Jump to content

USB 3.0 port with a 3.2 front panel header

Hi all,

 

Just got the P400a and noticed on the spec sheet it has 3.0 front USB ports but my B550m motherboard has a USB 3.2 front panel connector which im going to connect the ports to. Will these 3.0 ports now run at 3.2 gen 1 speeds or is there a hardware limitation on the port itself?

 

Thankful for any help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe? Labeling for USB is truly, unfathomably bad right now.

 

The limits for USB 3.2 gen 1 are in the USB controller and the USB device, not in the port. If the headers are actually USB 3.2 gen 1 then yes it will run at 3.2 gen 1 speeds. The problem is that manufacturers don't seem to be keen to say exactly what each port/header really is, and some (cough Gigabyte cough) have a bunch of stuff out there that directly contradicts itself.

 

image.png.46a1b4896e9db302061c36adee13e7c4.png

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

 

Desktop:

Intel Core i7-11700K | Noctua NH-D15S chromax.black | ASUS ROG Strix Z590-E Gaming WiFi  | 32 GB G.SKILL TridentZ 3200 MHz | ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3080 | 1TB Samsung 980 Pro M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD | 2TB WD Blue M.2 SATA SSD | Seasonic Focus GX-850 Fractal Design Meshify C Windows 10 Pro

 

Laptop:

HP Omen 15 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 16 GB 3200 MHz | Nvidia RTX 3060 | 1 TB WD Black PCIe 3.0 SSD | 512 GB Micron PCIe 3.0 SSD | Windows 11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually, Front USB 3.2 Gen 2 connector at the motherboard is referring to USB-C connector. USB 3.0 type A port uses USB 3.0 header (20 pin, 2 row 10 column, with  no pin at pin 20).

I have ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum

 

I apologies if my comments or post offends you in any way, or if my rage got a little too far. I'll try my best to make my post as non-offensive as much as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/6/2020 at 1:10 AM, BobVonBob said:

Maybe? Labeling for USB is truly, unfathomably bad right now.

 

The limits for USB 3.2 gen 1 are in the USB controller and the USB device, not in the port. If the headers are actually USB 3.2 gen 1 then yes it will run at 3.2 gen 1 speeds. The problem is that manufacturers don't seem to be keen to say exactly what each port/header really is, and some (cough Gigabyte cough) have a bunch of stuff out there that directly contradicts itself.

 

image.png.46a1b4896e9db302061c36adee13e7c4.png

It turns out it works but I think due to that's it's powering 2 ports off one header it's a bit choked for power. I have issues running external hard drives off it and still just rely on the back ports. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×