Error after overclocking
I tried to overclock and it seems to work fine on 4.5ghz on 1.200V but there is this other thing called "Ring". In a video on how to overclock this processor with the same motherboard I have. He said that the ring clockspeed should be a Ghz less than the cpu clock speed. If that is right how much Voltage should I give the ring? The max is at 1.200V and I think it wont work if I put my CPU clockspeed at 4.7Ghz and my ring clockspeed at 4.6Ghz to let the ring run at 1.200V.
Ring should not be 1Ghz lower than your core multiplier, that makes absolutely no sense unless you're running a x50 core multiplier, even then it makes very little sense how anyone could recommend that (maybe he said 100mhz?) either way, it isn't accurate. Generally people shoot for a 1:1 core:uncore, but having uncore ~2-400mHz below core is where people tend to end up north of a 4.5Ghz core clock. (MOBO settings would look like x45 core, x43 uncore -also called ring and cache). Roughly the same goes for core vs. uncore/ring/cache voltages, they will tend to hit a stable setting ~ -.05-.15v away from wherever core is. For instance, if you're stable at 1.25v at core, uncore/ring/cache will probably be stable at anywhere from 1.2v to 1.1v.
Here are the voltage specs I have used on the last 3 i5-4670/4690k's I've built:
VCore: 1.18-1.27v (all depends on luck of the draw and where clocks ended up)
VRing/Uncore/Cache (different MOBO's use different nomenclature-all are related to your North Bridge Cache voltage): 1.05-1.25 (all depends on luck of the draw and where clocks ended up)
VCCIN/Input: 1.67-1.75v
Voltage Offsets: + 0-.01v (leave offsets at 0v until you're at your clock limit, use them only to try a stable clock 100mHz higher than your highest stable)
Never set any voltage on Auto or any other setting other than manual for when you are benchmarking, Z87/97 boards do insane things with voltage on auto/adaptive using synthetic tests. Keep Vring/uncore voltage under 1.3v, Vcore under 1.35v, and VCCIN/input under 1.9v to be safe. If you're trying to hit 4.5Ghz and you're still getting blue screens around 1.25v @ core you will probably have to lower your uncore(cache) multiplier to ~x43. I've only been able to get 1:1 core:uncore on one chip @4.5. The others were stuck running 4.3/4.5 and 4.5/4.7. There is also the distinct possibility that your chip will simply not hit 4.5 at ANY voltage, it's all luck of the draw, although I would be more than willing to bet you're having issues with your RAM settings or the 1:1 ratio will just not be stable -it happens fairly often with these Haswell chips. If you're not already running your RAM in JDEC @ 1333 set it there until you find a rock solid OC, then you can try cranking the RAM up to whatever XMP settings it came with, although I would set the RAM voltage for rated even running at JDEC (usually 1.5 or 1.65v). In my experiences with overclocking Haswells Prime95 HATES RAM speeds higher than JDEC, I've only used Prime95 to bench it @ JDEC, then switched over to AIDA64 once I had my G Skill @ 2400 XMP's. Prime95 screen locked every time once the RAM had been increased. AIDA64'd for 14 hours on each machine for the final bench and they're all running with 0 issues.
Another thing to keep an eye on specifically with voltages is where you have LLC (Load-Line Calibration) set at. Most boards will have a 0-8 level setting, for OCing I wouldn't have it set at anything less than lvl 5, just make sure you enable LLC at a lower voltage setting and DO NOT try to crank it up to 11 (there is no 11, I just couldn't help myself) when you are already at your voltage limits, it will push it over.
Good luck

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now