Jump to content

A quite non-scientific and often happened myth, maybe topic for an LTT episode?

acidrain_3

I heard that data transferring is much secured and lossless to use port in the back of the motherboard, in stead of the front I/O.

 

Especially when it comes to OS installing. The system stability is inferior if using the front ports?

 

Sounds crazy, right, but friends and people I met in the chatting group both shown the same issue.

 

Symptoms would be software crashes, blue screen, unpredictable shutdown. But mostly the middle one.

 

Maybe sound stupid and bullcrap that I've never encounter that, because I've never use fronts. Also maybe the LTSC version I use?

 

I literally just typed this question after my friend an I play Monster Hunter, and he crashes with the sudden death of blue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's probably less reliable. Adding more parts like a usb cable and the extra length can allow for more interference. The front i/o build quality is also often not as good. 

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see this.

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600x  | GPU: GTX 1070 FE | RAM: TridentZ 16GB 3200MHz | Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 Aorus M | PSU: EVGA 650 B3 | STORAGE: Boot drive: Crucial MX500 1TB, Secondary drive: WD Blue 1TB hdd | CASE: Phanteks P350x | OS: Windows 10 | Monitor: Main: ASUS VP249QGR 144Hz, Secondary: Dell E2014h 1600x900

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TrainFan2019 said:

I would like to see this.

A boring, result over process kind of video. But I trust Linus can make it entertaining though, literally a media group, where actors(employees) are trained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, acidrain_3 said:

I heard that data transferring is much secured and lossless to use port in the back of the motherboard, in stead of the front I/O.

 

Especially when it comes to OS installing. The system stability is inferior if using the front ports?

No, unless your front IO has trash cabling. 

I use my front ports all the time. 

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would have to be looked up, but this raises the question if USB data transfers include at the least error checking. For the symptoms described there would have to be silent data corruption happening on the transfers. It can't be corruption on the storage itself as that would impact regardless if it was plugged in front or rear ports.

 

An easy test might be to simply copy a large file to/from a USB stick a few times and verify its checksum.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is error detection of course, you won't get data corruption but if the signal is bad you'll just have transfers hanging or the drive disconnecting.

 

I've had that happen, since using a front port increases the cable length and said cable goes through places with high interference it has to have a good quality cabling. Some unfortunately don't.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×