Jump to content

Fury X or Titan X for video editing

YT2002
By YT2002
in Graphics Cards
 Share
Go to solution Solved by Gofspar,

If you're using Adobe products, they can take advantage of CUDA cores (but it's pretty limited)

Fury also has only 4GB of vRAM.

I'd go for the Titan.

CUDA cores is the same as Stream processors, it's the amount of cores it has. Also it's HBM so 4GB of HBM is like 6GB of GDDR5.

The Fury X is going to render faster in all situations. the 390X beats the Titan X in compute still im pretty sure.

 

Geforce cards are made for gaming not situations like rendering, also the Fury X is going to be quieter and not get as hot.

 

@YT2002 Fury X is going to be ALOT faster rending dude...

Posted

I am entering that competition to win a fury x or titan x but I want to know which is better for video editing. thanks

PC is Intel Core i5 6400, GIgabyte H170 Gaming 3, Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x4GB 2400Mhz ,Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB, WD Blue 1TB, NZXT S340, ASUS Geforce GTX 960. Fractal Design Tesla R2 650W. http://au.pcpartpicker.com/p/793XNG. Graphics card choices don't always have to be dictated on performance. If you want the game stream and power consumption of the GTX 970 get that. If you want raw performance of the R9 390 get that. In the end we are all gamers, so what if your buddy gets an extra 5 fps? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Fury X, for sure. So much more compute.

PEWDIEPIE DONT CROSS THAT BRIDGE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

The question is do you need compute and do you like keeping money?

And fury x...im not so sure about that. I mean look into other amd options

muh specs 

Gaming and HTPC (reparations)- ASUS 1080, MSI X99A SLI Plus, 5820k- 4.5GHz @ 1.25v, asetek based 360mm AIO, RM 1000x, 16GB memory, 750D with front USB 2.0 replaced with 3.0  ports, 2 250GB 850 EVOs in Raid 0 (why not, only has games on it), some hard drives

Screens- Acer preditor XB241H (1080p, 144Hz Gsync), LG 1080p ultrawide, (all mounted) directly wired to TV in other room

Stuff- k70 with reds, steel series rival, g13, full desk covering mouse mat

All parts black

Workstation(desk)- 3770k, 970 reference, 16GB of some crucial memory, a motherboard of some kind I don't remember, Micomsoft SC-512N1-L/DVI, CM Storm Trooper (It's got a handle, can you handle that?), 240mm Asetek based AIO, Crucial M550 256GB (upgrade soon), some hard drives, disc drives, and hot swap bays

Screens- 3  ASUS VN248H-P IPS 1080p screens mounted on a stand, some old tv on the wall above it. 

Stuff- Epicgear defiant (solderless swappable switches), g600, moutned mic and other stuff. 

Laptop docking area- 2 1440p korean monitors mounted, one AHVA matte, one samsung PLS gloss (very annoying, yes). Trashy Razer blackwidow chroma...I mean like the J key doesn't click anymore. I got a model M i use on it to, but its time for a new keyboard. Some edgy Utechsmart mouse similar to g600. Hooked to laptop dock for both of my dell precision laptops. (not only docking area)

Shelf- i7-2600 non-k (has vt-d), 380t, some ASUS sandy itx board, intel quad nic. Currently hosts shared files, setting up as pfsense box in VM. Also acts as spare gaming PC with a 580 or whatever someone brings. Hooked into laptop dock area via usb switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Fury X, for sure. So much more compute.

If you're using Adobe products, they can take advantage of CUDA cores (but it's pretty limited)

Fury also has only 4GB of vRAM.

I'd go for the Titan.

I produce music!


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

The question is do you need compute and do you like keeping money?

Im going to seel my old components to my dad or a friend or online.

PC is Intel Core i5 6400, GIgabyte H170 Gaming 3, Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x4GB 2400Mhz ,Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB, WD Blue 1TB, NZXT S340, ASUS Geforce GTX 960. Fractal Design Tesla R2 650W. http://au.pcpartpicker.com/p/793XNG. Graphics card choices don't always have to be dictated on performance. If you want the game stream and power consumption of the GTX 970 get that. If you want raw performance of the R9 390 get that. In the end we are all gamers, so what if your buddy gets an extra 5 fps? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

If you're using Adobe products, they can take advantage of CUDA cores (but it's pretty limited)

Fury also has only 4GB of vRAM.

I'd go for the Titan.

