PostGhost was shut down by Twitter

[FoxofGrey]

http://postghost.com/Home/Shutdown/

 

"We created the website postghost.com to provide the public with a more accurate history of public statements made by the most influential public figures on Twitter. We believe PostGhost provides a fairer and more transparent way of allowing individuals to hold public figures accountable than Politwoops, a website that Twitter has recently reauthorized to publish certain deleted tweets."

 

On July 6th, Post Ghost was shut down by Twitter because the website violated Twitter's API policies. In my personal opinion, this is another way Twitter is censoring the community by enforcing these crippling policies. Though I would like to hear your guys' side of the story on this. 

[SansVarnic]

Interesting but you may want need to tweak your post to meet the posting requirements.

Also it is a good idea to use a source outside the subject of discussion for credibility. Just sayin.

 

Additional sources;

https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/09/deleted-tweet-archive-postghost-shut-down-after-twitter-cease-and-desist/

http://fortune.com/2016/07/11/deleted-tweets/

http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/9/12135646/twitter-post-ghost-archive-tweets

[MrDynamicMan]

This is Bullshit. People should held accountable for what they said. 

[apm]

twitter is going down the SJW route anyway, like randomly removing ticks from controversial people, who didnt even say anything bad. (well you might get triggered tho)

 

edit:  for reference:http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/15/milo-twitter-sensitive-photo/

is that enough to give someone a warning or even "censor" them, while other outlets do the same thing without any consequence by twitter?

 

when twitter removed @nero's tick: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/01/09/twitter-declares-war-on-conservative-media-unverifies-breitbart-tech-editor/

 

isnt doesnt matter if you agree with him and breitbart or not.

Edited July 16, 2016 by apm
context