Jump to content

Ive just been told that faster ram limits overclocking, is this true?

 

Would I still be able to hit 5ghz with 4133mhz ram on a 8700K?

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1040700-does-fast-ram-affect-overclocking/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no real world benefits of having memory any faster than 3400mhz CL 14 (best performance ratio).

 

At 4133mhz you'll have bad timings which will result in an over all worse performance, if you just want to do it for bragging rights and what not it'll depend on how good your CPU silicon is and how good your Motherboard is also... without obviously mentioning you'll need highly binned memory.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Princess Cadence said:

There are no real world benefits of having memory any faster than 3400mhz CL 14 (best performance ratio).

 

At 4133mhz you'll have bad timings which will result in an over all worse performance, if you just want to do it for bragging rights and what not it'll depend on how good your CPU silicon is and how good your Motherboard is also... without obviously mentioning you'll need highly binned memory.

 

Im not sure that is what I asked?

 

Also i've read a few articles which directly contradict what you're saying, i'll see if I can find one...

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, remus243 said:

You can still hit 5GHz on your 8700K with that RAM.  Should see a small FPS increase as well, over 3200 for example..

 

 

"Do what makes the experience better" - in regards to PCs and Life itself.

 

Onyx: Ryzen 7 7800X3D / Gigabyte B650 AORUS Pro AX / ASRock Taichi 7900xtx OC / G. Skill Flare X5 6000CL36 64GB (4x16GB) / Samsung 980 1TB x3 / Super Flower Leadex V Plat Pro 1000 / EK-AIO 360 Basic w/ Silent Wings fans / Fractal Design North XL (black mesh) / LG - UltraGear 45" OLED QHD 240Hz / Mackie CR5BT / SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro / Cherry MX Board 3.0 / Logitech G502 - https://valid.x86.fr/my9nnr

 

7800X3D - PBO +200, CO -30 all cores, 4.90GHz all core, 5.05GHz single core, Cinebench 23: 18401 multi, 1779 single

 

Khaleesi: Ryzen 5 5600X3D (+200, -30) - ASRock B550M Pro4 - G. Skill Ripjaws V 16GB 3200CL16 - Asus Prime 9060XT 16GB - Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial MX500 1TB - Cudy AX3000 PCIe Wifi 6 - EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2 - Thermalright Frozen Notte RGB 360 White V2 - NZXT H6 Flow RGB White - LG 34" 3440x1440

 

NAS/Plex/Game Server  Ryzen 9 5900XT 16c/32t - Gigabyte B550M AORUS Elite AX - TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan 64GB 3200CL16 - MSI 1050Ti 4GB - Crucial P3 Plus 500GB + TeamGroup MP44L 2TB (Game) + WD Red Plus 4TBx2 (Plex) - TP-Link AC1200 PCIe Wifi - EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2 - Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE - ASUS Prime AP201 - Currently Hosting: Enshrouded x2, Hytale, Icarus, Windrose. Project Zomboid, Dune Awakening.

 

Sage: Ryzen 7 7800X3D (+200, -30) - Gigabyte B650 Gaming X V2 - ASRock Steel Legend 7900GRE - G. Skill Flare X5 32GB 6000CL32 - TeamGroup MP44L 2TB - Super Flower Leadex Platinum SE 1000w - NZXT H5 Elite

 

Emma: i9 9900K @5.2Ghz - Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - MSI 6900XT Gaming X Trio - G. Skill Ripjaws V 32GB 3200CL16 - 750 EVO 512GB + 2x 860 EVO 1TB (RAID0) - Super Flower Combat FG 850w - Thermaltake Water 3.0 Ultimate 360 - Fractal Design Define R6 - TP-Link AC1900 PCIe Wifi

 

GF Rig: Steam Deck 512GB OLED, Vizio 43" 4K TV

 

Extra parts: ASUS 6650XT - Gigabyte 1080Ti - Cooler Master Q300L - Gigabyte 450w PSU - Super Flower Leadex V Plat Pro 850w

 

OnePlus Ecosystem: 

OnePlus 11 5G - 16GB RAM, 256GB NAND, Eternal Green. OnePlus Watch 2 - Radiant Steel, OnePlus Buds Pro 2 - Eternal Green

3D Printing: 

Bambu Lab X1 Carbon, AMS, AMS2 Pro (thank you MicroCenter!)

