FX9370 worth it?

[ViruZ_HUN]

Hello!

 

If i get an AMD CPU i dont gonna buy the old gen AMD CPU i mean FX8350.

 

I have seen the difference between FX9370 and FX9590. the only difference is the GHZ.

 

FX9370 base GHZ: 4.4 Ghz turbo 4.7 ghz.

 

FX9570  base GHZ: 5.7 ghz torbu 5 ghz.

 

the price differnce is really big:

 

fx9370: around 300 euro

 

fx9590: around 800 euro

 

the price difference is really big.

 

If the fx9590 costs 500 euro more only becuze of the GHZ then it more worth to buy fx9370 becuze i can OC it to 5 ghz.

 

so is it worth to buy fx9370.

 

i would like to see some benchmarks about it if u know some..

[ViruZ_HUN]

anyone gonna tell me something?

[M-ursu]

You can buy 8350 and OC it to 5Ghz, and you will get same performance.

[christoi]

Both the FX9370 and FX9590 are cherry-picked FX8350's. Overclocked, there's really not much difference between the three chips, unless you are planning on breaking records with LN2. Just stick with the FX8350, spend the extra money on a decent motherboard and cooler, it'll make a larger difference with overclocking.

 

As for benchmarks, see here:

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/62166-amd-fx-9590-review-piledriver-5ghz.html

[JoshM]

From what i have heard they are not worth it, they are just a cheery picked FX8350 (i made a post about these when they were first released), your better off getting a 4770k or 3930x. 

[ViruZ_HUN]

From what i have heard they are not worth it, they are just a cheery picked FX8350 (i made a post about these when they were first released), your better off getting a 4770k or 3930x. 

hmm i will still wait to see 4930k.

 

AMD FAILED their new CPUs, hope intel not does the same.

 

but i am only thinking about the 9370k becuze new cores fresh new cpu it most be something new in it?

[FloRolf]

what do you wanna do with it? If its just for gaming, why dont you go with the 4670k and maybe oc it to 4.5ghz or so?

[M-ursu]

Both the FX9370 and FX9590 are cherry-picked FX8350's. Overclocked, there's really not much difference between the three chips, unless you are planning on breaking records with LN2. Just stick with the FX8350, spend the extra money on a decent motherboard and cooler, it'll make a larger difference with overclocking.

 

As for benchmarks, see here:

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/62166-amd-fx-9590-review-piledriver-5ghz.html

I bought cherry 8350 and OC:d it to 5.4Ghz, so he can just buy cherry 8350.

(I only paid 250€ for it)

[ViruZ_HUN]

what do you wanna do with it? If its just for gaming, why dont you go with the 4670k and maybe oc it to 4.5ghz or so?

 

well i use to edit and render videos with abour 200 gb video i am recording with fraps..

 

i cant render and edit with my curentlly computer becuz eit sucks..

[JoshM]

I bought cherry 8350 and OC:d it to 5.4Ghz, so he can just buy cherry 8350.

(I only paid 250€ for it)

How did you go about getting a cherry picked cpu?

[EChondo]

Just get a couple 8350's, a GOOD motherboard, and overclock each 8350 until you get to 5GHz, once you get to 5GHz, you just obtained a 9590.

 

If you're editing, get a 8350.

[ViruZ_HUN]

I bought cherry 8350 and OC:d it to 5.4Ghz, so he can just buy cherry 8350.

(I only paid 250€ for it)

 

i would like to see some benchmarks about 9370 before i say no to it?.

 

BTW is it a gaming and editing,rendering CPU?

[ViruZ_HUN]

Just get a couple 8350's, a GOOD motherboard, and overclock each 8350 until you get to 5GHz, once you get to 5GHz, you just obtained a 9590.

what about getting 3 of them oc all to 5 ghx and have all 15 ghz?LoL

[ViruZ_HUN]

so can i see some benchmarks about 9370?

[SteepGnomeKing]

To someone wanting to buy a 9370 all I have to ask is why would you buy a $1000 8350? That's all it is.

