Jump to content

Formula for comparison of RAM

Hi, all...

 

So, I am down to the Memory choice for my build. I have looked and looked at 2x8GB dual channel sets, and have come up with a formula (of sorts... I'm no mathematician) that is helping me choose RAM. What do you think about it as a comparison tool?  

 

Value = CAS / Speed x Price (where CAS is the first timing, Speed is in gHz and price is current available in USD)

 

For example...

 

DDR4-2133 at 15CAS for $153   gives a Value of 1075.95 (15/2.133 x 153)

DDR4-2400 at 15CAS for $164   gives a Value of 1025 (15/2.4 x 164)

DDR4-2666 at 15CAS for $170   gives a Value of 956.49 (15/2.666 x 170)

DDR4-3000 at 15CAS for $198   gives a Value of 990 (15/3 x 198)

 

DDR4-2133 at 14CAS for $175   gives a Value of 1148.62 (14/2.133 x 175)

DDR4-2400 at 14CAS for $145   gives a Value of 845.83 (14/2.4 x 145)

DDR4-3000 at 14CAS for $240   gives a Value of 1120 (14/3 x 240)

 

DDR4-2400 at 10CAS for $230   gives a Value of 958.33 (10/2.4 x 230) This is the Corsair Dominator Platinum

DDR4-3200 at 14CAS for $189   gives a Value of 826.88 (14/3.2 x 189) This is the Team Dark Pro which was my choice, but they are sold out at that price (another You Snooze You Lose moment for me). 

 

This formula doesn't take into account the full timing, of course (15-19-19-36 is WAY different than 15-15-15-30, for example).  It also doesn't really take the performance increase into account (It would be a difficult decision to choose between a 2666/15 for $170 and a 2400/10 for $230 because the price versus performance, even though the Values are only 1.84 apart). 

 

I'm sure there are a ridiculous amount of errors in both my math and my thinking, and I'd love to have y'all point them out and get me thinking better about my coming decision. Be kind... I'm a Newb. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that's over-complicating things somewhat. Just pick something fast-ish in budget and looks nice. Done.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, porina said:

I think that's over-complicating things somewhat. Just pick something fast-ish in budget and looks nice. Done.

GSkill Trident Z is always the answer, Samsung Modules and Dies, good built quality, most pretty looking... total win win do not regret mine one bit... did not take the RGB one though as it was overpriced lets be honest but after I found the static White one damn it looks awesome :3

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AnandTech has a rough formula for working out ram performance, which is Speed/Cas in mHz. Eg 2400mHz at CAS 15 = 160. However really just aim for what you can afford within your build, minimum should be 2400 mhz at any timings unless its a really budget build. After that aim for 3000 or 3200. Remember any overclocking mobos will allow for overclocking ram also so you can somewhat help middling ram timings later with an overclock at higher ram voltage. 

CPU: Intel i9 9900K Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z390-F RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX @ 3000MHz CL15 GPU: Gigabyte 1080Ti Windforce w/ AIO Liquid cooler Case: Fractal Design Define S Storage: 500GB Samsung 970 Evo NVME, 1TB OCZ Trion 150, 1TB SanDisk Ultra II, 2TB Samsung 860 QVO PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2 Gold 850W Display: 1440p 144Hz Acer XG270HU CPU Cooling: Noctua NH-D15 Keyboard: Logitech G Pro TKL Mouse: Logitech G403 Wireless Sound: Fiio E10k + Sennheiser HD6xx + Logitech Desktop Tower Speakers OS: Windows 10 Home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chuck Comet said:

Hi, all...

 

So, I am down to the Memory choice for my build. I have looked and looked at 2x8GB dual channel sets, and have come up with a formula (of sorts... I'm no mathematician) that is helping me choose RAM. What do you think about it as a comparison tool?  

 

Value = CAS / Speed x Price (where CAS is the first timing, Speed is in gHz and price is current available in USD)

 

For example...

 

DDR4-2133 at 15CAS for $153   gives a Value of 1075.95 (15/2.133 x 153)

DDR4-2400 at 15CAS for $164   gives a Value of 1025 (15/2.4 x 164)

DDR4-2666 at 15CAS for $170   gives a Value of 956.49 (15/2.666 x 170)

DDR4-3000 at 15CAS for $198   gives a Value of 990 (15/3 x 198)

 

DDR4-2133 at 14CAS for $175   gives a Value of 1148.62 (14/2.133 x 175)

DDR4-2400 at 14CAS for $145   gives a Value of 845.83 (14/2.4 x 145)

DDR4-3000 at 14CAS for $240   gives a Value of 1120 (14/3 x 240)

 

DDR4-2400 at 10CAS for $230   gives a Value of 958.33 (10/2.4 x 230) This is the Corsair Dominator Platinum

DDR4-3200 at 14CAS for $189   gives a Value of 826.88 (14/3.2 x 189) This is the Team Dark Pro which was my choice, but they are sold out at that price (another You Snooze You Lose moment for me). 

