Jump to content

Core 2 quad ok for modern gaming?

Go to solution Solved by jackm1120,

no core 2 quad will hold up well against triple a titles

So I'm helping my friend get a gaming pc for chrap.  I found out through eBay, it is indeed possible to get a pc with a gtx 760, 8 gb ram, core 2 quad, and a 500 gb hard drive for 200 dollars.  He wants to play modern day games such as fallout 4 just cause 3 gta 5 etc.  I was wondering how a core 2 quad would perform with these games and how much it would bottleneck the gtx 760.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3GHz 65nm C2Q, barely. 3GHz 45nm C2Q, yes. And there would be no bottleneck with a 45nm C2Q (although if you can get a Xeon X5450+motherboard for the socket mod, that's the way you should go).

 

Edit: And I say that after using my QX6850 and Xeon X5450 with my GTX 650ti OC 2GB.

"We also blind small animals with cosmetics.
We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals."

 

"Please don't mistake us for Equifax. Those fuckers are evil"

 

This PSA brought to you by Equifacks.
PMSL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 cores is pretty rough for any game nowadays. Go for the Q6600 if you really are on a budget.

 

Hope this helps :P

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600x 4.9Ghz PBO    SSDs: 250GB 850 Pro           STEAM: KezzaMcFezza
GPU: GTX 1070 Strix                                     250GB 970 Pro           MOBO: MSI MPG B550 Gaming Plus

HDD: 1TB WD Black Drive                             500GB 860 Evo          MOUSE: Logitech G502

                                                                                                                                                                                               

                       

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ProKeero said:

2 cores is pretty rough for any game nowadays. Go for the Q6600 if you really are on a budget.

 

Hope this helps :P

Yea the core 2 quad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, smeek14 said:

Yea the core 2 quad!

Lol did i read that wrong xD, yea that CPU is fine xD. *embarrassment intensifies*

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600x 4.9Ghz PBO    SSDs: 250GB 850 Pro           STEAM: KezzaMcFezza
GPU: GTX 1070 Strix                                     250GB 970 Pro           MOBO: MSI MPG B550 Gaming Plus

HDD: 1TB WD Black Drive                             500GB 860 Evo          MOUSE: Logitech G502

                                                                                                                                                                                               

                       

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For $200 that is a great deal, really depends on the Core 2 Quad and if it is a 65nm or 45nm model. You would also be looking at the motherboard in terms of possibly overclocking or upgrades. For GTA V you would be quite surprised how well it can run even on a Q6600 (oldest/slowest Core 2 Quad). I paired one with a GTX 650ti and going to with a GTX 760 later this year when I have the time again. Personally I think that system will be more than fine but more details on it such as exact parts would be nice, I have been using and messing around with the LGA 775 platform for a while and personally can not agree with the best answer you chose so hopefully you can reconsider that purchase and let me know what other information you might want regarding what you might be looking at. :)  

A shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man who does not exist.

 

Core 4 Quad Not Extreme, only available on LGA 557 at your local Circuit City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jackm1120 said:

no core 2 quad will hold up well against triple a titles

Can you please point out exactly which titles and provide some proof to why the Core 2 Quads can't "hold up well" with triple a titles? 

A shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man who does not exist.

 

Core 4 Quad Not Extreme, only available on LGA 557 at your local Circuit City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your mileage will vary with the C2Q, even the 45nm ones.  Less CPU intensive games will run fine, but for GTA V and Just Cause 3, you may have to really compensate to get it running smoothly.  

$200 isn't that bad for that system though, the GPU alone is probably worth $120.  If it has a decent PSU and case, you could always salvage it for a newer setup.  I'd say take a shot on it if your willing to upgrade in a couple of years, or if you have a means to sell some parts later.