Im not using premier to edit but i will in the future. Will get titan x

PC is Intel Core i5 6400, GIgabyte H170 Gaming 3, Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x4GB 2400Mhz ,Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB, WD Blue 1TB, NZXT S340, ASUS Geforce GTX 960. Fractal Design Tesla R2 650W. http://au.pcpartpicker.com/p/793XNG. Graphics card choices don't always have to be dictated on performance. If you want the game stream and power consumption of the GTX 970 get that. If you want raw performance of the R9 390 get that. In the end we are all gamers, so what if your buddy gets an extra 5 fps? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

TitanX - gaming card, not for editing ! 

 If you need Cuda take low Quadro card 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Fury X, for sure. So much more compute.

*As long as AMD improves the drivers

"We also blind small animals with cosmetics.
We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals."

 

"Please don't mistake us for Equifax. Those fuckers are evil"

 

This PSA brought to you by Equifacks.
PMSL

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Solution

If you're using Adobe products, they can take advantage of CUDA cores (but it's pretty limited)

Fury also has only 4GB of vRAM.

I'd go for the Titan.

CUDA cores is the same as Stream processors, it's the amount of cores it has. Also it's HBM so 4GB of HBM is like 6GB of GDDR5.

The Fury X is going to render faster in all situations. the 390X beats the Titan X in compute still im pretty sure.

 

Geforce cards are made for gaming not situations like rendering, also the Fury X is going to be quieter and not get as hot.

 

@YT2002 Fury X is going to be ALOT faster rending dude...

PEWDIEPIE DONT CROSS THAT BRIDGE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I hope to win !!

MacBook Pro 13" Mid 2012 w/Core i5 3210M and glorious HD 4000 Graphics

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

TitanX - gaming card, not for editing ! 

 If you need Cuda take low Quadro card 

I think the performance gains the Titan is going to have over a low end Quadro is going to be worth it.

 

CUDA cores is the same as Stream processors, it's the amount of cores it has. Also it's HBM so 4GB of HBM is like 6GB of GDDR5.

The Fury X is going to render faster in all situations. the 390X beats the Titan X in compute still im pretty sure.

 

Geforce cards are made for gaming not situations like rendering, also the Fury X is going to be quieter and not get as hot.

 

@YT2002 Fury X is going to be ALOT faster rending dude...

http://blogs.adobe.com/kevinmonahan/2013/09/13/enabling-cuda-for-the-mercury-playback-engine-in-the-macbook-pro-retina/

Adobe products can take advantage of CUDA cores. I know they're the same thing virtually but it is true that Nvidia cards have better app support both in games and applications.

 

I'm not sure about the vRAM though and if HBM is going to make that much difference...

If it renders faster though....

I produce music!


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

That test is bullshit it is fabricated or something

MacBook Pro 13" Mid 2012 w/Core i5 3210M and glorious HD 4000 Graphics

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
worst video lel

muh specs 

Gaming and HTPC (reparations)- ASUS 1080, MSI X99A SLI Plus, 5820k- 4.5GHz @ 1.25v, asetek based 360mm AIO, RM 1000x, 16GB memory, 750D with front USB 2.0 replaced with 3.0  ports, 2 250GB 850 EVOs in Raid 0 (why not, only has games on it), some hard drives

Screens- Acer preditor XB241H (1080p, 144Hz Gsync), LG 1080p ultrawide, (all mounted) directly wired to TV in other room

Stuff- k70 with reds, steel series rival, g13, full desk covering mouse mat

All parts black

Workstation(desk)- 3770k, 970 reference, 16GB of some crucial memory, a motherboard of some kind I don't remember, Micomsoft SC-512N1-L/DVI, CM Storm Trooper (It's got a handle, can you handle that?), 240mm Asetek based AIO, Crucial M550 256GB (upgrade soon), some hard drives, disc drives, and hot swap bays

Screens- 3  ASUS VN248H-P IPS 1080p screens mounted on a stand, some old tv on the wall above it. 

Stuff- Epicgear defiant (solderless swappable switches), g600, moutned mic and other stuff. 

Laptop docking area- 2 1440p korean monitors mounted, one AHVA matte, one samsung PLS gloss (very annoying, yes). Trashy Razer blackwidow chroma...I mean like the J key doesn't click anymore. I got a model M i use on it to, but its time for a new keyboard. Some edgy Utechsmart mouse similar to g600. Hooked to laptop dock for both of my dell precision laptops. (not only docking area)

Shelf- i7-2600 non-k (has vt-d), 380t, some ASUS sandy itx board, intel quad nic. Currently hosts shared files, setting up as pfsense box in VM. Also acts as spare gaming PC with a 580 or whatever someone brings. Hooked into laptop dock area via usb switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Graphics Cards

×