Oshino Shinobu

KB5029351 is a CU preview, so the latest Windows Creation Tool ISO/download shouldn't include it as it's not in GA yet. Also, Windows Creation Tools will download the latest ISO version available rather than a specific version, so using an old version wouldn't do anything.
 
Just don't install it. Preview updates shouldn't install automatically. If it does, just uninstall the update after.

Posting just to have the first build in this thread.
 
Specs:
Ryzen 5900X
Noctua NH-D15
Asus ProArt Creator B550
32GB Klevv Bolt X
XFX SWFT 6900XT
Corsair HX850
Lian-Li O11 Air Mini
Mellanox Connect-X3 (40GbE)
1TB Sabrent Rocket Q + 2TB WD Blue NMVe Drives + 60TB NAS
 
 

 

Posting just to have the first build in this thread.
 
Specs:
Ryzen 5900X
Noctua NH-D15
Asus ProArt Creator B550
32GB Klevv Bolt X
XFX SWFT 6900XT
Corsair HX850
Lian-Li O11 Air Mini
Mellanox Connect-X3 (40GbE)
1TB Sabrent Rocket Q + 2TB WD Blue NMVe Drives + 60TB NAS
 
 

 

Refurbished ones almost certainly will be decommed ones. Will just be a seller that gets them in bulk from business and then resells them.

Download Autoruns from Sysinternals (Microsoft) https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/autoruns
 
Unzip it and run it, then click on the logon tab and delete any entries with File not found errors.
 
For example, I have a few in my startup that are the same as yours:


In Autoruns:

 
Delete it and it's fone. Ignore that blank program, that's something else.
 


EDIT: You can also just untick them in Autoruns. That blank program for me is TeamsMachineInstaller. You can just untick them one at a time and see what it removes from the StartUp menu

With it:

 
Without:

2280 is just the dimensions. 22mm wide and 80mm long. the enclosure doesn't support that drive as it uses the NVMe protocol but the enclosure only supports SATA.

No, the enclosure only supports SATA drives. You need one that supports NVMe.

2280 is just the dimensions. 22mm wide and 80mm long. the enclosure doesn't support that drive as it uses the NVMe protocol but the enclosure only supports SATA.

No, the enclosure only supports SATA drives. You need one that supports NVMe.

No, the enclosure only supports SATA drives. You need one that supports NVMe.

No, the enclosure only supports SATA drives. You need one that supports NVMe.

Yeah the pry tools are useful, even for non-tech things. I used one of the little triangle spudgers to tuck in some weather stripping on my car recently.

I have the Pro Tech toolkit, have had it for like 6-7 years, well worth the money, I use it all the time. If you're just looking for the screwdriver and bits kit, they're really good quality, I've considered buying a smaller kit to keep in my car or something

I have the Pro Tech toolkit, have had it for like 6-7 years, well worth the money, I use it all the time. If you're just looking for the screwdriver and bits kit, they're really good quality, I've considered buying a smaller kit to keep in my car or something

I have the Pro Tech toolkit, have had it for like 6-7 years, well worth the money, I use it all the time. If you're just looking for the screwdriver and bits kit, they're really good quality, I've considered buying a smaller kit to keep in my car or something

SFC will often find things that need repairing, but doesn't necassarily mean the BSOD causing issue is fixed. Only way to tell is keep using the system and see if it happens again.

Sublime text for taking notes?, using onenote is not bad but sometimes I find it a bit clunky maybe try using this software called keepnote.

Not 100% sure on X99's compatibility with LRDIMM. It supports RDIMM, but LRDIMM may not work.
 
As for PCPP, it's typicaly pretty bad with memory compatibility on older boards, especially with Xeons. Both the board and CPU should suport 32GB DIMMs.

Depends really. If you're running using a secure Hypervisor like Hyper-V or VMWare (that's fully up to date) and don't have it connected to the network (or isolated on a completed seperate network), it's generally safe, though you do need to know how to set them up properly in order to keep them isolated.
 
It's generally security researchers that use them for running viruses, so they can research what they do and how to stop them. Not much reason to do it yourself. As you've got to get the virus on there in the first place, there's always a risk.

Depends really. If you're running using a secure Hypervisor like Hyper-V or VMWare (that's fully up to date) and don't have it connected to the network (or isolated on a completed seperate network), it's generally safe, though you do need to know how to set them up properly in order to keep them isolated.
 
It's generally security researchers that use them for running viruses, so they can research what they do and how to stop them. Not much reason to do it yourself. As you've got to get the virus on there in the first place, there's always a risk.

Depends really. If you're running using a secure Hypervisor like Hyper-V or VMWare (that's fully up to date) and don't have it connected to the network (or isolated on a completed seperate network), it's generally safe, though you do need to know how to set them up properly in order to keep them isolated.
 
It's generally security researchers that use them for running viruses, so they can research what they do and how to stop them. Not much reason to do it yourself. As you've got to get the virus on there in the first place, there's always a risk.

Depends really. If you're running using a secure Hypervisor like Hyper-V or VMWare (that's fully up to date) and don't have it connected to the network (or isolated on a completed seperate network), it's generally safe, though you do need to know how to set them up properly in order to keep them isolated.
 
It's generally security researchers that use them for running viruses, so they can research what they do and how to stop them. Not much reason to do it yourself. As you've got to get the virus on there in the first place, there's always a risk.

Either my eyes are terrible or people are generally full of it. 24" is perfectly fine at 1080p. 4K at 28" was near unusable without scaling, if we're talking about using it as a PC monitor.
 
Then again, people claim they can really tell the difference between small res bumps on phones, so I'm going with the people are full of it theory, or at least are affected by a placebo because they know it's higher res.

Either my eyes are terrible or people are generally full of it. 24" is perfectly fine at 1080p. 4K at 28" was near unusable without scaling, if we're talking about using it as a PC monitor.
 
Then again, people claim they can really tell the difference between small res bumps on phones, so I'm going with the people are full of it theory, or at least are affected by a placebo because they know it's higher res.

Either my eyes are terrible or people are generally full of it. 24" is perfectly fine at 1080p. 4K at 28" was near unusable without scaling, if we're talking about using it as a PC monitor.
 
Then again, people claim they can really tell the difference between small res bumps on phones, so I'm going with the people are full of it theory, or at least are affected by a placebo because they know it's higher res.