═ Ptolemy-NAS  ├─ Veda (Mgmt)
║   ┌ Closet ┐      ┌───────── Bedroom ─────────┐                         └─ Veda (IPMI)
╚═══ Flex XG ══╦╤═══ Flex XG ══╤╦═ Byarlant
       (PoE)   ║│              │╠═ Narrative 
Kitchen Jack ══╣└─ Dual PoE ┐  │╚═ Jesta Cannon*
   (Testing)   ║┌─ Injector ┘  └── Work Laptop
     Bedroom ══╝│        ┌─────── Media Center ────────────────────────────┐
     Jack #2    └──────── Switch 8 ────────────┬─ nanoHD Access Point (PoE)
Notes:                                         ├─ Sony PlayStation 4 
─── is Gigabit / ═══ is Multi-Gigabit          ├─ Pioneer VSX-S520
* = cable passed from Bedroom to Media Center  └─ Sony XR65A80K (Google TV)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ran into this last weekend, was going to throw ESXi on an old Dell Optiplex with a Q9400, and it flat out refuses to install because of an incompatible CPU, even have virtualization (VT-d even) enabled in the BIOS.

 

Best I can tell, you just can't do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it you are trying to do/run?  Running a virtual machine using something like VMWare Player is a big difference than running a full hypervisor.  However, given the generation of the system in question, I'm not sure if either would be worthwhile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in the day CPUs didn’t have dedicated Virtualisation support and the products used a method called ‘binary translation’ to enable virtual machines to work. Nowadays since Virtualization eztensions are built straight into the CPU most virtualisation software has dropped support for binary translation so you can only use it on supported hardware. I could you could run an older hypervisor like ESX3 but there’s really no point doing this 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×