 

Personally though, another $100 could go a long way.  You should really have sandy bridge at minimum for gaming.  i5 2400's go for pretty cheap, or you could look at upgrading an used dell optiplex.  Either that or build a new skylake system with a g4400 and plan on upgrading that later.  Then pair whatever you get with a gtx 670/760/7870 (best $100 options).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, iHardware Shelden said:

For $200 that is a great deal, really depends on the Core 2 Quad and if it is a 65nm or 45nm model. You would also be looking at the motherboard in terms of possibly overclocking or upgrades. For GTA V you would be quite surprised how well it can run even on a Q6600 (oldest/slowest Core 2 Quad). I paired one with a GTX 650ti and going to with a GTX 760 later this year when I have the time again. Personally I think that system will be more than fine but more details on it such as exact parts would be nice, I have been using and messing around with the LGA 775 platform for a while and personally can not agree with the best answer you chose so hopefully you can reconsider that purchase and let me know what other information you might want regarding what you might be looking at. :)  

I'm just buying an old dell optiplex off of ebay, and adding a 500 gb hhd, 8gb ram, and a gtx 760.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Biggerboot said:

Your mileage will vary with the C2Q, even the 45nm ones.  Less CPU intensive games will run fine, but for GTA V and Just Cause 3, you may have to really compensate to get it running smoothly.  

$200 isn't that bad for that system though, the GPU alone is probably worth $120.  If it has a decent PSU and case, you could always salvage it for a newer setup.  I'd say take a shot on it if your willing to upgrade in a couple of years, or if you have a means to sell some parts later.

 

Personally though, another $100 could go a long way.  You should really have sandy bridge at minimum for gaming.  i5 2400's go for pretty cheap, or you could look at upgrading an used dell optiplex.  Either that or build a new skylake system with a g4400 and plan on upgrading that later.  Then pair whatever you get with a gtx 670/760/7870 (best $100 options).

Ok.  Yea I was worried about the cpu.  I'll see what I can get for 300.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, smeek14 said:

For starters you'll need from that:

  • A new case
  • A non Dell motherboard
  • At least a 4GB DDR3 stick

Looking at the shipping on it, price the cost of an i5 2400+motherboard, than compare their price+shipping to that of the Dell. Because you won't get much that is actually useful from the thin Dell pre-builts.

"We also blind small animals with cosmetics.
We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals."

 

"Please don't mistake us for Equifax. Those fuckers are evil"

 

This PSA brought to you by Equifacks.
PMSL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, smeek14 said:

Dell uses proprietary fan headers so you cannot just replace the fan, but yo will have to replace it, and the psu is a special form factor (tfx?) and will not have any pcie connectors.

 

newegg refurbished computers have a bit of 2400's and ocassionally they have good deals on some of the dell workstation computers, but you may have to do a bit a research to determine what the cpu is in them and what that is comparable to. 

 

 •E5-2670 @2.7GHz • Intel DX79SI • EVGA 970 SSC• GSkill Sniper 8Gb ddr3 • Corsair Spec 02 • Corsair RM750 • HyperX 120Gb SSD • Hitachi 2Tb HDD •

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do go the optiplex route, get the MT version so you can get a full sized GPU and replace the power supply.  Or you can go for the 6 pinless GTX 950.

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Optiplex-Computer-Intel-Core-i5-2400-3-10-Ghz-w-500-GB-HD-4-GB-RAM-DVD-RW-D-/131793719471?hash=item1eaf8490af:g:KAoAAOSwxp9W3ty4

 

I know some would shun me for even recommending such a thing, because the airflow in these aren't the best.  But if you keep it maintained/dust free, it can be a cheap way to get your friend into gaming.  I gamed on an HP Compaq (sff) for a while with a sandy bridge i3 and gtx 750 ti, and it was a lot better than my core 2 quad.

 

Otherwise, keep hunting.  Used but useful sandy/ivy bridge systems are out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Biggerboot said:

If you do go the optiplex route, get the MT version so you can get a full sized GPU and replace the power supply.  Or you can go for the 6 pinless GTX 950.

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Optiplex-Computer-Intel-Core-i5-2400-3-10-Ghz-w-500-GB-HD-4-GB-RAM-DVD-RW-D-/131793719471?hash=item1eaf8490af:g:KAoAAOSwxp9W3ty4

 

I know some would shun me for even recommending such a thing, because the airflow in these aren't the best.  But if you keep it maintained/dust free, it can be a cheap way to get your friend into gaming.  I gamed on an HP Compaq (sff) for a while with a sandy bridge i3 and gtx 750 ti, and it was a lot better than my core 2 quad.

 

Otherwise, keep hunting.  Used but useful sandy/ivy bridge systems are out there.

