Beat my x58 overclock!

[Rallenhayestime]

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3693240
Can anybody benchmark their CPUs on userbenchmark and beat my CPU?

can be any CPU, not just x58

[themctipers]

come back with a runtime of 12h+

[ArduinoBen]

12 minutes ago, themctipers said:

come back with a runtime of 12h+

Yes.  CPUs don't just have to "sprint", we all game for long sessions every so often, and hardly ever turn our PCs off.

[Guest]

Benchmarks aren't all. We all sometimes get overobsessed with them, when in fact the performance gains aren't even necessary. (On a side note, my x5650 runs at max 3.6ghz without messing with voltage). 

[TheRealOranges]

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3693576

 

just for the sake of it

[Votivee]

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3693598

 

1 hour ago, Rallenhayestime said:

Can anybody benchmark their CPUs on userbenchmark and beat my CPU?

Yep

[Jumper118]

1 hour ago, Rallenhayestime said:

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3693240
Can anybody benchmark their CPUs on userbenchmark and beat my CPU?

can be any CPU, not just x58

 

4.8ghz on 45nm

1 hour ago, ArduinoBen said:

Yes.  CPUs don't just have to "sprint", we all game for long sessions every so often, and hardly ever turn our PCs off.

No. I don't game and my 2nd highest hours on steam is firestrike so........ 

[asand1]

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3694168 Not as high as yours, but here yah go. Nice mobo BTW.

[done12many2]

5 hours ago, Rallenhayestime said:

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3693240
Can anybody benchmark their CPUs on userbenchmark and beat my CPU?

can be any CPU, not just x58

 

 

I beat you by just a little.     Newer architecture, but 2 less cores and 4 less threads.  UFO status across the board.  

 

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3694616

 

 

 

 

Versus

 

 

 

[NuclearKing]

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3590927

 

I beat you all except the insane 5.3 GHz score! I know the overall score is heavily skewed towards single and quad-core, but regardless, my i5 takes second place!

[NuclearKing]

1 hour ago, done12many2 said:

 

 

I beat you by just a little.     Newer architecture, but 2 less cores and 4 less threads.  UFO status across the board.  

 

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3694616

 

 

 

 

Versus

 

 

 

How did you trick UserBench into using SLI? There is no other way that GPU score is possible.

[done12many2]

2 minutes ago, NuclearKing said:

How did you trick UserBench into using SLI? There is no other way that GPU score is possible.

 

It wasn't using SLI.  

 

4 minutes ago, NuclearKing said:

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3590927

 

I beat you all except the insane 5.3 GHz score! I know the overall score is heavily skewed towards single and quad-core, but regardless, my i5 takes second place!

 

In all fairness, I was actually running at 5.4 for that one.  

[NuclearKing]

Just now, done12many2 said:

 

It wasn't using SLI.  

Then how?! Its 60% better than the average 1080 Ti. To my knowledge, they dont OC like that, and the core clock isnt exceptional, at 1999 MHz

[done12many2]

Just now, NuclearKing said:

Then how?! Its 60% better than the average 1080 Ti. To my knowledge, they dont OC like that, and the core clock isnt exceptional, at 1999 MHz

 

You got me bud.  I don't use the Userbench benchmark often.  Seems like garbage to me.  

 

I'll try to replicate it for you. 

[done12many2]

1 hour ago, NuclearKing said:

Then how?! Its 60% better than the average 1080 Ti. To my knowledge, they dont OC like that, and the core clock isnt exceptional, at 1999 MHz

 

Turns out you were right man.  I captured it this time and both GPUs are running at certain points in the benchmark.  It might be that I forced SLI in NVInspector for previous benchmarks with Unigene Superpostion, but either way it's great as SLI has never run on UserBenchmark before.  

 

I dropped clocks on CPU from 5.425 GHz on last run to 5.4 GHz on this run and GPUs from 2138 MHz to 2126 MHz so that combined with the fact that this was captured using Shadowplay on the same rig running the benchmark should explain the slight drop in scores. 

 

It might be a while before YouTube finishes processing the video before you can see it clear enough.

 

 

[NuclearKing]

4 hours ago, done12many2 said:

 

Turns out you were right man.  I captured it this time and both GPUs are running at certain points in the benchmark.  It might be that I forced SLI in NVInspector for previous benchmarks with Unigene Superpostion, but either way it's great as SLI has never run on UserBenchmark before.  

 

I dropped clocks on CPU from 5.425 GHz on last run to 5.4 GHz on this run and GPUs from 2138 MHz to 2126 MHz so that combined with the fact that this was captured using Shadowplay on the same rig running the benchmark should explain the slight drop in scores. 

 

It might be a while before YouTube finishes processing the video before you can see it clear enough.

 

 

That is quite fascinating. Therefore it is probably the highest GPU score ever recorded on Userbenchmark, although unfortunately that doesn't mean much.  Userbench is still just Userbench, take results with a grain of salt.