Jump to content
6 minutes ago, Bleedingyamato said:

snip

Yes it does just like on laptops:
 

Spoiler

T4DG4zT.png

One of the first things you will notice going to the High Performance from Balanced or Energy Economy is that the CPU will keep running on max core clock regardless the load instead of scaling as demand comes, though this consumes more power it doesn't stress the CPU.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

Yes it does just like on laptops:
 

  Reveal hidden contents

T4DG4zT.png

One of the first things you will notice going to the High Performance from Balanced or Energy Economy is that the CPU will keep running on max core clock regardless the load instead of scaling as demand comes, though this consumes more power it doesn't stress the CPU.

For what it's worth I've also not ever noticed a performance difference in day to day tasks allowing the CPU to scale up and down as needed. I used to for years lock all machines at 100% clock using the performance setting but recently i've switched back to allowing the adjustment and haven't noticed a performance hit. Personally I enjoy reducing my power bill as much as possible, that means it's that much sooner I can buy the next piece of hardware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Daniel644 said:

-snip-

I have not noticed meaningful changes either, but then again I do not mind the bill and it is not stopping me from buying hardware xD

 

You could say it gives somewhat placebo effect too haha

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Princess Cadence said:

Yes it does just like on laptops:
 

  Hide contents

T4DG4zT.png

One of the first things you will notice going to the High Performance from Balanced or Energy Economy is that the CPU will keep running on max core clock regardless the load instead of scaling as demand comes, though this consumes more power it doesn't stress the CPU.

Ah.  Thank you for showing me.  

 

I'll have to take a look on my computer later because I don't understand that language.  I assume that's either Portuguese (I had to look up Brazil's official language) or Spanish?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bleedingyamato said:

Ah.  Thank you for showing me.  

 

I'll have to take a look on my computer later because I don't understand that language.  I assume that's either Portuguese (I had to look up Brazil's official language) or Spanish?

Portuguese, I graduated in translations and interpretations and I do professional translation from english to portuguese and vice versa for a living. I have public faith to translate official documents and such for notary offices, registry offices, courts etc... Great job if you ask me I managed to get funds for my PC and get into a second college which I start monday; information systems I will finally become a programmer like I always wanted to [:

 

I did not think the language would be much of an issue hahaha here you go in english, my bad ^^

Spoiler

choose-power-plan-on-windows-8.1.png?22f

 

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bleedingyamato said:

Ah.  Thank you for showing me.  

 

I'll have to take a look on my computer later because I don't understand that language.  I assume that's either Portuguese (I had to look up Brazil's official language) or Spanish?

if you just search POWER OPTIONS in the start menu search box it will take you to the screen he has there, basically Balanced allows the processor to ramp up and down between 5% and 100% where Performance locks the core clock at 100%, (it also has other settings, but thats the big one), you can also set Performance then go into the advanced setting and change the "minimum processor state" if you wanted to allow it to ramp down, really the different presets are just profiles that auto switch kind of like switching between picture settings on a TV, all the settings can be set manually, switching between performance and balanced (or any other preset) just makes it quicker to change, personally I set it to performance then go advanced, set the "turn off hard drive" to NEVER and then change the minimum processor state to 5% (the lowest setting)

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

Portuguese, I graduated in translations and interpretations and I do professional translation from english to portuguese and vice versa for a living. I have public faith to translate official documents and such for notary offices, registry offices, courts etc... Great job if you ask me I managed to get funds for my PC and get into a second college which I start monday; information systems I will finally become a programmer like I always wanted to [:

 

I did not think the language would be much of an issue hahaha here you go in english, my bad ^^

  Reveal hidden contents

choose-power-plan-on-windows-8.1.png?22f

 

That's great you're furthering your education.  Good luck with your new degree.  ?

 

 

Sorry.  It wasn't that much of an issue.  I was able to recognize the screen as being similar to the power management but not read what the options said.  

 

 

21 minutes ago, Daniel644 said:

if you just search POWER OPTIONS in the start menu search box it will take you to the screen he has there, basically Balanced allows the processor to ramp up and down between 5% and 100% where Performance locks the core clock at 100%, (it also has other settings, but thats the big one), you can also set Performance then go into the advanced setting and change the "minimum processor state" if you wanted to allow it to ramp down, really the different presets are just profiles that auto switch kind of like switching between picture settings on a TV, all the settings can be set manually, switching between performance and balanced (or any other preset) just makes it quicker to change, personally I set it to performance then go advanced, set the "turn off hard drive" to NEVER and then change the minimum processor state to 5% (the lowest setting)

I'm on my iPad atm so I can take a look later. 