 

This formula doesn't take into account the full timing, of course (15-19-19-36 is WAY different than 15-15-15-30, for example).  It also doesn't really take the performance increase into account (It would be a difficult decision to choose between a 2666/15 for $170 and a 2400/10 for $230 because the price versus performance, even though the Values are only 1.84 apart). 

 

I'm sure there are a ridiculous amount of errors in both my math and my thinking, and I'd love to have y'all point them out and get me thinking better about my coming decision. Be kind... I'm a Newb. :-)

This formula simply doesn't work because clocks and primary timings tell you very little about actual real world performance. High frequencies and tight primaries mean nothing if tertiary timings are loose enough to the point in which you are losing bandwidth efficiency. Spend less time comparing the clocks and timings, and more time comparing the individual IC's within the kits. If you need resources for finding which IC's are in which kit, there have been strides to find the various IC's each kit has after Ryzen launched. Refer to the page below for information as to which kits have which IC's, and from there, cross reference those IC's against HWbot's memory OCing database to determine which are the best for performance. Right now, Samsung B-Die is king for both AMD and Intel.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/649ay8/ram_collection_thread_please_post_your_ram/

 

A lot of your ram's performance depends entirely on your IMC and board as well. Simply comparing the stats you find on marketing pages for various DIMM's won't give you any real information as to how it's going to perform for your system. You and I can buy the exact same kit of memory at the exact same time from the exact same production line, and still end up with drastically different performance depending on how our IMC and motherboards train the tertiary timings. From the time I spent OCing memory, I can say this: You are better off buying memory that you like (both in terms of price and aesthetics) and overclock the kit manually, rather than relying on any XMP marketing data. You will not only save money, you will end up with a faster system by the end of it. 

1 minute ago, Schrodingers Kat said:

AnandTech has a rough formula for working out ram performance, which is Speed/Cas in mHz. Eg 2400mHz at CAS 15 = 160. However really just aim for what you can afford within your build, minimum should be 2400 mhz at any timings unless its a really budget build. After that aim for 3000 or 3200. Remember any overclocking mobos will allow for overclocking ram also so you can somewhat help middling ram timings later with an overclock at higher ram voltage. 

That formula still doesn't work in the grand scheme of things for the reasons I mentioned above in my post. Frequency / CAS only tells you of absolute potential, it does not tell you what you are actually capable of getting. Tertiary timings dictate bandwidth efficiency, and they are the timings that allow you to actually get close to reaching that potential. They are also entirely dependent on IC quality, board quality (trace topology), and IMC quality. 

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MageTank said:

This formula simply doesn't work because clocks and primary timings tell you very little about actual real world performance. High frequencies and tight primaries mean nothing if tertiary timings are loose enough to the point in which you are losing bandwidth efficiency. Spend less time comparing the clocks and timings, and more time comparing the individual IC's within the kits. If you need resources for finding which IC's are in which kit, there have been strides to find the various IC's each kit has after Ryzen launched. Refer to the page below for information as to which kits have which IC's, and from there, cross reference those IC's against HWbot's memory OCing database to determine which are the best for performance. Right now, Samsung B-Die is king for both AMD and Intel.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/649ay8/ram_collection_thread_please_post_your_ram/

 

A lot of your ram's performance depends entirely on your IMC and board as well. Simply comparing the stats you find on marketing pages for various DIMM's won't give you any real information as to how it's going to perform for your system. You and I can buy the exact same kit of memory at the exact same time from the exact same production line, and still end up with drastically different performance depending on how our IMC and motherboards train the tertiary timings. From the time I spent OCing memory, I can say this: You are better off buying memory that you like (both in terms of price and aesthetics) and overclock the kit manually, rather than relying on any XMP marketing data. You will not only save money, you will end up with a faster system by the end of it. 

That formula still doesn't work in the grand scheme of things for the reasons I mentioned above in my post. Frequency / CAS only tells you of absolute potential, it does not tell you what you are actually capable of getting. Tertiary timings dictate bandwidth efficiency, and they are the timings that allow you to actually get close to reaching that potential. They are also entirely dependent on IC quality, board quality (trace topology), and IMC quality. 

Dude... that's the single best thing that I have seen posted on this site. BS like, "Just pick something fast-ish in budget and looks nice. Done." does us all a disservice. Your response taught me something, and now I can take my personal research further (and again, my research doesn't hold a candle to most). Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Chuck Comet said:

Dude... that's the single best thing that I have seen posted on this site. BS like, "Just pick something fast-ish in budget and looks nice. Done." does us all a disservice. Your response taught me something, and now I can take my personal research further (and again, my research doesn't hold a candle to most). Thanks!

While not entirely complete, I do also have a memory overclocking guide in my sig if you'd like to read a novels worth of information on the subject. I am also working on a mobile SO-DIMM overclocking guide, once I receive my laptop and get a custom bios flashed on it. Good luck with your ram selection. 

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×