Jump to content

BQ Dark Rock 4 or Dark Rock Pro 4 for 6600k Overclocking

Go to solution Solved by Princess Luna,

By all means you are way much better off saving for a second hand i7 7700k, it at stock will already outperform the i5 6600k at 4.8ghz to begin with.

Im at the point where in all the rendering and some of my gaming workloads I am mostly bottlenecked by my CPU (I5-6600k) with it reaching 100% usage in a lot of the programs I use, even with a 4.4GHz overclock. Im thinking about overclocking it more, but if I push more than 1.27v through the CPU core my Cooler Master Hyper 212 evo can't keep the temps under control. I have a few questions, the first one is how beffy of a cooler do I need to reach 4.8GHz. I have settled on Be Quiet! coolers because I also don't want it to sound like a jet engine, so should I get the Dark Rock 4 or the Dark Rock Pro 4? Second, is the extra 400MHz increase in clock speed over what I can already achieve worth $75-90 on a cooler, or am I better off saving some money and getting a used I7-7700k?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means you are way much better off saving for a second hand i7 7700k, it at stock will already outperform the i5 6600k at 4.8ghz to begin with.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What programs are you using? Depending on your render settings, 100% cpu usage is to be expected and isn't a bad thing.

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

May be simplistic - why not both?

 

The cooler is a much less expensive component of the system, so save up for a 7700k (new or used, its not that expensive new now any more? $440 AUD whatever that's worth to you), and a DRP4 cooler then install both.

 

I just installed a DRP3 cooler on a system with an 8700k and it's running fine, we're still yet to turn up the overclock but a simply 1.25V 4.7GHz is hardly stressing the cooler at this stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WoodenMarker said:

What programs are you using? Depending on your render settings, 100% cpu usage is to be expected and isn't a bad thing.

You are correct, things like blender are supposed to be at 100%. My problem is I play a lot of games that are in-development and or not graphically intensive, those are the main programs that shouldn't be running at 100%. Other things like rendering in Vegas is also heavily dependent on CPU strength. I didn't know that the benchmark scores between the 6600k and 7700k are that different, so I guess I will start saving my money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MineParker101 said:

My problem is I play a lot of games that are in-development and or not graphically intensive, those are the main programs that shouldn't be running at 100%

Are you experiencing low performance in these games? 

If the games aren't well optimized, raising the oc or getting a cpu that isn't significantly better isn't going to lower the cpu usage.

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WoodenMarker said:

Are you experiencing low performance in these games? 

If the games aren't well optimized, raising the oc or getting a cpu that isn't significantly better isn't going to lower the cpu usage.

Yes, I get a lot of lag spikes in some of those games, and It seems like the games are taking full advantage of my cpu, puching it to 100% usage. It seems like the CPU is the bottleneck because the GPU is barley being utilized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, MineParker101 said:

Yes, I get a lot of lag spikes in some of those games, and It seems like the games are taking full advantage of my cpu, puching it to 100% usage. It seems like the CPU is the bottleneck because the GPU is barley being utilized. 

Are the games performing similarly for others with similar specs? Are there any settings you can lower?

Low gpu utilization seems normal for games that aren't graphically intensive.

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WoodenMarker said:

Are the games performing similarly for others with similar specs? Are there any settings you can lower?

Low gpu utilization seems normal for games that aren't graphically intensive.

Yes they are, but they are open world games so it heavily depends on how many objects you spawn in them. Beamng Drive for example, with push the CPU to 100 if I spawn enough cars into the game. The only settings that I can mess around with are the graphics settings, but the games that im having trouble with barly use my GPU (1060 6gb), making lowing graphics settings usless. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MineParker101 said:

Yes they are, but they are open world games so it heavily depends on how many objects you spawn in them. Beamng Drive for example, with push the CPU to 100 if I spawn enough cars into the game. The only settings that I can mess around with are the graphics settings, but the games that im having trouble with barly use my GPU (1060 6gb), making lowing graphics settings usless. 

I'm not sure which games you're having issues with but upgrading to a 7700k should help if you know that others using the same cpu aren't having these issues.

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, WoodenMarker said:

I'm not sure which games you're having issues with but upgrading to a 7700k should help if you know that others using the same cpu aren't having these issues.

Yea, I think i'm just going to go with that, a lot of my rendering workloads and even some games are surprisingly multi threaded and will equalize the load across all cores, which leads me to believe that not only will the extra single core performance benefit me, the extra threads will also be beneficial. I didn't know how much of a performance gains I would get from ether upgrade, but now I know. Thanks to all who contributed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×