which cpu is better

[Wiff]

.

[Shd0w2]

Obviously the 8350 >.>

[BonBon Scott]

What's the reason for comparing a desktop and mobile CPU?

[Archangel1994]

Are we talking pure performance or all around quality like temps and power consumption included?

 

Edit: If we talk all around performance the I7 is better with lower power consumption and heat output and better gaming performance since current games cannot utilise 8 cores

[JuztBe]

Why are you comparing mobile cpu vs dekstop?

[Levent]

intelmasterrace

[Wiff]

Why are you comparing mobile cpu vs dekstop?

 

 

Obviously the 8350 >.>

cuz a mate says that his fx is better

[Altecice]

8350 all day long

 

http://versus.com/en/intel-core-i7-4702mq-vs-amd-fx-8350-black-edition

[SeanBond]

Are we talking pure performance or all around quality like temps and power consumption included?

 

Edit: If we talk all around performance the I7 is better with lower power consumption and heat output and better gaming performance since current games cannot utilise 8 cores

Nope. That is a mobile i7. It's not going to be as powerful just on a core to core basis. Let alone having twice as many.

[Archangel1994]

Nope. That is a mobile i7. It's not going to be as powerful just on a core to core basis. Let alone having twice as many.

Do be aware I'm not comparing in a raw absolute manner. I'm taking the platform into consideration as well and relative so what it takes. Say the I7 consumes 50% less power and is 33% weaker in performance then clearly the I7 wins.

 

Edit: Then again this comparison makes no damn sense. You are comparing 2 CPU's with completely different surroundings, a completely different product for a completely different audience with a very much different manufacturing process.

[harrynowl]

At stock speeds on both the FX will be 10% faster on 8 threads, but at 4 threads it's a completely different story I imagine even with the clock speed difference.

 

Performance per watt also the 4702MQ is... lightyears ahead of vishera

[Archangel1994]

I vote for the third option: This poll is arbitrary, is irrelevant and is like saying an i7-4960x will beat a g3258.

[Wiff]

ok

[i_build_nanosuits]

it is in fact pretty close, the i7 has a little bit better single core performance but overall the FX seems to be a little better:

 

http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-4702MQ-vs-AMD-FX-8350

 

BUT, BTW...the i7-4702MQ is clocked at only 2.2GHZ...not 3.2...if the one you are talking of is indeed clocked at 3.2GHZ then it makes it much faster than the FX.

 

EDIT: I see it turbo at 3.2ghz on one core like all the others...it is what have been tested so the results i posted are the real deal, the FX is a better chip overall except in situations where only 1 or 2 cpu cores are being used.

[RyanShep97]

I've never really been an AMD guy but it wins in this battle

[i_build_nanosuits]

I've never really been an AMD guy but it wins in this battle

hehe yeah it wins it against a 2.2ghz laptop processor... but almost by margin of errors.

[RyanShep97]

hehe yeah it wins it against a 2.2ghz laptop processor... but almost by margin of errors.

 

Self explanitory really 

[foamygopher]

Remember the fx8350 might have 8 cores but they have to share resources due to the architecture. Full out the at 3.2 ghz the Intel would get better single core performance. As for heavy multithreaded applications the 8350 wins

[Wiff]

it is in fact pretty close, the i7 has a little bit better single core performance but overall the FX seems to be a little better:

 

http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-4702MQ-vs-AMD-FX-8350

 

BUT, BTW...the i7-4702MQ is clocked at only 2.2GHZ...not 3.2...if the one you are talking of is indeed clocked at 3.2GHZ then it makes it much faster than the FX.

 

EDIT: I see it turbo at 3.2ghz on one core like all the others...it is what have been tested so the results i posted are the real deal, the FX is a better chip overall except in situations where only 1 or 2 cpu cores are being used.

but if you change the power settings to max power it always runs at boost clock (3,2Ghz)

[harrynowl]

but if you change the power settings to max power it always runs at boost clock (3,2Ghz)

not on all cores it won't

[Wiff]

not on all cores it won't

false

[i_build_nanosuits]

false

only one core will hit the boost clock of 3.2ghz that's how they work.

[harrynowl]

false

Check turbo monitor. Unless you have force all cores active which is not present on any laptop I've seen (and I work in a repair store so I see lots of laptops) it will never reach the full turbo boost while executing instructions across all threads.

[Faa]

It does 6.0 in Cinebench 11.5: http://be.hardware.info/reviews/4758/10/msi-ge40-2oc-review-14-inch-gamingwonder-met-gtx-760m-prestaties-cinebench-115

A 3920xm thing does 7.2 has a base clock of 2.9 though.