Jump to content

Intel Pentium Running games?

I was thinking of doing a small build for a friend on a budget who want to later upgrade but I was wondering if and Intel Pentium G3258 would be able to run games with a dedicated graphics card because I remember reading something about some games unable to run with lower cpu's

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/308928-intel-pentium-running-games/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certain game engines will utilize 3-4 CPU cores and perform far superior than a 2 core CPU. You will still see performance increase in multitasking if moving from 2 to 4 cores on the intel platform. If the intent is to upgrade in the future it might be a good idea.

The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certain game engines will utilize 3-4 CPU cores and perform far superior than a 2 core CPU. You will still see performance increase in multitasking if moving from 2 to 4 cores on the intel platform. If the intent is to upgrade in the future it might be a good idea.

yea, he's wanting to upgrade later on when he has more money for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would it be fine running something like Dying light or something like that?

 

Last time I checked Dying light is heavily unoptimized so it's harder to say. I don't know if that's the best game to do a comparison with.

The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea, he's wanting to upgrade later on when he has more money for it

 

I started with a pentium g(something) and got an i5 quad core. It's a decent plan if you can deal with some AAA games not running full strength until you have the money. Although it might also be good to wait for the money to buy a quad core in the first place.

The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

great for most games; can be sure that it won't bottleneck in some AAA games tho

Want a good game to play?  Check out Shadowrun: http://store.steampowered.com/app/300550/ (runs on literally any hardware)

 

another 12 core / 24 thread senpai...     (/. _ .)/     \(. _ .\)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last time I checked Dying light is heavily unoptimized so it's harder to say. I don't know if that's the best game to do a comparison with.

They did patch the performance a couple times. Totalbiscuit said that in his "wtf is" . I'd get this and a really cheap mobo like a h81 (which can still oc ) and then upgrade to something like a skylake i5 or even broadwell if he has the money by then

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would it be fine running something like Dying light or something like that?

dying light runs like a bag of spanners on anything! one minute I'll be getting 120fps the next 5! it's horendous at times! and core 1 of my cpu is always maxed out while the others hover at like 70%

Gaming PC: • AMD Ryzen 7 3900x • 16gb Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200mhz • Founders Edition 2080ti • 2x Crucial 1tb nvme ssd • NZXT H1• Logitech G915TKL • Logitech G Pro • Asus ROG XG32VQ • SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless

Laptop: MacBook Pro M1 512gb

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking of doing a small build for a friend on a budget who want to later upgrade but I was wondering if and Intel Pentium G3258 would be able to run games with a dedicated graphics card because I remember reading something about some games unable to run with lower cpu's

Thanks in advance

pentium<i3 pentium is for laptops

isnt i3 for budget builds?

gaming pcs dont usually cost only 400€

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Sample Text ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering some games coming out won't even launch on a dual core I'd go for a quad core AMD chip like a 760k or something instead. Plus the multitasking performance will be better.

CPU: I7 3770k @4.8 ghz | GPU: GTX 1080 FE SLI | RAM: 16gb (2x8gb) gskill sniper 1866mhz | Mobo: Asus P8Z77-V LK | PSU: Rosewill Hive 1000W | Case: Corsair 750D | Cooler:Corsair H110| Boot: 2X Kingston v300 120GB RAID 0 | Storage: 1 WD 1tb green | 2 3TB seagate Barracuda|

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Itll bottleneck most AAA games, especialy badly optimised ones like Dying Light, Watch Dogs etc.

 

I have a G3258 (though thankfully replaced now with a quadcore) and I can confirm this. Tomb Raider, Skyrim, and Shadow of Mordor all ran really badly for me, though it was with a higher end GPU (GTX 970). Far Cry 4 would just hang in a black screen. The only relatively new AAA game that I played that didn't get bottlenecked is Bioshock Infinite, which kept my GPU usage in the mid to high 90% range almost all the time even with both cores pinned at 100%. Now obviously it's stupid to pair a 970 and a G3258 though (I was only doing it for a week while waiting to have money to get my Xeon to pair with it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×