Incredibly strange performance (3 GPUs)

[King of the West]

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BAQiUgvJO0zPSGxbxDpohwLb1BzzjIbYo36hB3iRI04/edit?usp=drivesdk

 

So I felt like testing my GPUs today; a GTX 1060 3GB, an RX 480 4GB and an R7 260X. The only GPU I can actually use is the RX 480 because it has 2 HDMI ports.

 

Nevertheless I tested them all very hurriedly in csgo, dust II, rushing long a as a terrorist with easy bots at 1440x1080 each time. Every time I used ddu to uninstall the previous drivers. I used Fraps and Frafs to get the AVG, 1% lows and 0.1% lows. I did 4 rounds (except the 1060 - only 3) to get an AVG of all the dependent variables.

 

What I don't understand is that the cheapest and oldest GPU performs the best. Why? I did the tests over the course of little over an hour but I tried to remain precise and accurate. I don't have access to my pc now but I will test more tomorrow. Interestingly, the r7 260x performed the worst in heaven benchmark (under 10fps) so maybe it was just csgo.

[Br3tt96]

I'd check again and make sure it was the right resolution

[King of the West]

23 minutes ago, Br3tt96 said:

I'd check again and make sure it was the right resolution

I'm certain I'm using the right resolution since I'm using 4:3 on my 21:9 monitor which is incredibly stretched. On top of this, in my experience the difference in FPS between  the 4:3 resolutions is very low since csgo offers such a minimal range to choose from. 

[Froody129]

CSGO really doesn't need much GPU power, try a different game and you'll get the real performance