Is the gtx 750 ti fanless?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would OC it but yeah it should do fine with GTX 760! :D

Lake-V-X6-10600 (Gaming PC)

R23 score MC: 9190pts | R23 score SC: 1302pts

R20 score MC: 3529cb | R20 score SC: 506cb

Spoiler

Case: Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Case Fan(s) Front: Noctua NF-A14 ULN 140mm Premium Fans / Case Fan(s) Rear: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (red) / Case Fan(s) Side: Noctua NF-A6x25 FLX 60mm Premium Fan / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / CPU: Intel Core i5-10600, 6-cores, 12-threads, 4.4/4.8GHz, 13,5MB cache (Intel 14nm++ FinFET) / Display: ASUS 24" LED VN247H (67Hz OC) 1920x1080p / GPU: Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC @1501MHz (Samsung 14nm FinFET) / Keyboard: Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B460 PLUS, Socket-LGA1200 / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W / RAM A1, A2, B1 & B2: DDR4-2666MHz CL13-15-15-15-35-1T "Samsung 8Gbit C-Die" (4x8GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Sound: Zombee Z300 / Storage 1 & 2: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD / Storage 3: Seagate® Barracuda 2TB HDD / Storage 4: Seagate® Desktop 2TB SSHD / Storage 5: Crucial P1 1000GB M.2 SSD/ Storage 6: Western Digital WD7500BPKX 2.5" HDD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN851N 11n Wireless Adapter (Qualcomm Atheros)

Zen-II-X6-3600+ (Gaming PC)

R23 score MC: 9893pts | R23 score SC: 1248pts @4.2GHz

R23 score MC: 10151pts | R23 score SC: 1287pts @4.3GHz

R20 score MC: 3688cb | R20 score SC: 489cb

Spoiler

Case: Medion Micro-ATX Case / Case Fan Front: SUNON MagLev PF70251VX-Q000-S99 70mm / Case Fan Rear: Fanner Tech(Shen Zhen)Co.,LTD. 80mm (Purple) / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 125w Thermal Solution / CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 6-cores, 12-threads, 4.2/4.2GHz, 35MB cache (T.S.M.C. 7nm FinFET) / Display: HP 24" L2445w (64Hz OC) 1920x1200 / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: ASUS Radeon RX 6600 XT DUAL OC RDNA2 32CUs @2607MHz (T.S.M.C. 7nm FinFET) / Keyboard: HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic) / Motherboard: ASRock B450M Pro4, Socket-AM4 / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W / RAM A2 & B2: DDR4-3600MHz CL16-18-8-19-37-1T "SK Hynix 8Gbit CJR" (2x16GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Sound 1: Zombee Z500 / Sound 2: Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150 / Storage 1 & 2: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD / Storage 3: Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD / Storage 4: Western Digital Elements Desktop 2TB HDD / Storage 5: Kingston A2000 1TB M.2 NVME SSD / Wi-fi & Bluetooth: ASUS PCE-AC55BT Wireless Adapter (Intel)

Vishera-X8-9370 | R20 score MC: 1476cb

Spoiler

Case: Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Case Fan(s) Front: Noctua NF-A14 ULN 140mm Premium Fans / Case Fan(s) Rear: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (red) / Case Fan(s) Side: Noctua NF-A6x25 FLX 60mm Premium Fan / Case Fan VRM: SUNON MagLev KDE1209PTV3 92mm / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / CPU: AMD FX-8370 (Base: @4.4GHz | Turbo: @4.7GHz) Black Edition Eight-Core (Global Foundries 32nm) / Display: ASUS 24" LED VN247H (67Hz OC) 1920x1080p / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC @1501MHz (Samsung 14nm FinFET) / Keyboard: Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING, Socket-AM3+ / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W PSU / RAM 1, 2, 3 & 4: Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866MHz CL8-10-10-28-37-2T (4x4GB) 16.38GB / Operating System 1: Windows 10 Home / Sound: Zombee Z300 / Storage 1: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (x2) / Storage 2: Seagate® Barracuda 2TB HDD / Storage 3: Seagate® Desktop 2TB SSHD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN951N 11n Wireless Adapter

