nick5530

The Samsung 850 EVO 1TB is $100 off at Newegg for a price of $249.99. It also comes with a copy of Watch Dogs 2.
 
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147374&ignorebbr=1

The Samsung 850 EVO 1TB is $100 off at Newegg for a price of $249.99. It also comes with a copy of Watch Dogs 2.
 
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147374&ignorebbr=1

Sorry, I didn't click on the link before I responded.

At some point some company needed to drop type-A usb to force everyone to start using Type-C. No matter what there was going to be a shitty transitional period. I'd rather get it over with and be on type-c. 
 
The only real downside to the connectivity is a lack of an sd card slot. 

I need an H110 motherboard. The one I was going to get Asus H110M-A went out of stock. 
This is my build:
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
CPU: Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor  (Purchased For $204.99) 
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler  ($29.99 @ Newegg) 
Memory: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory  (Purchased For $30.00) 
Storage: A-Data Premier SP550 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive  (Purchased For $61.47) 
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (Purchased For $49.99) 
Video Card: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB G1 Gaming Video Card  (Purchased For $296.98) 
Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro M ATX Mid Tower Case  (Purchased For $69.99) 
Power Supply: EVGA 650W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply  (Purchased For $69.99) 
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 10 Home Full - USB 32/64-bit  (Purchased For $119.99) 
Case Fan: Fractal Design SSR3-140-WT 56.1 CFM  140mm Fan  (Purchased For $10.98) 
Other: NETGEAR AC1200 WiFi USB 2.0 Adapter - AC Dual Band  (Purchased For $14.83)
Other: Rosewill ESD Anti-Static Wrist Strap Components RTK-002, Black/Yellow (Purchased For $5.40)
Total: $964.60
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-10-20 19:46 EDT-0400
 
Thanks in advance!

Fire, exploding hardware

I had just got two components and was looking at them. I had set the RAM down to look at the manual of the other component.

Well there is always going to be another big thing just around the corner when you are buying electronics. I would say go ahead and buy it.

Shit. Insurance is void too. Act of dog.
 
He may be small, but you should still take him out of his packaging.

Yeah. Probably would have been smart just didn't think of it.  

I was thinking about future proofing and it was cheaper than most H170 motherboards, so that was my thinking.

Product Name: Sennheiser HD 598 Special Edition Over-Ear Headphones - Black
Discounted Price: $109.99 (USD)
Regular Retail Price: $144.99 (USD)
Link: https://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-HD-598-Over-Ear-Headphones/dp/B0126HISOO/ref=sr_1_1?s=prime-day-secondary&psr=PD16&ie=UTF8&qid=1468356741&sr=8-1&keywords=sennheiser

Uhm.....yeah.

I imagine you doing what your profile pic is as you are working on it.

I agree. I love the huge screen

Nexus 6

I think he is okay as we as been sick before, however I'm still worried about him.

#UnsweetIcedTea

Time is reporting that, in contrast to the many rumors (and GTAT investor claims), Apple had never planned to use sapphire displays for the iPhone 6, and the company may not use it for future iPhones.
 
The first is that the strength of sapphire has been largely misunderstood. Yes, it’s very resistant to scratches, but it’s actually more vulnerable than Gorilla Glass to being smashed when dropped – and even the invisible scratches a phone can get when carried in pockets can lead to failure.  
Sapphire is also denser than glass, making it heavier, and bulkier – neither good things when your aim is to make a phone as thin and light as possible.
Battery life, surprisingly, was also a key consideration. Sapphire transmits less light than glass, requiring more powerful backlighting to deliver the same display brightness. The all-in cost of using a sapphire display is also much higher than some had estimated. The material cost is around ten times that of Gorilla Glass, and it’s claimed associated costs could add as much as $100 to the cost of an iPhone. Finally, for a company which prides itself on its environmental credentials, Apple may have felt some discomfort over the amount of energy required to manufacture sapphire: more than 100 times that of the same quantity of glass Most of these arguments would also apply to the use of sapphire in the Apple Watch, but the much smaller surface area means that cost is less of a factor – and scratch-resistance is more important than protection against drops in a device that spends most of the day securely attached to your wrist.
 
I was pretty excited for the Sapphire Display, but I guess these reasons are enough to justify why they didn't do it.
 
Source: http://9to5mac.com/2014/09/17/the-five-reasons-apple-never-intended-to-use-sapphire-displays-on-the-iphone-6-time/