If you want a $1000 processor go for an extreme edition 6 core intel cpu.

If you want something cheaper get an 8350 and overclock it with water cooling as far as it will go.

[WoodenMarker]

i would like to see some benchmarks about 9370 before i say no to it?.

 

BTW is it a gaming and editing,rendering CPU?

There's no such thing as a gaming, editing, or rendering cpu. Some cpus just tend to be better at it than others.

The 9370 will perform just the same as a 8350 clocked to the same speed.

 

well i use to edit and render videos with abour 200 gb video i am recording with fraps..

 

i cant render and edit with my curentlly computer becuz eit sucks..

Just get a 8350, overclock it, and get an ssd or hdds in raid 0 to edit off of. 

[ViruZ_HUN]

To someone wanting to buy a 9370 all I have to ask is why would you buy a $1000 8350? That's all it is.

If you want a $1000 processor go for an extreme edition 6 core intel cpu.

If you want something cheaper get an 8350 and overclock it with water cooling as far as it will go.

 

 

well i wont buy something now i am waiting for 4930k if it can beat amd new ones..

[mymouthandi]

The 3930K well and truly beats any and all AMD CPU's quite significantly. The 4930K will be 5-10% faster on top of that. 

The FX9370 and FX9590 are just overclocked 8350's, that is all and although they are pretty fast, they still don't compare to the top end Intel CPU's. 

[ViruZ_HUN]

The 3930K well and truly beats any and all AMD CPU's quite significantly. The 4930K will be 5-10% faster on top of that. 

The FX9370 and FX9590 are just overclocked 8350's, that is all and although they are pretty fast, they still don't compare to the top end Intel CPU's. 

 

so what is AMD better in then intel?

 

well they have proved that they gonna beat intels high prices with higher prices:)

[sonarctica]

so what is AMD better in then intel?

 

well they have proved that they gonna beat intels high prices with higher prices:)

You don't have to spend $1000 for a good CPU seriously. If you do rendering and video editing as well as gaming, you will do just fine with 8350. If you really want Intel, get 3770k. If you have $650 to waste, buy the 3930k.

[Hazy125]

People keep saying buy an 8350 and overclock it. The problem with that is not all 8350's can even reach 5Ghz. The 9370 will get up to 5.

[mvitkun]

hmm i will still wait to see 4930k.

 

AMD FAILED their new CPUs, hope intel not does the same.

 

but i am only thinking about the 9370k becuze new cores fresh new cpu it most be something new in it?

nope,100% identical.

 

the difference is that your paying for a guarantee that it'll hit those clock speeds,whereas the FX 8350 might not overclock at all,or it might overclock just as well.

 

if you're waiting for the i7 4930K,wait for it,if you want a cpu now go for the 3930K.

it WILL beat the FX 9590 (the $800-$1000 cpu that turbos to 5ghz) and the FX 9370 (the $300-$500 cpu that turbos to 4.7ghz).

 

because while the FX 9590 has module based cores,where you have 2 cores per module but they share most of the resources,the i7 3930K has 6 actual cores and then it has 6 more hyperthreaded cores/threads.

[Exotath]

Don't expect leaps and bounds in terms of performance improvements when it comes to the 4930k vs the 3930k.

 

Sample of Ive-E chip performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4960x-ivy-bridge-e-benchmark,3557.html

 

 

Right now the smartest upgrades (imo) are 4670k/4770k or FX8350.

[mvitkun]

Don't expect leaps and bounds in terms of performance improvements when it comes to the 4930k vs the 3930k.

 

Sample of Ive-E chip performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4960x-ivy-bridge-e-benchmark,3557.html

 

 

Right now the smartest upgrades (imo) are 4670k/4770k or FX8350.

or wait for the 8 core haswell-E chips and DDR4.

[Exotath]

Can always wait in the days of ever advancing technology.  :D

 

In that case you're waiting till Q4/14 or Q1/15 correct?