Godavari-X4-880K | R20 score MC: 810cb

Spoiler

Case: Medion Micro-ATX Case / Case Fan Front: SUNON MagLev PF70251VX-Q000-S99 70mm / Case Fan Rear: Fanner Tech(Shen Zhen)Co.,LTD. 80mm (Purple) / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 95w Thermal Solution / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 125w Thermal Solution / CPU: AMD Athlon X4 860K Black Edition Elite Quad-Core (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / CPU: AMD Athlon X4 880K Black Edition Elite Quad-Core (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / Display: HP 19" Flat Panel L1940 (75Hz) 1280x1024 / GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 960 SuperSC 2GB (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / Keyboard: HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic) / Motherboard: MSI A78M-E45 V2, Socket-FM2+ / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W PSU / RAM 1, 2, 3 & 4: SK hynix DDR3-1866MHz CL9-10-11-27-40 (4x4GB) 16.38GB / Operating System 1: Ubuntu Gnome 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) / Operating System 2: Windows 10 Home / Sound 1: Zombee Z500 / Sound 2: Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150 / Storage 1: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (x2) / Storage 2: Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD / Storage 3: Western Digital Elements Desktop 2TB HDD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN851N 11n Wireless Adapter

Acer Aspire 7738G custom (changed CPU, GPU & Storage)
Spoiler

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 2-cores, 2-threads, 2.4GHz, 3MB cache (Intel 45nm) / GPU: ATi Radeon HD 4570 515MB DDR2 (T.S.M.C. 55nm) / RAM: DDR2-1066MHz CL7-7-7-20-1T (2x2GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Storage: Crucial BX500 480GB 3D NAND SATA 2.5" SSD

Complete portable device SoC history:

Spoiler
Apple A4 - Apple iPod touch (4th generation)
Apple A5 - Apple iPod touch (5th generation)
Apple A9 - Apple iPhone 6s Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 810 (T.S.M.C. 7nm) - Huawei P40 Lite / Huawei nova 7i
Mediatek MT2601 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - TicWatch E
Mediatek MT6580 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - TECNO Spark 2 (1GB RAM)
Mediatek MT6592M (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone my32 (orange)
Mediatek MT6592M (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone my32 (yellow)
Mediatek MT6735 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - HMD Nokia 3 Dual SIM
Mediatek MT6737 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - Cherry Mobile Flare S6
Mediatek MT6739 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone myX8 (blue)
Mediatek MT6739 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone myX8 (gold)
Mediatek MT6750 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - honor 6C Pro / honor V9 Play
Mediatek MT6765 (T.S.M.C 12nm) - TECNO Pouvoir 3 Plus
Mediatek MT6797D (T.S.M.C 20nm) - my|phone Brown Tab 1
Qualcomm MSM8926 (T.S.M.C. 28nm) - Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE
Qualcomm MSM8974AA (T.S.M.C. 28nm) - Blackberry Passport
Qualcomm SDM710 (Samsung 10nm) - Oppo Realme 3 Pro

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be wrong (Correct me please), but it's possible that the pci-e slots on motherboards that old could be version 1.0, leading to highly degraded GPU performance.

 

I will say this: I had a c2q machine with a q9400 with a gtx 750 ti, and I upgraded to a new system with an i3-6100 and the same gpu, but my gaming performance skyrocketed. (Not to mention day to day performance).

Desktop Build:

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | MSI b350m Mortar Arctic | 16GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury | Fractal Design Define Mini C TG | 240GB Sandisk SSD Plus

 

Home Server Build:

Intel Core i3-6100 | ASRock Pro 4s | 16GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury | Corsair 500r

 

"Just because you're garbage doesn't mean you can't do great things. It's called garbage can, not garbage cannot."
-Oscar the Grouch

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iraxis said:

I could be wrong (Correct me please), but it's possible that the pci-e slots on motherboards that old could be version 1.0, leading to highly degraded GPU performance.

 

I will say this: I had a c2q machine with a q9400 with a gtx 750 ti, and I upgraded to a new system with an i3-6100 and the same gpu, but my gaming performance skyrocketed. (Not to mention day to day performance).

Nope, very few games show any tangible benefit when going from pcie Gen 1.1 x16 to Gen 3.0 x16. And the gaming performance boost with the i3 6100 is because it is better in every single way than any C2Q. Also, Q9400 if you don't overclock only run at 2.66GHz, which is why I always recommend overclocking any C2Q to at least 3GHz, or outright buying one with a 3GHz clock speed.

