is it good

[user328453]

1 hour ago, Moonzy said:

it'll help if you're telling the truth, just saying

because people will recommend the best gear for your hardware, if you lie about it you're only going to hurt yourself

ok i may actually buy this one Acer CB240HYK 23.8" LED LCD Monitor - 16:9 - 6 ms

my next computer.txt

[FuriousGamer]

9 minutes ago, Jackster1249 said:

ok i may actually buy this one Acer CB240HYK 23.8" LED LCD Monitor - 16:9 - 6 ms

my next computer.txt

Dont buy 4k right now because if you do that your gonna be spending your whole budget and only playing at around 35-40fps on max settings. Go for a 1440p monitor. Make a decision, stop switching on me, 

[user328453]

1 hour ago, FuriousGamer said:

Dude honestly your pissing me off switching like that. Dont buy 4k right now because if you do that your gonna be spending your whole budget and only playing at around 35-40fps on max settings. Go for a 1440p monitor. Make a decision, stop switching on me, 

ok ill go for a 1440p monitor final

[FuriousGamer]

1 minute ago, Jackster1249 said:

ok ill go for a 1440p monitor final

Alright give me a few min. Oh btw are you going for 60hz?

[user328453]

1 hour ago, FuriousGamer said:

Alright give me a few min. Oh btw are you going for 60hz?

idk go for 100hz or 130hz

[FuriousGamer]

Just now, Jackster1249 said:

idk go for 100hz or 130hz

Just go for 60hz because if you go for 120hz or higher your gonna need to lower your grapics. 

[user328453]

1 hour ago, FuriousGamer said:

Just go for 60hz because if you go for 120hz or higher your gonna need to lower your grapics. 

ok but does it apply for all the graphics settings or will it only 60hz just for 1440p

[FuriousGamer]

Didnt understand what you meant but heres why you should go with 60hz.

 

If you bought a 390 you would get 40-50fps on max settings at 1440p so if you went with a 120hz monitor you might need to bring the graphics to low-med settings and you might get about 100fps. So the smarter choice is going with the 60hz so you can leave your grapics on max. 

[FuriousGamer]

Heres the build for you btw http://au.pcpartpicker.com/p/vZrW23

[user328453]

ok ill go with a 390 instead

[FuriousGamer]

8 minutes ago, Jackster1249 said:

ok ill go with a 390 instead

Edit: Just saw your other thread saying you were going with 390x

 

390 is better because its about $100 less then the 390x and the only difference is about 3-4fps so if $100 justifies 3-4 fps then go for 390x. 

[user328453]

4 hours ago, FuriousGamer said:

4 hours ago, Jackster1249 said:

ok ill go with a 390 instead

Edit: Just saw your other thread saying you were going with 390x

 

390 is better because its about $100 less then the 390x and the only difference is about 3-4fps so if $100 justifies 3-4 fps then go for 390x. 

no i'm serious now im going with the 390 coz you can get it way cheaper and because everyone says its the best on the radeon side

[FuriousGamer]

16 minutes ago, Jackster1249 said:

no i'm serious now im going with the 390 coz you can get it way cheaper and because everyone says its the best on the radeon side

Mhm true too

[BurblingBarbacoa]

5 hours ago, FuriousGamer said:

Nah they really are unreliable, alot of people have had drive failures and even me with this partcicular brand. 

Not on my side. I have used maybe 20 seagate barracuda drives and some has drives from seagate. They have all been fine. I personally like WD blacks and reds but senate drives are fine dude. 

[FuriousGamer]

4 minutes ago, BurblingBarbacoa said:

Not on my side. I have used maybe 20 seagate barracuda drives and some has drives from seagate. They have all been fine. I personally like WD blacks and reds but senate drives are fine dude. 

I guess you got lucky. 

[BurblingBarbacoa]

1 hour ago, FuriousGamer said:

I guess you got lucky. 

Uh no I don't think so. I'm not saying that they are THE BEST but they are not bad. It's one of those things like 'everything AMD is a toaster that will heat up your house and destroy your power bill'. 

 

Yes. WD is better. At least for mid to high end drives. Blues and barracudas are about the same in my books. However seagate is not bad. 

[FuriousGamer]

3 minutes ago, BurblingBarbacoa said:

Uh no I don't think so. I'm not saying that they are THE BEST but they are not bad. It's one of those things like 'everything AMD is a toaster that will heat up your house and destroy your power bill'. 

 

Yes. WD is better. At least for mid to high end drives. Blues and barracudas are about the same in my books. However seagate is not bad. 

Its been proven that they have the worst faulure rate. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2089464/three-year-27-000-drive-study-reveals-the-most-reliable-hard-drive-makers.html

[BurblingBarbacoa]

11 minutes ago, FuriousGamer said:

Its been proven that they have the worst faulure rate. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2089464/three-year-27-000-drive-study-reveals-the-most-reliable-hard-drive-makers.html

Ok. Well they have been fine in my experiance for storage, general use and server use. 

 

On another note; thank you. You have made my day. Usually people just say 'fuck you I'm right' but you sir sent me a link to back up your claim. The Internet needs more people like you. Thanks  

[verydogesuchwow]

Ok, you really need to tell the truth about what your needs are. I don't believe you do video editing or have a 4k monitor, as you have switched back and forth on both topics. If you really need help on a topic, tell us. Otherwise, don't tell us you need help with something you don't have.