Jump to content

Anybody else wondering this?

A lot of people are super hyped at how far they will be able to OC the 1700x and 1800x and what not but am I the only one curious as to how the regular 1700 will stack up non OC to a skylake i5? Of course we'll have to wait until youtube explodes with videos on the 2nd lol but im hoping it will be equal or greater performance. For the work loads that I do my speed of my i5 seems to be fine but I need more cores, so if the 1700 can meet it then ill be good. My guess is since the base clock is lower but the turbo is a bit higher that it will be equal or slighty better. 

 

And before you answer " omgergd y don u jut w8 fer teh benchmerks u fag " I realize nobody knows shit yet, im theorizing, and nobody said I couldn't.

Please Quote me when replying.
CPU
 - Ryzen 7 5800X3D | RAM - 32GB DDR4 4000Mhz | MB - MSI B550 A-PRO | Boot - 2TB NVME 980 Evo Plus | GPU - EVGA FTW3 RTX 3090 24GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

since its 65w wont OC as well an i5 i would think, but should be pretty decent. 

Main PC |CPU - i7-6700k|GPU - R9 290x tri-x 4gb|RAM - 16gb ddr4|MOBO - MSI z170 - A PRO|HDD - WD 1TB/240gb Sandisk |PSU - 700w Raidmax

Laptop |CPU - i7 4720hq|GPU - 960m 2gb|Ram - 8gb 2x4|Model - y50-70 Touch|SSD - 240gb Patriot drive|Display - 1920x1080 IPS touch

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah in single thread it might be a little behind due to clock speeds, but in multi thread workloads it might be as much as 2x faster at stock due to double the cores and SMT. 

Make sure to quote me or tag me when responding to me, or I might not know you replied! Examples:

 

Do this:

Quote

And make sure you do it by hitting the quote button at the bottom left of my post, and not the one inside the editor!

Or this:

@DocSwag

 

Buy whatever product is best for you, not what product is "best" for the market.

 

Interested in computer architecture? Still in middle or high school? P.M. me!

 

I love computer hardware and feel free to ask me anything about that (or phones). I especially like SSDs. But please do not ask me anything about Networking, programming, command line stuff, or any relatively hard software stuff. I know next to nothing about that.

 

Compooters:

Spoiler

Desktop:

Spoiler

CPU: i7 6700k, CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 3, Motherboard: MSI Z170a KRAIT GAMING, RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws 4 Series 4x4gb DDR4-2666 MHz, Storage: SanDisk SSD Plus 240gb + OCZ Vertex 180 480 GB + Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB 7200 RPM, Video Card: EVGA GTX 970 SSC, Case: Fractal Design Define S, Power Supply: Seasonic Focus+ Gold 650w Yay, Keyboard: Logitech G710+, Mouse: Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum, Headphones: B&O H9i, Monitor: LG 29um67 (2560x1080 75hz freesync)

Home Server:

Spoiler

CPU: Pentium G4400, CPU Cooler: Stock, Motherboard: MSI h110l Pro Mini AC, RAM: Hyper X Fury DDR4 1x8gb 2133 MHz, Storage: PNY CS1311 120gb SSD + two Segate 4tb HDDs in RAID 1, Video Card: Does Intel Integrated Graphics count?, Case: Fractal Design Node 304, Power Supply: Seasonic 360w 80+ Gold, Keyboard+Mouse+Monitor: Does it matter?

Laptop (I use it for school):

Spoiler

Surface book 2 13" with an i7 8650u, 8gb RAM, 256 GB storage, and a GTX 1050

And if you're curious (or a stalker) I have a Just Black Pixel 2 XL 64gb

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OnionRings said:

A lot of people are super hyped at how far they will be able to OC the 1700x and 1800x and what not but am I the only one curious as to how the regular 1700 will stack up non OC to a skylake i5? Of course we'll have to wait until youtube explodes with videos on the 2nd lol but im hoping it will be equal or greater performance. For the work loads that I do my speed of my i5 seems to be fine but I need more cores, so if the 1700 can meet it then ill be good. My guess is since the base clock is lower but the turbo is a bit higher that it will be equal or slighty better. 

 

And before you answer " omgergd y don u jut w8 fer teh benchmerks u fag " I realize nobody knows shit yet, im theorizing, and nobody said I couldn't.

omgergd y don u jut w8 fer teh benchmerks u bundle of sticks....

 

 

But seriously, I agree with @Mohenjo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a good chance it'll be almost on par in terms of single threaded performance and leagues better in multi-threaded.  I'm expecting more conservative overclock on the 1700, maybe enough to match or beat a 6500's single threaded (hopefully).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping as well, all I need is more cores for my streaming. OBS takes like 30% of my 6500 and that leaves only like 60% (cus 10%ish for browser, google is a hog) for the game which can cause bad stutters, dropped frames, right now im rendering my streams with my GPU.

Please Quote me when replying.
CPU
 - Ryzen 7 5800X3D | RAM - 32GB DDR4 4000Mhz | MB - MSI B550 A-PRO | Boot - 2TB NVME 980 Evo Plus | GPU - EVGA FTW3 RTX 3090 24GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×