 

Does the performance setting do other things besides lock the processor to 100%?

 

I mean if you set it to performance and then allow the CPU to ramp down as low as 5% doesn't that negate the benefit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bleedingyamato said:

snip

Thank you ^^

About the energy setting, it is like we have been saying the changes are not going to be that much noticeable, if you have a high end processor you should not worry much but say you got an i3 setting to the balance mode might occasionally cause certain issue such as windows telling the processor that google chrome application of yours only needs 2ghz to run fine and then you open a ton of tabs and it doesn't adjust correctly to a higher like 2,6ghz speed and you get that annoying program not responding lag here and there.

 

I would just put high performance because to be honest I do not think the price differences down the line when the bill gets to your door are worth somehow limiting your PC from reaching its full capacity.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2017 at 9:34 AM, Unimportant said:

Higher power usage for a chip only allows for more performance because it allows higher clockspeeds . If a chip can't go beyond a certain frequency, give it more voltage (thus, more power) and it'll be able to run faster, as long as the heat is dissipated so the chip doesn't burn and die.

 

Intel's Netburst (Pentium 4) went with that idea, they designed the chip specifically to allow high operating frequencies and all it did was vividly demonstrate to the world the concept of diminishing returns. At a certain point, every tiny increase in operating frequency requires monstrous extra amounts of power that quickly turn ridiculous compared to the actual speed gained.

 

I think it is safe to assume chip makers have learned that lesson and are now smart enough to pick that point beyond which power use shoots up while speed returns dwindle and they apply this knowledge to their chips.

 

Efficiently using extra power for more performance would then be done by using multiple chips, each of which running at an efficient clock speed and indeed that's what is beeing done. You can run multiple GPU's in SLI and buy motherboards that allow you to fit multiple CPU's. That way you can still build a 1000+ watt beast that somewhat makes sense versus burning 1000 watts trying to run that single chip a few hundred Mhz faster.

meanwhile nvidia's 10xx series..

im stuck at 1.06v on my 1070, and its hitting 125% power limit, but hey its getting 2100mhz core

(let us do more power limit, 1.06v is fucking nothing)

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Princess Cadence said:

Thank you ^^

About the energy setting, it is like we have been saying the changes are not going to be that much noticeable, if you have a high end processor you should not worry much but say you got an i3 setting to the balance mode might occasionally cause certain issue such as windows telling the processor that google chrome application of yours only needs 2ghz to run fine and then you open a ton of tabs and it doesn't adjust correctly to a higher like 2,6ghz speed and you get that annoying program not responding lag here and there.

 

I would just put high performance because to be honest I do not think the price differences down the line when the bill gets to your door are worth somehow limiting your PC from reaching its full capacity.

You're welcome.  

 

I have a 6700K so I might not have to worry about that like someone with an i3 like your example but I'll keep it in mind.  ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bleedingyamato said:

That's great you're furthering your education.  Good luck with your new degree.  ?

 

 

Sorry.  It wasn't that much of an issue.  I was able to recognize the screen as being similar to the power management but not read what the options said.  

 

 

I'm on my iPad atm so I can take a look later. 

 

Does the performance setting do other things besides lock the processor to 100%?

 

I mean if you set it to performance and then allow the CPU to ramp down as low as 5% doesn't that negate the benefit?

there are other settings, like what happens when you close the lid (on a laptop, like it can automatically put the computer to sleep when you close the lid or shutdown or do nothing) and settings for WIFI power cut off and what happens when you press the power button or sleep buttons, just a bunch of things like that, but as long as you don't let the computer put the hard drive to sleep none of the other settings really effect the overall performance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Daniel644 said:

there are other settings, like what happens when you close the lid (on a laptop, like it can automatically put the computer to sleep when you close the lid or shutdown or do nothing) and settings for WIFI power cut off and what happens when you press the power button or sleep buttons, just a bunch of things like that, but as long as you don't let the computer put the hard drive to sleep none of the other settings really effect the overall performance.

Ah.  Ok.  Does it affect an HDD or SSD much if it never turns off while the computer is on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bleedingyamato said:

Ah.  Ok.  Does it affect an HDD or SSD much if it never turns off while the computer is on?

don't know if there would be any real difference with an SSD, allow a HDD to shutoff means having to wait for the drive to spin back up when you go to access data off it which would be a performance hit, I know the External HDD I have attached to my Router (for NAS functionality) goes to sleep and it's several seconds (like 5-10) for it to spool back up so I can access data on it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×