Other Interesting Tech:

- 2021 Volvo S60 Recharge T8 PHEV Polestar Engineered - 415hp/495tq 2.0L 4cyl. turbocharged, supercharged and electrified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

There are no real world benefits of having memory any faster than 3400mhz CL 14 (best performance ratio).

 

At 4133mhz you'll have bad timings which will result in an over all worse performance, if you just want to do it for bragging rights and what not it'll depend on how good your CPU silicon is and how good your Motherboard is also... without obviously mentioning you'll need highly binned memory.

I agree on this note.  Ill take tighter timings over Mhz speed any day.  The CPU can only welcome in a certain ammount of data at once.  3200Mhz is more then enough ,, even 2400 is fine and will actually give better latency.

Asus Sabertooth x79 / 4930k @ 4500 @ 1.408v / Gigabyte WF 2080 RTX / Corsair VG 64GB @ 1866 & AX1600i & H115i Pro @ 2x Noctua NF-A14 / Carbide 330r Blackout

Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface / KRK Rokits 10" / Sennheiser HD 650 / Logitech G Pro Wireless Mouse & G915 Linear & G935 & C920 / SL 88 Grand / Cakewalk / NF-A14 Int P12 Ex
AOC 40" 4k Curved / LG 55" OLED C9 120hz / LaCie Porsche Design 2TB & 500GB / Samsung 950 Pro 500GB / 850 Pro 500GB / Crucial m4 500GB / Asus M.2 Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

But im not really asking this, i'm asking if having fast ram has a measurable impact on stable cpu overlock?

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

At 4133mhz you'll have bad timings which will result in an over all worse performance

that's not true, 4133mhz CL17/18 is ALOT faster than 3400 CL14, but it won't do a damn thing if you don't have a CPU that can chew through all that data.

Quote or Tag people so they know that you've replied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does hurt CPU core and uncore frequency a bit, because faster memory means data gets shoved into the CPU faster, so the CPU has more work to do. More work = more likely to crash dodgy settings.It's nowhere near as significant as on Core i compared to Ryzen, but it is something

 

14 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

There are no real world benefits of having memory any faster than 3400mhz CL 14 (best performance ratio).

In terms of buying memory, yes. Running memory though, faster is always better (though not XMP settings on 4000MHz+ kits, those are garbage)

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you jstudrawa and Jurrunio for answering my question ❤️

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, jstudrawa said:

You can still hit 5GHz on your 8700K with that RAM.  Should see a small FPS increase as well, over 3200 for example..

 

 

This is a really good video and as I game at 1080, that is the sweet spot at 4133Mhz. I mostly want it to help with the FPS low drops.

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

There are no real world benefits of having memory any faster than 3400mhz CL 14 (best performance ratio).

 

At 4133mhz you'll have bad timings which will result in an over all worse performance, if you just want to do it for bragging rights and what not it'll depend on how good your CPU silicon is and how good your Motherboard is also... without obviously mentioning you'll need highly binned memory.

 

3 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

I agree on this note.  Ill take tighter timings over Mhz speed any day.  The CPU can only welcome in a certain ammount of data at once.  3200Mhz is more then enough ,, even 2400 is fine and will actually give better latency.

Remember that timings are based on clock cycles. A higher number does not necessarily mean worse latency. For example, a DDR4-4000 module with a CAS latency of 18 has worse latency than a DDR4-4266 module with a CAS latency of 19. Even the difference between DDR4-3200 with a CAS latency of 14 isn't tons better than the DDR4-4266 (we're talking like 8 picoseconds of difference)

 

4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

It does hurt CPU core and uncore frequency a bit, because faster memory means data gets shoved into the CPU faster, so the CPU has more work to do. More work = more likely to crash dodgy settings.It's nowhere near as significant as on Core i compared to Ryzen, but it is something

 

In terms of buying memory, yes. Running memory though, faster is always better (though not XMP settings on 4000MHz+ kits, those are garbage)

The only reason why Zen is sensitive to memory speed is because the intra-processor communication speed is tied to MemClk. The intraprocessor communication bus is independent of MemClk on Intel CPUs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think this will be a thing for Zen 2?

