Jump to content

I7 4720HQ Vs i7 6700Hq

Go to solution Solved by roylapoutre,
Just now, rattacko123 said:

The 6700hq is a better cpu, 14nm process node, and more efficient architecture. I would go for the 6700hq, because it most likely has a better battery life

I used the 4720hq daily under programming load and I can assure you it's not that different from the 6700hq in terms of performance and thermals ^^ The only thing better with the 6700hq is the consumption, it helps with battery life for sure

Hello Guys ^^ Umm may i ask what is the difference between those two ?? Iam still confuse what to chose 

A Laptop that has I7 -4720Hq

But has Gtx 970m 3gb ddr5 

And A Laptop that is i7-6700Hq

But has Gtx 960m 4gb ddr5 

What is the gap or difference between the cpu ? Thank again everyone ^^ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 970m is miles ahead of the 960m. The two i7 will perform roughly the same in gaming, and the 4gb on the 960m is ridiculous. 4gb on the 970m would be ideal but even with 3gb it's still worth it over the 960m.

CPU : i7 8700k @5GHz, GPU : ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX, RAM : 2x8Go 3000MHz Corsair Vengeance, MB : ASUS Prime Z370-A, PSU : CM V850, Case :  NZXT S340, CPU Cooler : NZXT Kraken x62, Monitor : Acer Predator XB271HU 27" 1440p 165Hz, OS : Windows 10 Home 64 bits  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nagisa Shiota said:

Hello Guys ^^ Umm may i ask what is the difference between those two ?? Iam still confuse what to chose 

A Laptop that has I7 -4720Hq

But has Gtx 970m 3gb ddr5 

And A Laptop that is i7-6700Hq

But has Gtx 960m 4gb ddr5 

What is the gap or difference between the cpu ? Thank again everyone ^^ 

The 6700hq is a better cpu, 14nm process node, and more efficient architecture. I would go for the 6700hq, because it most likely has a better battery life
EDIT: performance wise, the one with the 970m is the better choice, but it really depends what you are going to use the laptop for, and what resolution display you have. For example, my 650m on my laptop is enough to play most games at 1080p, but some games (such as battlefeild) can only run at 720p. I find that for work purposes, the GPU doesn't matter too much (just as long you have enough vram, 2GB is probs enough).

hello!

is it me you're looking for?

ᴾC SᴾeCS ᴰoWᴺ ᴮEᴸoW

Spoiler

Desktop: X99-PC

CPU: i7 5820k

Mobo: X99 Deluxe

Cooler: Dark Rock Pro 3

RAM: 32GB DDR4
GPU: GTX 1080

Storage: 1TB 850 Evo, 1TB HDD, bunch of external hard drives
PSU: EVGA G2 750w

Peripherals: Logitech G502, Ducky One 711

Audio: Xonar U7, O2 amplifier (RIP), HD6XX

Monitors: 4k 24" Dell monitor, 1080p 24" Asus monitor

 

Laptop:

-Overkill Dell XPS

Fully maxed out early 2017 Dell XPS 15, GTX 1050 4GB, 7700HQ, 1TB nvme SSD, 32GB RAM, 4k display. 97Whr battery :x 
Dell was having a $600 off sale for the fully specced out model, so I decided to get it :P

 

-Crapbook

Fully specced out early 2013 Macbook "pro" with gt 650m and constant 105c temperature on the CPU (GPU is 80-90C) when doing anything intensive...

A 2013 laptop with a regular sized battery still has better battery life than a 2017 laptop with a massive battery! I think this is a testament to apple's ability at making laptops, or maybe how little CPU technology has improved even 4+ years later (at least, until the recent introduction of 15W 4 core CPUs). Anyway, I'm never going to get a 35W CPU laptop again unless battery technology becomes ~5x better than as it is in 2018.

Apple knows how to make proper consumer-grade laptops (they don't know how to make pro laptops though). I guess this mostly software power efficiency related, but getting a mac makes perfect sense if you want a portable/powerful laptop that can do anything you want it to with great battery life.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, rattacko123 said:

The 6700hq is a better cpu, 14nm process node, and more efficient architecture. I would go for the 6700hq, because it most likely has a better battery life

I used the 4720hq daily under programming load and I can assure you it's not that different from the 6700hq in terms of performance and thermals ^^ The only thing better with the 6700hq is the consumption, it helps with battery life for sure

CPU : i7 8700k @5GHz, GPU : ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX, RAM : 2x8Go 3000MHz Corsair Vengeance, MB : ASUS Prime Z370-A, PSU : CM V850, Case :  NZXT S340, CPU Cooler : NZXT Kraken x62, Monitor : Acer Predator XB271HU 27" 1440p 165Hz, OS : Windows 10 Home 64 bits  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nagisa Shiota said:

Hello Guys ^^ Umm may i ask what is the difference between those two ?? Iam still confuse what to chose 

A Laptop that has I7 -4720Hq

But has Gtx 970m 3gb ddr5 

And A Laptop that is i7-6700Hq

But has Gtx 960m 4gb ddr5 

What is the gap or difference between the cpu ? Thank again everyone ^^ 

i'd go with the 6700hq, its newer. although they will perform the same in terms of cpu performance.

"Sulit" (adj.) something that is worth it

i7 8700K 4.8Ghz delidded / Corsair H100i V2 / Asus Strix Z370-F / G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB 3200 / EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3 / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q

Samsung 850 EVO 500GB & 250GB - Crucial MX300 M.2 525GB / Fractal Design Define S / Corsair K70 MX Reds / Logitech G502 / Beyerdynamic DT770 250Ohm

SMSL SD793II AMP/DAC - Schiit Magni 3 / PCPP

Old Rig

i5 2500k 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P | Zotac GTX 980 AMP! Extreme | Crucial Ballistix Tactical 16GB 1866MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×