"We also blind small animals with cosmetics.
We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals."

 

"Please don't mistake us for Equifax. Those fuckers are evil"

 

This PSA brought to you by Equifacks.
PMSL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Q9450 @ 3ghz that I'm typing this on now. With a modern video card people would be very surprised. It will hold back the top end cards on minimum framerates with the most intensive games. And if you're sitting on a boatload of money like I am, you should upgrade to Skylake (I just don't replace many things as long as they're doing what I need and aren't broken). But a Geforce 960 would be a great match. A CPU like this one is roughly equivalent to AMD's A10 APUs in CPU performance.

A 750Ti, 950 or 960 to an old C2Q I think it would be fine. I wouldn't spend any more than what those cost on an old system but will definitely breathe new life into it with the video codec offloading and other desktop acceleration.

 

If you're doing competitive gaming, my friends and I drop the resolution on those games anyway such as CSGo to 1280x1024. Regardless if we run a GF960 or 980Ti. For League of Legends it doesn't matter what you use. For mainstream AAA titles that are mostly about graphics, I don't care if there's less than ideal performance since I don't play those competitively.

1 hour ago, Iraxis said:

I could be wrong (Correct me please), but it's possible that the pci-e slots on motherboards that old could be version 1.0, leading to highly degraded GPU performance.

 

I will say this: I had a c2q machine with a q9400 with a gtx 750 ti, and I upgraded to a new system with an i3-6100 and the same gpu, but my gaming performance skyrocketed. (Not to mention day to day performance).

This old system has a PCIE 2.0 x16 slot that I use. It's 8GB/sec (bidirectional so 16GB/sec) which is pretty good. If you want proof-

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/pci_express_scaling_game_performance_analysis_review,7.html
PCIE 1.0 x16 fast enough to power a 980. Which is exactly half of PCIE 2.0 x16.

So you could have stopped worrying about PCIE bandwidth back in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So about a month ago I made a video on how GTA V ran on the Q6600 (overclocked @ 3.0Ghz) and a stock 650ti so here is that video;

 

 

Not sure if I am aloud to post this but thought it might give a good idea on what to expect performance wise from a chip like the Q6600. Please feel free to remove this post if it does not fall under the rules. 

A shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man who does not exist.

 

Core 4 Quad Not Extreme, only available on LGA 557 at your local Circuit City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, yenic said:

I have a Q9450 @ 3ghz that I'm typing this on now. With a modern video card people would be very surprised. It will hold back the top end cards on minimum framerates with the most intensive games. And if you're sitting on a boatload of money like I am, you should upgrade to Skylake (I just don't replace many things as long as they're doing what I need and aren't broken). But a Geforce 960 would be a great match. A CPU like this one is roughly equivalent to AMD's A10 APUs in CPU performance.

A 750Ti, 950 or 960 to an old C2Q I think it would be fine. I wouldn't spend any more than what those cost on an old system but will definitely breathe new life into it with the video codec offloading and other desktop acceleration.

 

If you're doing competitive gaming, my friends and I drop the resolution on those games anyway such as CSGo to 1280x1024. Regardless if we run a GF960 or 980Ti. For League of Legends it doesn't matter what you use. For mainstream AAA titles that are mostly about graphics, I don't care if there's less than ideal performance since I don't play those competitively.

This old system has a PCIE 2.0 x16 slot that I use. It's 8GB/sec (bidirectional so 16GB/sec) which is pretty good. If you want proof-

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/pci_express_scaling_game_performance_analysis_review,7.html
PCIE 1.0 x16 fast enough to power a 980. Which is exactly half of PCIE 2.0 x16.

So you could have stopped worrying about PCIE bandwidth back in 2003.

 

Okay cool, wasn't sure. Thanks!

Desktop Build:

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | MSI b350m Mortar Arctic | 16GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury | Fractal Design Define Mini C TG | 240GB Sandisk SSD Plus

 

Home Server Build:

Intel Core i3-6100 | ASRock Pro 4s | 16GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury | Corsair 500r

 

"Just because you're garbage doesn't mean you can't do great things. It's called garbage can, not garbage cannot."
-Oscar the Grouch

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×