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, remus243 said:

Do you think this will be a thing for Zen 2?

Processor performance being sensitive to memory speed? Probably, since AMD doesn't look like they're budging from the Infinity Fabric design any time soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, remus243 said:

This is a really good video and as I game at 1080, that is the sweet spot at 4133Mhz. I mostly want it to help with the FPS low drops.

what you should look for comparisons is 4133 CL19 versus say 3733 CL14, there's a reason why people use lower frequency but much shorter timings for benchmark competitions

 

2 minutes ago, remus243 said:

Do you think this will be a thing for Zen 2?

If AMD stick to their stupid idea of linking memory frequency to uncore (infinity fabric) frequency, yes.

 

6 minutes ago, Mira Yurizaki said:

The only reason why Zen is sensitive to memory speed is because the intra-processor communication speed is tied to MemClk. The intraprocessor communication bus is independent of MemClk on Intel CPUs.

and then also include a weak memory controller comparable to X99, excellent job there AMD

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats disappointing I bought this RAM as a part I wanted to carry over to the next generation if zen 2 is as good as its being hyped

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Jurrunio said:

what you should look for comparisons is 4133 CL19 versus say 3733 CL14, there's a reason why people use lower frequency but much shorter timings for benchmark competitions

 

If AMD stick to their stupid idea of linking memory frequency to uncore (infinity fabric) frequency, yes.

 

and then also include a weak memory controller comparable to X99, excellent job there AMD

 

What ram would you recommend?

(Link or kit name plx)

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, remus243 said:

Thats disappointing I bought this RAM as a part I wanted to carry over to the next generation if zen 2 is as good as its being hyped

you can still use it on Zen 2, just different settings. Currently on Ryzen with sticks this good, you just set frequency to 2933 (1st gen) or 3466 (2nd gen) (these are as fast as their memory controllers are usually good for), then slam the timings down as much as possible. This will be the same tactic on Zen 2 if AMD doesn't fix it.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, remus243 said:

But im not really asking this, i'm asking if having fast ram has a measurable impact on stable cpu overlock?

Nothing to do with it.  RAM and CPU have nothing to do each other as far as OCing.  If you OC your CPU your stressing your CPU, and if you overclock the RAM or downclock and tighten timings your stressing your RAM.  You can put a 2133 kit and be just fine, I promise you wont see difference in anything except benchmarks.  As I said CPU can only welcome certain amount and speed at once, and DDR4 starting with 2133 and 2400 is fine.  I mean their coming out with DDR5 6400Mhz ,, so you telling me double the MHz equals 30fps more in a game ?  Nope not oa chance.  maybe 5 fps more compared to DDR4 2400Mhz.

Asus Sabertooth x79 / 4930k @ 4500 @ 1.408v / Gigabyte WF 2080 RTX / Corsair VG 64GB @ 1866 & AX1600i & H115i Pro @ 2x Noctua NF-A14 / Carbide 330r Blackout

Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface / KRK Rokits 10" / Sennheiser HD 650 / Logitech G Pro Wireless Mouse & G915 Linear & G935 & C920 / SL 88 Grand / Cakewalk / NF-A14 Int P12 Ex
AOC 40" 4k Curved / LG 55" OLED C9 120hz / LaCie Porsche Design 2TB & 500GB / Samsung 950 Pro 500GB / 850 Pro 500GB / Crucial m4 500GB / Asus M.2 Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the big secret about RAM that the sellers don't want you to know. Or the companies that make the DDR4 RAM kits.  Just because its 3200Mhz or 4000Mhz you will get the same real world performance.  So 4000Mhz to DDR5 6400Mhz your telling me your system would improve in speed, I beg to differ.

