Jump to content

Router vs AP

Go to solution Solved by Donut417,
5 hours ago, Akadis said:

you can have a router setup to connect to the wifi and give out another one with dd-wrt for example. no need for cables

Thats if you use it as a repeater. Repeaters suck hairy balls. It will cause the OP to performance issues on their network. Using as an AP requires you to connect a cable. 

 

1 hour ago, The Benjamins said:

what is called a mesh network, that is how googles new router works.

The difference is, The mesh networks like Googles have a dedicated 5Ghz radio that communicates between repeater and router and the other radios communicate with the devices connected to it. A standard repeater has one radio that communicates between the router and all the devices. So the OP will loose network performance. I heard you can loose as much as 50% of your bandwidth using a repeater. 

I have two areas in my house where i don't have enough signal. I have covered one with an old router with dd-WRT which i use in repeater bridge mode and it works ok.

For the secound area i need to buy new hardware and i was wondering if i should get a cheap router and use it like the old one or buy a cheap AP?

Important: can't run a cable to the device.

 

Any suggestions?

 

Thanks

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/764026-router-vs-ap/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest getting a good main router (cause the ones your ISP supplies are normally shit, compared to after market shit), (unless the current one is amazing) and using that as your main router and moving the old main router to the dead spot. If your current routers good, then get a cheap one for there, or get an access point for there (what ever one you can get a better one of in your budget). Don't get the wall repeaters they are absolutely shit, and are not worth it

The owner of "too many" computers, called

The Lord of all Toasters (1920X 1080ti 32GB)

The Toasted Controller (i5 4670, R9 380, 24GB)

The Semi Portable Toastie machine (i7 3612QM (was an i3) intel HD 4000 16GB)'

Bread and Butter Pudding (i7 7700HQ, 1050ti, 16GB)

Pinoutbutter Sandwhich (raspberry pi 3 B)

The Portable Slice of Bread (N270, HAHAHA, 2GB)

Muffinator (C2D E6600, Geforce 8400, 6GB, 8X2TB HDD)

Toastbuster (WIP, should be cool)

loaf and let dough (A printer that doesn't print black ink)

The Cheese Toastie (C2D (of some sort), GTX 760, 3GB, win XP gaming machine)

The Toaster (C2D, intel HD, 4GB, 2X1TB NAS)

Matter of Loaf and death (some old shitty AMD laptop)

windybread (4X E5470, intel HD, 32GB ECC) (use coming soon, maybe)

And more, several more

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/764026-router-vs-ap/#findComment-9652238
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Akadis said:

I have two areas in my house where i don't have enough signal. I have covered one with an old router with dd-WRT which i use in repeater bridge mode and it works ok.

For the secound area i need to buy new hardware and i was wondering if i should get a cheap router and use it like the old one or buy a cheap AP?

Important: can't run a cable to the device.

 

Any suggestions?

 

Thanks

Well the issue is an AP or Router will need to be connected via a cable. SO your kinda fucked. So you need to think about buying Powerline adapters or Moca 2.0 adapters to connect to the AP or router. 

 

OR you can use a repeater. But they suck serious ass. 

I just want to sit back and watch the world burn. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/764026-router-vs-ap/#findComment-9655239
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/10/2017 at 3:51 AM, Donut417 said:

Well the issue is an AP or Router will need to be connected via a cable. SO your kinda fucked. So you need to think about buying Powerline adapters or Moca 2.0 adapters to connect to the AP or router. 

 

OR you can use a repeater. But they suck serious ass. 

you can have a router setup to connect to the wifi and give out another one with dd-wrt for example. no need for cables

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/764026-router-vs-ap/#findComment-9672799
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Akadis said:

you can have a router setup to connect to the wifi and give out another one with dd-wrt for example. no need for cables

what is called a mesh network, that is how googles new router works.

if you want to annoy me, then join my teamspeak server ts.benja.cc

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/764026-router-vs-ap/#findComment-9673343
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Akadis said:

you can have a router setup to connect to the wifi and give out another one with dd-wrt for example. no need for cables

Thats if you use it as a repeater. Repeaters suck hairy balls. It will cause the OP to performance issues on their network. Using as an AP requires you to connect a cable. 

 

1 hour ago, The Benjamins said:

what is called a mesh network, that is how googles new router works.

The difference is, The mesh networks like Googles have a dedicated 5Ghz radio that communicates between repeater and router and the other radios communicate with the devices connected to it. A standard repeater has one radio that communicates between the router and all the devices. So the OP will loose network performance. I heard you can loose as much as 50% of your bandwidth using a repeater. 

I just want to sit back and watch the world burn. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/764026-router-vs-ap/#findComment-9673584
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×