Jump to content

low fps on bf1 with gtx 1080

MrJarhead
By MrJarhead
in Graphics Cards
 Share
Posted
1 hour ago, App4that said:

Been a loooong time since I saw somethin this stupid on LTT. I'll take two of what ever you're smokin. 

Tell that to the guy that posted immediately after you. He seems to agree that a 980 can, in fact get 130 FPS if you tweak it properly. Fuck off.

S.K.Y.N.E.T. v4.3

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 64GB DDR4 3200 | 12GB RX 6700XT |   Twin 24" Pixio PX248 Prime 1080p 144Hz Displays | 256GB Sabrent NVMe (OS) | 500GB Samsung 840 Pro #1 | 500GB Samsung 840 Pro #2 | 2TB Samsung 860 Evo | 1TB Western Digital NVMe | 2TB Sabrent NVMe | Intel Wireless-AC 9260

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
10 minutes ago, Imglidinhere said:

Tell that to the guy that posted immediately after you. He seems to agree that a 980 can, in fact get 130 FPS if you tweak it properly. Fuck off.

ikr lol, a 980 get 130fps ultra on bf1, it cant even do it on bf4 lmao xD and bf4 is way easier to run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
1 hour ago, pyrojoe34 said:

It absolutely can. I have mine running 1080p ultra, 130% resolution and get 80fps. At 100% resolution, ultra settings I get 110-120fps. That's at factory OC too.

you cant even get 110-120fps on battlefield 4 ultra, so i doubt thats true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

check the resolution scaling in the beta there was a bug were 4k for example was actually running at 8k check in game would the games actually running at 

international racing driver

My Build

i5-7600k

hyper x fury 16gb (2133)mhz

asus strix 1070 

CM 212x

asus z270-p

corsair 550w psu

 

agon 1440p 144hz tn monitor

corsair strafe mx silent KB

corsair void rbg (wired)

razer mamba te with firefly mouse pat

ps4 controller using ds4 windows

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
Just now, CatXice said:

check the resolution scaling in the beta there was a bug were 4k for example was actually running at 8k check in game would the games actually running at 

its at 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, MrJarhead said:

its at 100%

ye its a bug that was in beta u might be getting it were 100% is running as 200% therefore 1920*1080p was running at basicly 4k go into a game open the console and check 

international racing driver

My Build

i5-7600k

hyper x fury 16gb (2133)mhz

asus strix 1070 

CM 212x

asus z270-p

corsair 550w psu

 

agon 1440p 144hz tn monitor

corsair strafe mx silent KB

corsair void rbg (wired)

razer mamba te with firefly mouse pat

ps4 controller using ds4 windows

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

that bug has been fixed a while ago,don't think that was even in the release version

i7 4790K | 4.5ghz @1.19v / 1080 ti strix oc  / Asus Z97 Pro Gamer  / 970 Evo 500GB | 850 Evo 500GB / Corsair 780t white|window  

                                                                                   PG279Q | VG248QE/ Corsair ax860i   /   Corsair H110i GTX   /  Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 2400mhz /

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
1 minute ago, McHox said:

that bug has been fixed a while ago,don't think that was even in the release version

i did a firestrike test and my results came back perfectly normal, it has to be the game, every other game i play, plays how it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
38 minutes ago, MrJarhead said:

you cant even get 110-120fps on battlefield 4 ultra, so i doubt thats true.

Doubt all you want... it's true. I play at 1080p Ultra (I just turn off motion blur and DOF but keep AA) with 130% scaling & factory OC and get 80fps. A properly OCed 980 at 100% scaling (especially if they turn off AA) will absolutely be able to do so.

 

I'm out of town so I can't record proof for you but it's definitely possible. A stock 980 without any OC during the beta (before driver and game optimizations) got 97fps avg at 1080p Ultra. A 10-20% fps improvement after OCing and driver/game optimizations is not that crazy. Not sure why you find this so unbelievable.

Primary PC-

CPU: Intel i7-6800k @ 4.2-4.4Ghz   CPU COOLER: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro 4   MOBO: MSI X99A SLI Plus   RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX quad-channel DDR4-2800  GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 SC2 iCX   PSU: Corsair RM1000i   CASE: Corsair 750D Obsidian   SSDs: 500GB Samsung 960 Evo + 256GB Samsung 850 Pro   HDDs: Toshiba 3TB + Seagate 1TB   Monitors: Acer Predator XB271HUC 27" 2560x1440 (165Hz G-Sync)  +  LG 29UM57 29" 2560x1080   OS: Windows 10 Pro

Album

Other Systems:

Spoiler

Home HTPC/NAS-

CPU: AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4Ghz  MOBO: Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3   RAM: 16GB dual-channel DDR3-1600  GPU: Gigabyte GTX 760 OC   PSU: Rosewill 750W   CASE: Antec Gaming One   SSD: 120GB PNY CS1311   HDDs: WD Red 3TB + WD 320GB   Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2693HM 26" 1920x1200 -or- Steam Link to Vizio M43C1 43" 4K TV  OS: Windows 10 Pro

 

Offsite NAS/VM Server-

CPU: 2x Xeon E5645 (12-core)  Model: Dell PowerEdge T610  RAM: 16GB DDR3-1333  PSUs: 2x 570W  SSDs: 8GB Kingston Boot FD + 32GB Sandisk Cache SSD   HDDs: WD Red 4TB + Seagate 2TB + Seagate 320GB   OS: FreeNAS 11+

 

Laptop-

CPU: Intel i7-3520M   Model: Dell Latitude E6530   RAM: 8GB dual-channel DDR3-1600  GPU: Nvidia NVS 5200M   SSD: 240GB TeamGroup L5   HDD: WD Black 320GB   Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2693HM 26" 1920x1200   OS: Windows 10 Pro

Having issues with a Corsair AIO? Possible fix here:

Spoiler

Are you getting weird fan behavior, speed fluctuations, and/or other issues with Link?

