8350 Vs. 3770k?

[Dragon2hand]

I'm thinking of getting an 8350 for graphic rendering and video editing  because Adobe AE uses a lot of cores, so my main point is which cpu is good for video rendering and gaming. Price to performance ratio.

 

Thanks in advance!!

[BlackOutCrisis]

Price to performance ratio the 8350 is better, raw performance the 3770k is better.

[Godlygamer23]

Also, do you care about power consumption? If so, 3770K consumes much less power.

[WoodenMarker]

The 3770k is plain better. As for price/performance, get a 8320. The 8350 is just a higher binned 8320 meaning it can hit higher overclocks more easily.

[EricX2]

+1 @Godlygamer23

 

The power of the 8350 is nearly double when at full load which would only be worth it if it was twice as fast, which it isn't. So you need to consider that. If you don't give a crap about how much power it uses, I'd go with the 8350... and I have a 3770k. Power usage is very important to me.

[Dragon2hand]

Thank you very much for your answers!!! I'm thinking of getting the 3770k but ill see if I can afford it :D.

[Woodypc]

+1 @Godlygamer23

 

The power of the 8350 is nearly double when at full load which would only be worth it if it was twice as fast, which it isn't. So you need to consider that. If you don't give a crap about how much power it uses, I'd go with the 8350... and I have a 3770k. Power usage is very important to me.

If you are so stingy that a few $ a year is the too much how could you afford a PC?

Edited: to delete swearing sorry.

[EricX2]

If you are so stingy that a few $ a year is the too much how the fuck could you afford a PC?

I thought Linus said the community wasn't like this? It isn't the $$$ it's the wasted electricity. Some people don't like wasting electricity.

 

I love the internet, where else can I get cursed at for having an opinion!

[airdeano]

i'm currently doing a productive study using vid edit/render, 3D CAD/CAM, modeling

and am having a hard time justifying the low-cost scenario to performance ratio to be

true. so far in video appz (adobe, sony, AVS, pinnacle) are falling short in productivity.

 

stock for stock, the FX8350 is not close to a 2700k, 3770k in studio tasking. single

tasks are ok, but when layered or multi-tasked the AMD is not playing well.

 

overclocked FX8350 @ 4.8, 2700k @ 4.6, 3770k 4.6, it should be scoring better times

and easier task functions and i'm not getting any of that. the 3770k is 6% better than

the 2700K and 18% better than FX8350. and rendering.. jeeze.. no contest. Intel.

 

figuring that RAW was grueling to CPU cores/modules, again the 3770k was upsetting

the FX8350 with faster renders, faster ray trace refresh and overall easier to work with.

 

if using less than 500Mb (uncomp) Ps files then usually less noticeable and less stutter.

loaded with plug-ins and 3rd party filters the FX8350 was stepping well with faster

launches, but was typically slower afterwards like the cache was bogged and too much

too fast..

 

and single threaded performance is pretty much the same except vid appz the gap got

narrower than 18% closer to 10%. but marked slowness overall with single thread

enabled.

 

airdeano

[BlackOutCrisis]

If you are so stingy that a few $ a year is the too much how the fuck could you afford a PC?

It isn't even about the money, some people like having a low power build just because that is their style, other people may not want a power hungry chip that is harder on the system (WAYYYYYY more wear on power phases than a 3770k). There is multiple reasons why people may not want a power hungry chip that don't include money.

[Godlygamer23]

If you are so stingy that a few $ a year is the too much how the fuck could you afford a PC?

Language.

[Woodypc]

Language.

Ohh, now I see why people were upset, sorry guys didn't mean to swear.

[Godlygamer23]

Ohh, now I see why people were upset, sorry guys didn't mean to swear.

It's fine.

[Woodypc]

It's fine.

I seriously din not realize it said that lol.