PhysX supported games for nVidia GPU's.

[Techno_Reverend]

Well if we look at the amount of PC games on PC.. which is a ridiculous amount, then GeForce GPU's have a upper hand with PhysX in around 0.01% of games?

[Unexas.]

Are you telling or asking something?

[Guest Kloaked]

I don't know what you're trying to say.

 

Just to add, though, more games use PhysX than you think. UE4 uses PhysX as its physics system, for example. It's not the pretty particles and such that you can toggle on or off.

[NumLock21]

List of physx supported games can be found on Nvidia's site.

[RadiatingLight]

10 minutes ago, Kloaked said:

I don't know what you're trying to say.

 

Just to add, though, more games use PhysX than you think. UE4 uses PhysX as its physics system, for example. It's not the pretty particles and such that you can toggle on or off.

So what does UE4 do on AMD cards?

[Guest]

9 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

List of physx supported games can be found on Nvidia's site.

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/technology/physx/games

[Techno_Reverend]

What i mean is, besides the practically non existent PhysX games, nVidia are only better because they are leading the performance front right now.

 

 

[Guest Kloaked]

7 minutes ago, RadiatingLight said:

So what does UE4 do on AMD cards?

That PhysX runs on the CPU and is just as resource heavy as other physics engines.

[Techno_Reverend]

1 minute ago, Kloaked said:

That PhysX runs on the CPU and is just as resource heavy as other physics engines.

Which makes your previous comment highly irrelevant since you don't need nVidia GPU for that, just a fast CPU.

[Guest Kloaked]

Just now, Techno_Reverend said:

Which makes your previous comment highly irrelevant

No, quite the contrary. You were asking about PhysX and I assume implying that the only reason people would buy Nvidia cards is based on PhysX, and that's not the only reason why.

7 minutes ago, Techno_Reverend said:

What i mean is, besides the practically non existent PhysX games, nVidia are only better because they are leading the performance front right now.

There's a handful of games that use Nvidia technology (the togglable effects) in comparison to other games, but there are some that tons of people play every single day: World of Warcraft, Warframe, The Witcher 3, Fallout 4 just to name some. The amount of games that use GameWorks effects, whether it's PhysX or something else, is irrelevant. People buy Nvidia cards and stick to them for various reasons. My personal one is that I will only buy EVGA video cards unless I can be convinced to switch - EVGA has treated me well as a customer so they bought me as a returning customer.

[Nena Trinity]

Nvidia have the lead because of the sheep mentality, AMD once had the lead but Nvidia managed to do marketing so well that people all went Nvidia and remained there... ((tough some swap along with new gamers moving to PC))

[A10-FTW]

can a 750 run physx ?

[xAcid9]

0.01% is enough to make people buy Nvidia GPU even though they only play 1 or 2 games that support Cuda base Physx.

[Drak3]

13 hours ago, Techno_Reverend said:

Which makes your previous comment highly irrelevant since you don't need nVidia GPU for that, just a fast CPU.

In CUDA accelerated PhysX, the only things that require an NVidia GPU are some graphic enhancements. Any PhysX game can just rely on the CPU to do the work, unless some developer went shitlording for NVidia and somehow locked it out.