Are you running AIDA64, HWinfo, CAM, or HWmonitor? (ASUS suite & other monitoring software often have the same issue.)

Corsair Link has problems with some monitoring software so you may have to change some settings to get them to work smoothly.

-For AIDA64: First make sure you have the newest update installed, then, go to Preferences>Stability and make sure the "Corsair Link sensor support" box is checked and make sure the "Asetek LC sensor support" box is UNchecked.

-For HWinfo: manually disable all monitoring of the AIO sensors/components.

-For others: Disable any monitoring of Corsair AIO sensors.

That should fix the fan issue for some Corsair AIOs (H80i GT/v2, H110i GTX/H115i, H100i GTX and others made by Asetek). The problem is bad coding in Link that fights for AIO control with other programs. You can test if this worked by setting the fan speed in Link to 100%, if it doesn't fluctuate you are set and can change the curve to whatever. If that doesn't work or you're still having other issues then you probably still have a monitoring software interfering with the AIO/Link communications, find what it is and disable it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

With my 1080 on 1440 with ultra preset I would sit around 100-130 fps. After the past few patches it was around 90-110. 

 

On 1080p the CPU would be pegged at 100 so it ran like shit. It was the same on 1440 too but only one map was really bad. My Titan black would sit at 90 fps on 1080 ultra so I imagine a 980 should do a tad better. 

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 hour ago, Imglidinhere said:

Tell that to the guy that posted immediately after you. He seems to agree that a 980 can, in fact get 130 FPS if you tweak it properly. Fuck off.

Dat moment you find the graphics options menu, let me know. 

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
11 hours ago, Mick Naughty said:

With my 1080 on 1440 with ultra preset I would sit around 100-130 fps. After the past few patches it was around 90-110. 

 

On 1080p the CPU would be pegged at 100 so it ran like shit. It was the same on 1440 too but only one map was really bad. My Titan black would sit at 90 fps on 1080 ultra so I imagine a 980 should do a tad better. 

your 4790k at 100% usage? mine sits at around 75%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 hour ago, MrJarhead said:

your 4790k at 100% usage? mine sits at around 75%

Like I said, before the patches. 

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

1440, might have been on the medium or high preset. Don't remember as I had to switch depending on the map. Underclocking the Titan b quite a bit as it's on air. 

IMG_1400.JPG

IMG_1401.JPG

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

i have no doubt its the lousy game, it used to run so much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

so i did a reinstall of windows and also had some people on the battlelog telling me the same story. one of them with a 7700k and 1080 is having the same issue, said one night his fps was fine, went to bed, the next day crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 27.4.2017 at 6:47 PM, Dan Castellaneta said:

Check CPU usage. Battlefield 1 is really hard on CPU usage in general.

constantly on 100% usage with a i5 4690k 4,7ghz and aorus gtx 1080 ti. On some maps cant even hit 60fps with 1440p low. gpu average usage is like 40% and cpu always 100% and there arent even other demanding tasks in the background also task manager isnt showing anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, Tiwaz said:

constantly on 100% usage with a i5 4690k 4,7ghz and aorus gtx 1080 ti. On some maps cant even hit 60fps with 1440p low. gpu average usage is like 40% and cpu always 100% and there arent even other demanding tasks in the background also task manager isnt showing anything

did you just hijack a fuckin thread

Check out my guide on how to scan cover art here!

Local asshole and 6th generation console enthusiast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
22 minutes ago, Tiwaz said:

constantly on 100% usage with a i5 4690k 4,7ghz and aorus gtx 1080 ti. On some maps cant even hit 60fps with 1440p low. gpu average usage is like 40% and cpu always 100% and there arent even other demanding tasks in the background also task manager isnt showing anything

thats because you have an i5, bf1 will give you 100% usage on all i5s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
12 hours ago, MrJarhead said:

thats because you have an i5, bf1 will give you 100% usage on all i5s.

i know, but the fact that an i5 will bottleneck any middle to high end gpu in bf1 is pretty ridiculous, i mean 90% of people dont run a desktop i7 and Ryzen 5 even performs worse than a good i5

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Having same problem here with ryzen 5 1600x and evga gtx 1080 ftw2 at 1080p.

 

My unigine heaven scores ultra quality and extreme tesselation with 8x aa 2800, without aa it's 3600 points. 

 

And a lot stutter since I turned to dx12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

This really just sounds like the BF1 port to PC being garbage.

 

I would focus more on complaining on their forums so you guys can get them to patch it.

Desktop:

AMD Ryzen 7 @ 3.9ghz 1.35v w/ Noctua NH-D15 SE AM4 Edition

ASUS STRIX X370-F GAMING Motherboard

ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5700XT

Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x 8GB) DDR4 3200

Samsung 960 EVO 500GB NVME

2x4TB Seagate Barracuda HDDs

Corsair RM850X

Be Quiet Silent Base 800

Elgato HD60 Pro

Sceptre C305B-200UN Ultra Wide 2560x1080 200hz Monitor

Logitech G910 Orion Spectrum Keyboard

Logitech G903 Mouse

Oculus Rift CV1 w/ 3 Sensors + Earphones

 

Laptop:

Acer Nitro 5:

Intel Core I5-8300H

Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x 8GB) DDR4 2666

Geforce GTX 1050ti 4GB

Intel 600p 256GB NVME

Seagate Firecuda 2TB SSHD

Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

My old ass Titan will give my i7 100% use on bf1. Almost as much as my 1080 does. Bf1 has gotten a lot better through. 

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Graphics Cards

×