Need suggestions to optimize pc settings/pc hardware

[Dandapani]

Trying to get stable fps while playing Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. 

Currently running the game at high/very high video preset gets me upto 50 fps.

but the frame rate drops when i visit cities. 

 

Do i need to upgrade to 16 gb ram? 

As i am using B360 pro i can only use 2666mhz ddr4 ram (i have currently installed crucial 2400mhz 8gb).

 

Will adding more ram help stabilise the fps in cities ?

 

Pc-specs:

i5 8400

B360 pro vdh

gtx 1060-3gb

8gb ram-2400mhz

[19_blackie_73]

Other question: is your ram usage close to the 8GB?

[glenalz81]

Is your Ram running in single channel?  Just one stick? i

[Mattias Edeslatt]

Now i'm not an avid gamer but my best bet is that you have to little VRAM and/or to weak GPU for the game at high graphics setting. 

 

In villages the textures normally have greater details, and there generally are more textures over all, reflections, objects/NPC and so on.

 

If you look at the more recent tests of the AMD RX590 that tests against 1060 (3 & 6 GB cards) it wins almost every test just because it have 8 GB VRAM and can handle more textures and data than the 1060 and a 1060 6 GB is of course a better performer than the 3 GB variant and it's not the 128 extra CUDA cores that the 6 GB have that makes the difference in performance between the two modells.

 

Lower the quality on the textures and you wont drop frames or keep the quality and lower the resolution. Those are your options with that card. 

[Dandapani]

On 12/28/2018 at 12:29 PM, Mattias Edeslatt said:

Now i'm not an avid gamer but my best bet is that you have to little VRAM and/or to weak GPU for the game at high graphics setting. 

 

In villages the textures normally have greater details, and there generally are more textures over all, reflections, objects/NPC and so on.

 

If you look at the more recent tests of the AMD RX590 that tests against 1060 (3 & 6 GB cards) it wins almost every test just because it have 8 GB VRAM and can handle more textures and data than the 1060 and a 1060 6 GB is of course a better performer than the 3 GB variant and it's not the 128 extra CUDA cores that the 6 GB have that makes the difference in performance between the two modells.

 

Lower the quality on the textures and you wont drop frames or keep the quality and lower the resolution. Those are your options with that card. 

I just updated my graphic card, and i let GeForce Experience optimize the game(wasn’t optimized before) let me give it a try.

also i will try to check the ram performance 

 

On 12/28/2018 at 2:53 AM, 19_blackie_73 said:

Other question: is your ram usage close to the 8GB?

Ram usage is nearly 5.5gb

[Mateus Montemor]

Not really, AC Origins is just a bad optimized game, even a 1070 can drop below 60 fps on high settings,sadly i think thats the max performance u will get with that gpu

[Mateus Montemor]

PS: Be careful, dont use GeForce experience optimize your games, it will just put everything on max possible not caring for 60 fps+

[dgsddfgdfhgs]

i5 6core isnt good for this game's ultra poor optimization. even my r7 1700 spikes at 70%+ and 40% avg at cpu usage. 

you also need to tune graphics setting one by one. those effects are costing too much at un noticeable results, watch some youtube guides on that will help

[Dandapani]

As my ram usage is upto 5.5-6 gb should I upgrade to 16gb?

will it make any large difference to fps?