Asus Sabertooth x79 / 4930k @ 4500 @ 1.408v / Gigabyte WF 2080 RTX / Corsair VG 64GB @ 1866 & AX1600i & H115i Pro @ 2x Noctua NF-A14 / Carbide 330r Blackout

Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface / KRK Rokits 10" / Sennheiser HD 650 / Logitech G Pro Wireless Mouse & G915 Linear & G935 & C920 / SL 88 Grand / Cakewalk / NF-A14 Int P12 Ex
AOC 40" 4k Curved / LG 55" OLED C9 120hz / LaCie Porsche Design 2TB & 500GB / Samsung 950 Pro 500GB / 850 Pro 500GB / Crucial m4 500GB / Asus M.2 Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Turtle Rig said:

Nothing to do with it.  RAM and CPU have nothing to do each other as far as OCing.  If you OC your CPU your stressing your CPU, and if you overclock the RAM or downclock and tighten timings your stressing your RAM.  You can put a 2133 kit and be just fine, I promise you wont see difference in anything except benchmarks.  As I said CPU can only welcome certain amount and speed at once, and DDR4 starting with 2133 and 2400 is fine.  I mean their coming out with DDR5 6400Mhz ,, so you telling me double the MHz equals 30fps more in a game ?  Nope not oa chance.  maybe 5 fps more compared to DDR4 2400Mhz.

Did you watch the video jstudrawa posted, clearly shows an fps difference at 1080.

 

Also I disagree that it has nothing to do with it, the memory controller is in the cpu and it has to handle extra data so it is more likely to heat up.

Monitor: Alienware AW2518HF CPU: 9900K @ 5.1GHz Heatsink: 2x360MM Custom Loop GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO RAM: Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 2x8GB 4400Mhz Mobo: Asus Maximus XI Gene Case: Fractal Design Meshify S2 PSU: Corsair RM1000x Storage: Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M.2, Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 256GB M.2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, remus243 said:

Did you watch the video jstudrawa posted, clearly shows an fps difference at 1080.

 

Also I disagree that it has nothing to do with it, the memory controller is in the cpu and it has to handle extra data so it is more likely to heat up.

Well yes your right, you have to keep the RAM to check, and not overclock with the multi,, just use XMP.  It just its not a dramatic increase but your right there is a difference.  Most will not notice unless they have stats and see its 10fps more or 15fps more.

Asus Sabertooth x79 / 4930k @ 4500 @ 1.408v / Gigabyte WF 2080 RTX / Corsair VG 64GB @ 1866 & AX1600i & H115i Pro @ 2x Noctua NF-A14 / Carbide 330r Blackout

Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface / KRK Rokits 10" / Sennheiser HD 650 / Logitech G Pro Wireless Mouse & G915 Linear & G935 & C920 / SL 88 Grand / Cakewalk / NF-A14 Int P12 Ex
AOC 40" 4k Curved / LG 55" OLED C9 120hz / LaCie Porsche Design 2TB & 500GB / Samsung 950 Pro 500GB / 850 Pro 500GB / Crucial m4 500GB / Asus M.2 Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO , 3200Mhz and DDR5 6400Mhz Doesn't mean your sh*T is gonna be twice as fast ya know...… As you or the other chap said yes memory controller all that stuff is important how it behaves with CPU.  Im just saying you can have bad ram and still raise the multi and go with XMP and proper timings as well.

Asus Sabertooth x79 / 4930k @ 4500 @ 1.408v / Gigabyte WF 2080 RTX / Corsair VG 64GB @ 1866 & AX1600i & H115i Pro @ 2x Noctua NF-A14 / Carbide 330r Blackout

Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface / KRK Rokits 10" / Sennheiser HD 650 / Logitech G Pro Wireless Mouse & G915 Linear & G935 & C920 / SL 88 Grand / Cakewalk / NF-A14 Int P12 Ex
AOC 40" 4k Curved / LG 55" OLED C9 120hz / LaCie Porsche Design 2TB & 500GB / Samsung 950 Pro 500GB / 850 Pro 500GB / Crucial m4 500GB / Asus M.2 Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×