Jump to content

I'm trying to figure out how this works and why there's such a difference. My setup has my main rig on ethernet and my laptop is on wifi. Using a program called Dukto on both computers, I'm transferring ~22gb of jpegs to my laptop. When my laptop is near the router I'm getting ~150mbps transfer speed and upstairs it drops to ~120mbps. If I run an internet speed test at the same time I get a total of ~170mbps with speedtest.net showing ~70mbps (internet speed) meaning the file transfer speed must have dropped. BUT, if it's able to reach ~170mbps during the internet speed test, why can't just transferring files reach that too? SSD/HDD is not bottlenecking. I figured it must just be the fact that it's a lot of jpegs, buuuuut I also have a program on both computers called synthing that syncs picture folders and when I run that program, I've seen it transfer png/jpg files over the network at ~350mbps. What gives?

 

CPU - FX 8350 @ 4.5GHZ GPU - Radeon 5700  Mobo - M5A99FX Pro R2.0 RAM - Crucial Ballistix 16GB @ 1600 PSU - Corsair CX600M CPU Cooler - Hyper 212 EVO Storage - Samsung EVO 250GB, WD Blue 1TB

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/909316-file-transfers-over-network/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WereCatf said:

It could just as well simply be Dukto itself which is inefficient.

Anything you'd recommend instead of dukto?

 

CPU - FX 8350 @ 4.5GHZ GPU - Radeon 5700  Mobo - M5A99FX Pro R2.0 RAM - Crucial Ballistix 16GB @ 1600 PSU - Corsair CX600M CPU Cooler - Hyper 212 EVO Storage - Samsung EVO 250GB, WD Blue 1TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DarkEnergy said:

Anything you'd recommend instead of dukto?

Sorry, I don't use anything such as you do and as such I don't know any applicable apps. I have a NAS and a USB SSD for copying files around with, myself.

Hand, n. A singular instrument worn at the end of the human arm and commonly thrust into somebody’s pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

Why not just use the smb sharing built into windows.

If you mean folder sharing and whatnot, it's a steaming pile of crap that windows tries to make more complicated. I've had issues with it in the past.

 

CPU - FX 8350 @ 4.5GHZ GPU - Radeon 5700  Mobo - M5A99FX Pro R2.0 RAM - Crucial Ballistix 16GB @ 1600 PSU - Corsair CX600M CPU Cooler - Hyper 212 EVO Storage - Samsung EVO 250GB, WD Blue 1TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DarkEnergy said:

If you mean folder sharing and whatnot, it's a steaming pile of crap that windows tries to make more complicated. I've had issues with it in the past.

I wouldn't call it a pile of crap. Its well supported, fast and on basically every system out there. And its pretty darn stable too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×